Big Brother: Caught „Red Handed“?

Confession: I´m an – almost – addicted user of Twitter. Through a link in one Tweet almost a year ago I came across a website. Highly astonished I saw an advertisement of the US lottery for the Green Card: the whole North American continent in the US colors!

This understandably puzzled me, Plans already underway? Well, a joke, but showing US arrogance. Inspired by this I sent two tweets: “#Canada: Canadians, watch out! You´re obviously targeted for occupation: + link“ and „#Mexico: Mexicans watch out, you´re a planned victim of occupation: + link“. A Twitter follower favored the Tweet and about 15 minutes later I looked again at that website. To my overall astonishment the advertisement was GONE! You can imagine that I started thinking immediately. What is the only plausible conclusion? Well, Big Brother is watching me – or at least my Tweets!

Well, exactly about that incident and my conclusions I wrote an article on this blog: „Big Brother´s Fast Reaction“.

A couple of days I turned to that old article again – and was more puzzled again: the article still there, but the photo of my screen with the advertisement: gone! Only a white square to be seen:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/11/17/us-big-brother´s-fast-reaction/

I mailed to wordpress but didn´t get an answer. The only possible conclusion: there was a manipulation from an „interested side“. Disturbing! And Big Brother must have  willing helpers among software producers and providers!

How studid do they think we are?

It is astonishing to see that those chaps are taking us to be fools. Since a while I always get a message offering me „security“ by saving my datas externally:

And not enough with this, a web searcher always offers me „security“ by the option of automatically sending my internet addresses to Microsoft to have them „checked“ whether they´re „safe“!

BIG BROTHER – I´M NOT A FOOL!

Andreas Schlüter

Big Brother: was er alles kann – und natürlich macht!

Großmachtwahn

Vor etwas über einem Jahr stieß ich durch einen Link über Twitter (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter) auf eine Website, auf der sich neben dem Artikel, um den es im Link eigentlich ging, eine Anzeige für die Lotterie zur Erlangung einer „Green Card“ (die Erlaubnis, in den USA zu leben und zu arbeiten) befand. Zu meinem Befremden fanden sich in dieser Anzeige die Umrisse des Nordamerikanischen Kontinents, zur Gänze mit den US-Farben ausgefüllt!

Nun ist zwar im Verbalen diese Fehlleistung leider sehr weit verbreitet, meint man die USA, so spricht man leider oft von Amerika. Hier aber gewann die Grafik dann wirklich die Qualität einer Freudschen Fehlleistung, die Weltmacht-Arroganz der USA ausdrückend. Ich wurde von satirischem Verlangen erfasst und setzte dieses auf Twitter um, in dem ich je in einem „Tweet“ die Kanadier sowie die Mexikaner vor einer anstehenden US-Invasion warnte (mit dem Link auf die Seite). Als ich keine 15 Minuten später wieder auf die Website mit der Green-Card-Reklame zugriff – war diese Reklame verschwunden!

Für mich war dies nur dadurch erklärlich, dass der „große Bruder“ mich oder zumindest meine Botschaften auf Twitter sehr genau im Auge hat. Glücklicherweise hatte ich den Bildschirm fotografiert (wegen technischer Probleme nicht über den computereigenen „Screenshot“ sondern mit einer Kamera). Nun war ich allerdings „scharf gemacht“ und schrieb auf Englisch einen Artikel, „Big Brother´s Fast Reaction“ (des großen Bruders schnelle Reaktion). In diesem Artikel beschrieb ich den Vorgang und seine Deutung ausführlich. Vor ein paar Tagen griff ich dann auf meinen Artikel erneut zu und nun stockte mir der Atem: der Artikel war noch da, aber wo sich das Bild befunden hatte, klaffte einen weiße Lücke!

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/11/17/us-big-brother%c2%b4s-fast-reaction/

Eine Nachfrage bei WordPress wurde nicht beantwortet. Mir bleibt keine andere Deutung als die, dass hier von „interessierter Seite“ eine kleine Internet-Manipulation vorgenommen wurde! Dass dem Großen Bruder dabei Provider und Softwarehersteller willig zur Hand gehen, liegt eben auf dieser!

Lasst Euch nicht für dumm verkaufen!

Wie weit offenbar die „Zuarbeit“ von solcher Seite geht, dafür habe ich zwei handfeste Belege. Seit Neuestem werde ich auf meinem Computer immer wieder freundlich genötigt, von einer externen Backup-Möglichkeit für meine Festplatte Gebrauch zu machen. Die müssen mich für beschränkt halten!

Damit aber nicht genug! Des Weiteren wird vom Internet-Explorer ein „Angebot“ eingeblendet, das die „Möglichkeit“ eröffnet, bei einem Internetzugriff die Adresse automatisch an Microsoft zur „Überprüfung auf Sicherheit“ senden zu lassen, ist das nicht zum TOTLACHEN?!!!

Big Brother, für wie blöd hälst Du mich?! Übrigens als Internetsuchmaschine wenigstens zur (natürlich immer fragwürdigen) Sicherheit IXQUICK verwenden: https://ixquick.com/do/search?

Andreas Schlüter

Kennedys Ermordung: ein halbes Jahrhundert der Lügen!

Vor 50 Jahren glaubte ich noch daran, dass die USA das „Mutterland“ des Antifaschismus´ (http://tinyurl.com/bqqdwmv) seien, sowie daran, dass die USA dabei seien, den eigenen Rassismus und andere Übel zu überwinden. Dazu war ich fasziniert vom technischen Fortschritt dieses Landes. Es hätte nicht viel gefehlt und ich hätte Kennedys historischen Satz „ich bin ein Berliner“ mit dem eigenen Satz beantwortet: „ich bin ein Amerikaner!“. Wer allerdings meinen Blog kennt (http://tinyurl.com/cyk4mj8), weiß, dass sich dass schon seit langem gegeben hat. Damals, als Kennedy am 22. November 1963 ermordet wurde, war ich so wie viele – gerade jüngere – Menschen zutiefst schockiert, stellte aber mit 16 Jahren die „offiziellen“ Erklärungen der Mordtat nicht in Frage – wie ebenfalls viele Menschen. Schockiert bin ich immer noch, ohne jede Verklärung Kennedys.

Heute aber bin ich insbesondere davon schockiert, wie es sowohl in der US-Gesellschaft als auch in der unsrigen möglich ist, ein halbes Jahrhundert (auch gegen eine große Zahl von Menschen in beiden Gesellschaften) die Lüge vom Einzeltäter (oder auch einem von zwei Tätern) und die dreiste Leugnung der Beteiligung von politischen Kräften in den USA „offiziell“ aufrecht zu erhalten. Die Flut der Berichte im Fernsehen verstärken mit dem erbarmungslosen „Flachsinn“ diesen Schock noch einmal erheblich! Manch einer mag sich, wie unlängst ein Verwandter von mir, fragen, warum es mich überhaupt bewegt? Was macht das Thema für einen politisch interessierten Menschen so wichtig, die zu dem Ereignis weiter bestehenden Fragen zu durchdringen?

Das einzig verbliebene wahre Imperium

Nach dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs waren die USA das einzig verbliebene kapitalistische – selbst, wenn man die Sowjetunion als (nicht-kapitalistisches) Imperium bezeichnen würde – Imperium, ungeachtet der Tatsache, dass es andere entstehende Mächte gibt. Wenn die USA etwas anderes wären als was sie vorgeben zu sein, sondern eben keine wirkliche Demokratie, dann wäre das eine alarmierende Situation; und, man sollte sich wirklich sorgen, sie sind schon lange keine Demokratie mehr! Und die wirklichen Mächte im Staat sind nicht die bekannten Kräfte, die normalerweise schlichter Reichtum und Wissensvorsprung mit sich bringen, auch nicht schlichte und offene Gewalt, wie das üblicherweise in der Geschichte gewesen ist. Die Kräfte, die die Demokratie zersetzten und die Macht übernommen haben, sind schon von Kennedy und seinem Vorgänger Dwight D. Eisenhower beschrieben worden. Man höre (bzw. lese in den Untertiteln) ihre Worte:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt0w8Dyg8uE&feature=related

Blau wird zu Orange gemacht

50 Jahre ist der Mord an Kennedy jetzt her. Wieder und wieder wurden und werden wir mit den offiziellen Theorien zur Ermordung Kennedys zugeschüttet, dem einzelnen Schützen (man räumte später vielleicht einen zweiten ein), offiziell als Lee Harvey Oswald identifiziert, der angeblich vom Schulbuchlager aus von hinten auf Kennedy schoss und offensichtlich Kennedy von vorne traf!

Eindeutig zeigt der legendäre „Zapruder Film“, wie der von vorn kommende Schuss den Kopf des Präsidenten nach hinten wirft: Zapruder_Film_Original !

Und sogar viele Berichte, die die offizielle Theorie in Frage stellen, ignorieren die Lösung, von wo der Schuss wirklich kam und flüchten sich statt dessen zu obskuren dunklen Flecken auf Fotos vom Grashügel, zu dem sich sogar Menschen direkt nach den Schüssen flüchteten. Tatsächlich kam der Schuss von unten aus der Kanalisation, wie sehr überzeugend nachgewiesen wurde:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related

Wenn also offensichtliche Tatsachen verdreht werden und blau zu orange gemacht wird, zu welchem Zweck geschieht dies? Und warum werden Leute, die klare Erkenntnisse über den Schuss von vorn herausarbeiten, systematisch ignoriert? Gab oder gibt es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA, um die Wahrheit zu verschleiern, oder gab es auch eine Verschwörung innerhalb der USA, um den Präsidenten zu töten? Hätte es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA gegeben, um eine ausländische Verschwörung zu verschleiern, vielleicht, um zu verhindern, dass dieser Vorfall zu einem Krieg führen könnte, wären alle Gründe zur Aufrechterhaltung der Vertuschung längst hinfällig. Der einzige Grund der Aufrechterhaltung dieser Vertuschung kann nur darin bestehen, dass das Attentat ein „Inside Job“ war, also eine Verschwörung von Kräften innerhalb der USA. Die Kreise, die diese Verschwörung zu verantworten haben, müssen genau die Mächte sein, die sowohl Eisenhower als auch Kennedy so bildhaft beschrieben haben!

„Family of Secrets“

Und zu denen wurden auch bereist hervorragende Recherchen von Russ Baker angestellt (wie auf diesem Blog schon dargestellt: http://tinyurl.com/79brs86 & http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl). Verwickelt ist offensichtlich auch der Bush-Clan, speziell „Poppy“ Bush, George H. Bush, früherer CIA-Direktor und späterer Präsident (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/). Die Vielen verborgene Geschichte von Prescott Bushs Sohn, dem 41. Präsidenten der USA, zeigt allerdings, dass man ein drittes Element, das geheimdienstliche, hinzufügen muss. Dem anheimelnden Spitznamen „Poppy“ Bush, der etwas Väterliches insinuiert, widerspricht dessen frühe, immer gut kaschierte Verwicklung in eben jenen Bereich, den des Geheimdienstes. So gut war die Tarnung seiner Tätigkeit dort, dass es mediales Erstaunen gab, als Poppy CIA-Direktor wurde. Dabei war dieses „gut“ und schier unentwirrbar mit seinem Tun in der Ölindustrie und anderen wertvollen Rohstoffen verbunden. Immer wieder stößt Baker auf Hinweise zu Bushs Geheimdiensttätigkeit, die andere geflissentlich übersehen haben. War schon Prescott Bush tief in imperialistische Machenschaften in Mittelamerika und der Karibik verwickelt, so hat George H. Bush seine Aktivitäten auf das entsetzliche Marcos-Regime in den Philippinen und in besonderem Maße auf Saudi-Arabien, unter anderem den Bin Laden Clan, ausgedehnt. Seine Präsidentschaft (die 41.) wurde mit dem Erreichen des langfristigen Zieles der Mächtigen in den USA, den Ostblock „totzurüsten“, sozusagen „gekrönt“.

George H. Bush, „Poppy“

Wo war ich?

Poppy gehört angeblich „zu den wenigen Menschen, die nicht wissen, wo sie zur Zeit von Kennedys Ermordung waren“, so zumindest gibt er vor. Tatsächlich war er am Morgen des Mordtages wohl in Dallas. Ein Hin und Her des Weges erzwingt regelrecht den Verdacht der Verschleierung einer Verbindung zum Geschehen. Dabei gibt es diverse persönliche Verbindungen seitens George H. Bushs zu Menschen, die direkt mit dem Geschehen verknüpft sind, und im öffentlichen Bewusstsein nicht präsent, obwohl grundsätzlich bekannt sind. Die Rolle Lee Harvey Oswalds ist angesichts der vielen Details wesentlich als die einer Figur zu sehen, die offenbar sehr gezielt ins Geschehen dirigiert wurde, um ihn als Sündenbock, als den fanatischen und wirren Einzeltäter, präsentieren zu können um ihn alsbald wieder „aus dem Verkehr zu ziehen“. Dabei ist es fast egal, ob Oswald einer unter mehreren Tätern oder der „reine“ Sündenbock (the „Patsy“) ist, denn es wäre ein unglaublicher „Zufall“, dass mehrere Verbindungen über sehr wenige Stationen von Poppy zu Oswald führen. Der Mörder von Oswald, Jack Ruby, hatte wiederum Verbindung zu CIA-Kreisen, die in Mordpläne gegen Castro verwickelt waren.

Ein markanter „Schutzherr“ von Oswald

Ein alter Freund von Poppy war George de Mohrenschildt, russischer Emigrant und als schillernde Figur im Ölgeschäft und auch im Bereich der „Dienste“ unterwegs, gleichzeitig eine zentrale Figur in der russischen Emigrantenszene von Dallas, die weitgehend der äußersten Rechten zuneigte. Gerade den jungen Oswald, ehemaliges Mitglied des Marine-Corps, der angeblich aus Sympathie für den Kommunismus in die Sowjetunion emigrierte, dort heiratete und dann „enttäuscht“ mit seiner Frau in die USA zurückkehrte, weiter aber angeblich große Sympathie für Kuba und Castro hegte, nahm de Mohrenschildt zeitaufwendig und intensiv unter seine „liebevollen“ Fittiche. Auch Oswalds Anstellung bei der Firma, die Räume in dem legendären Schulbuchlager hatte, ging auf einen Kontakt de Mohrenschildts zurück, sowie eine ganze Reihe weiterer Verwicklungen in die Sache. In den Siebzigern, also lange nach dem Attentat, wurde der alternde Mann dann offenbar von großer Gesprächigkeit befallen. Nach einer merkwürdigen Odyssee und verschiedenen Kontakten sowie einem Aufenthalt in der Psychiatrie verübte er dann am Nachmittag des 28. Mai 1977 „Selbstmord“. Schon weniger als zwei Wochen vorher war de Mohrenschildts alter Mentor, Paul Raigorodsky, (beide sollten vom „House Select Commitee on Assassinations“ des Kongresses zum Kennedy Attentat befragt werden) tot. Merkwürdig, auch, wenn der Tod des gichtkranken Raigowsky ein „natürlicher“ gewesen sein soll. Zu den Informationen, die de Mohrenschildt kurz vor seinem Tode einem holländischen Journalisten anvertraute, gehörte auch, dass er Jack Ruby gekannt hätte.

George de Mohrenschildt

Ein weiterer Freund von Poppy

Ein weiterer Freund von Poppy, Jack Crichton, lokale Politgröße und Mitbesitzer des Schulbuchlagers, verbunden mit den Geheimdienstlern, die den Weg von Kennedys Konvoy festlegten, spielte auch nach dem Attentat eine wichtige Rolle bei der „Betreuung“ von Oswalds russischer Frau, um die ein enger „Gürtel“ gelegt wurde. Er organisierte auch die Dolmetscherin, die wesentlich an den belastenden Aussagen seiner Frau zu Oswald beteiligt war, was auch das Ziel hatte, Kuba in Verbindung mit dem Attentat zu bringen und leicht einen Raketenschlag auf den Inselstaat hätte auslösen können. Er war tatsächlich tief in geheimdienstliche Aktivitäten verwickelt und spielte in den Fünfzigern eine wichtige Rolle beim Aufbau der „Civil Defence Organization“, die Kalte-Kriegs-Hysterie schürte. Diese Organisation war auch an der Errichtung eines unterirdischen Kommando-Standes in Dallas beteiligt. Die erstaunlichen Verwicklungen aus dem „Dunstkreis“ von Poppy zum Attentatsgeschehen sind damit aber längst nicht erschöpft. Mit einem Wort, der „Zufälle“ sind im Zusammenhang mit der Ermordung Kennedys zu viele, um sie nicht als „Wunder“ zu klassifizieren, sollte er wirklich nichts mit Kennedys Tod zu tun haben.

Poppys Sohn, George W. Bush, fuhr mit Verschwörungen fort, manipulierend und lügend. Diese zwei Präsidentschaften waren die beiden Fälle, wo die „verborgenen Kräfte“ direkt „ihren Mann“ im Amt hatten, die Fälle, wo auch keine verborgenen Zügel nötig waren, an denen sie geführt wurden. Aber schließlich sahen zu viele Menschen allzu deutlich die Brutalität und imperiale Gier im Sohn, George W. Bush, personifiziert. Ein anderes Gesicht, eine andere Art von Persönlichkeit war als Repräsentanz des Imperiums und seiner Pseudodemokratie nötig.

Was also ist mit „Change“?

Seit der Ermordung Kennedys ist die wahre Macht in den USA für die offenkundig, die sehen wollen. Und seither wissen das die US Präsidenten auch. Die Tatsache, dass da verborgene Kräfte sind, die über das Schicksal des US-Präsidenten entscheiden alarmierte sogar „Tricky Dick“, Richard Nixon. Seine Forderungen, die geheimen Akten zu Kennedys Ermordung zur Einsicht zu erhalten, wurden schlicht ignoriert (siehe „Family of Secrets“, S. 244 ff). Spätestens nach der Amtseinführung werden sich US Präsidenten dieser bedrohlichen Tatsache bewusst. Aber insgesamt sind beide etablierten US Parteien tief in das Netz der Superreichen und ihres militärisch-industriell-geheimdienstlichen Komplexes verwoben. Obama mag wirklich einen Wandel im Sinn gehabt haben, während er dafür kämpfte, der „erste schwarze Präsident“ der USA zu werden. Aber sogar, als er noch eine klare Mehrheit hatte, versäumte er es, seine Versprechen umzusetzen. Es ist deutlich, dass ein wirklicher Wandel zum Besseren nur in einer breiten linken, also sozialen Bewegung, die sich zu kraftvollen politischen Partei entwickelt, liegen kann, so, wie es damals, leider vergeblich, Jesse Jackson (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson) mit seiner „Regenbogen-Koalition“ versuchte.

Präsident des Wandels?

Kein Wandel ohne umfangreichen Kampf – und die Souveränitätsfrage

Vor dem Hintergrund dieser Ausführungen ist klar, dass das ominöse Netzwerk hinter den Vorhängen nicht aufgeben wird, und schon die Behandlung der „Occupy“-Bewegung mit umfangreicher Polizei-Brutalität, die Manipulationen des Wahlrechts sowie die neuen Überwachungs- und Internierungsgesetze  zeigen die wütende Entschlossenheit dieser Kreise. Das bedeutet nicht, dass es dort nicht unterschiedliche Sichtweisen und Konzepte gäbe, es ist kein wirklich monolithischer Block, vieles deutet darauf hin, dass es ein hgeftiges Ringen zwischen zwei Fraktionen der US Machtelite gibt. Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen der „Softpower-Fraktion“ (ein „orwellscher“ Name, denn auch diese scheuen sich nicht, ganze Volkswirtschaften zu erdrosseln, „lassen aber lieber machen“) und den Neocons nehmen in den letzten Jahren wieder enorm zu. Es scheint aber gerade bei den Neocons rote Linien zu geben, für deren Überschreitung ein US Präsident einen hohen Preis zu zahlen hätte.

Eine weitere wichtige Frage

Eine weitere wichtige Frage tut sich auf: wenn es, wofür nun so viel spricht, ein „Inside Job“ eines Teiles der US-Machtelite war, und so wenig wie die Öffentlichkeit über die Hintergründe erfährt, was wäre, wenn eine andere Macht durch geheimdienstliche Mittel die detaillierten Umstände kennte? Wieviel würde so einer ausländischen Macht damit an Erpressungspotential zuwachsen? Mir fällt dazu ein, dass Kennedy ein erbitterter Gegener der atomaren Bewaffnung Israels war (http://tinyurl.com/phgb48j). Nach Kennedy waren die USA bereit, diese gefährliche Entwicklung zu akzeptieren und 1967 wurde die Bindung außerordentlich eng, trotz des gezielten israelischen Angriffs auf die USS Liberty. Da ist allerdings der Gedanke nicht fern, wie dramatisch die Lage erst wäre, wenn eine andere Macht Einblick in einen etwaigen „Inside Job“ im Zusammenhang mit „Nine Eleven“ (http://tinyurl.com/3gy8otq) hätte!

Andreas Schlüter

http://www.uni-protokolle.de/Lexikon/Lee_Harvey_Oswald.html

Assassination of JFK: Half a Century of Lies

On the 22^nd of November 1963 the US President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was shot and the US as well as many people all over the world were shocked, so was I.

Intrusion: I was 16 years old. At the beginning of that year we had moved from a northern suburb of Hamburg to Altona, a western part of Hamburg, near river Elbe. It was a time when I felt like answering JFK´s famous sentence „Ich bin ein Berliner“ with: „I´m an American!“. I was entrenched by the mainstream myths: the US are the motherland of Anti-Fascism and the US are doing away with Racism and are the „Land of the Free“. It fitted very well, I had fallen for the natural daughter of a Black WW II veteran living in a German family just round the corner. Unfortunately those days that was a very one sided affair (she loved me just like one would love a Mosqito), notwithstanding the fact that now since more than 16 years I´m harmoniously living together with exactly that Lady (but that is another – very private – story).

The hero of younger people in the West was murdered in face of many onlookers as well as soon after the release of the famous Zapruder film in face of millions. But also millions had seen the man presented as the assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, and the murder of him by Jack Ruby. Oswald was said to have shot Kennedy from a window of the  Texas School Book Depository . Those days TV and official presentations of the “facts” were not doubted by the broad public and neither by me. But time went by and many people learned a lot about the hidden side of the US, so did I.

In fact doubts came up, with some people early, but growing public doubts in the Warren Commission´s conclusion lead to another official inspection of the case, pushed also by the Church Committee. 1978 the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations didn´t rule out anymore that there was a conspiracy but insisted that all wounds on Kennedy and John Connally were done by Oswald. Admitting that there could have been a second gunman they strongly did rule out that the Soviet Union or Cuba might have been involved, but likewise ruled out that the organized crime as such would have been involved and strongly rejected any involvement of the Secret Service, the FBI and the CIA.

The famous „Zapruder Film“ gives a good view about where the deadly shot came from. This YouTube-Video is „no more available“: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0tZFkVhN00&list=PL30A9A32A38F3D52D

Here you can see the Zapruder_Film_Original with your own eyes!

A view on the Case from today: blue turned into orange, what for?

It appears unbelievable that Oswald as the deadly shooter is upheld till today! How could that guy have managed to apply from behind a shot that obviously hits the President from the front, that´s even more phantastic than the so called Single bullet theory.

So, if obvious facts are distorted and blue turned into orange, for what purpose? And why are people working out the evidence of the shot from the front being ignored? Was or is there only a conspiracy to cover up the truth inside the US (in order not to „make people feel insecure“) or was there a conspiracy to kill the president on the side of forces inside the US? If there was a conspiracy to cover the fact that a foreign conspiracy has led to the murder of the president, a conspiracy to prevent the incident to turn into a war, all reasons to keep it up are gone. The only reason to carry on with this masquerade can lie in the fact that the assassination was an “inside job”! The official distortion of facts is the result of a conspiracy in order to cover up a US based conspiracy against the president. The people conspiring must necessary be located in high ranking levels, exactly in that strata that was warned of by JFK as well as Eisenhower:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_II0H7X5O4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dctr_MoQ2cA&feature=related

Irrespective of the mystification of John F. Kennedy by a number of people it has to be said that  possibly he was the last US President who felt a certain obligation to world peace though not being a “saint” at all as to be seen on many occasions. He did not only take the civil rights question a little more serious than his predecessors, he stopped the sliding into atomic war danger, but he also stopped the “home terror plans” of his chiefs of staffs (http://tinyurl.com/32cp3), thus refusing to invade Cuba and thus setting borders to the “Military Industrial complex” of which his predecessor Eisenhower had already warned. There are many indications that that this complex reacted by putting that president “off”. The answer to the question whether they did so raises the question for the real power in the US and the question what is to be expected from it.

Frightening details in connection to this question and the connection of the Bush clan and the Kennedy murder were revealed in the book “Family of Secrets” (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/) by the investigative journalist Russ Baker (http://russbaker.com/) as been reported on this blog before (http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl, in German). Former director of the CIA and former US President George H. Bush (nick name “Poppy”) played a shocking role in this drama. Among his friends was George de Mohrenschild, Russian émigré, geologist in the oil field and CIA man.

George de Mohrenschildt

The deadly shot and the shooters

De Mohrenschild (http://tinyurl.com/yb82vwr), was a „fatherly friend” to Lee Harvey Oswald, “official” murderer of Kennedy. Which role Oswald ever may have played, whether introduced and integrated into the game by de Mohrenschild as a simple toy for confusion („I´m a patsy“) or as one of the shooters, he can´t have fired the deadly shot as a film documentation convincingly reveals: http://tinyurl.com/6sykmc7. There are also very strong indications for more shooters again: http://tinyurl.com/6w667sb. An eye witness to such additional shooters died under very dubious circumstances: http://tinyurl.com/7vuxwq2. After all it appears that the deadly shot came from the sewage System:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related

De Mohrenschild lateron became very talkative which may have lead to his strange “suicide” (http://tinyurl.com/d253daz) just before he was to be questioned again. By the way, Russ Baker was not the first to write about a connection of George H. Bush to the Kennedy assassination (http://tinyurl.com/3n9gcge).

Andreas Schlüter

More links to the topic:

„Deep State USA: Dulles, Dallas and Devilish Games“: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/deep-state-usa-dulles-dallas-and-devilish-games/

http://krvs.org/post/inconsistencies-haunt-official-record-kennedys-death

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-1.html

http://www.themorningsun.com/government-and-politics/20131119/government-releases-fully-digitized-version-of-jfk-assassination-report

http://jfkassassinationconspiracyupdate.blogspot.de/p/oswald-not-killer-of-jfk.html

http://grahamsdownunderthoughts.blogspot.de/2011/11/lost-tapes-made-after-jfks.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_rtbeMgOPQ

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/kennedy-and-%e2%80%9eno-change/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQrqoj5pgQ

http://www.darktube.org/watch/russ-baker-on-media-journalism-family-of-secrets

Arafat and Litvinenko: an Interesting Turn to a Mysterious Story!

A Case for Speculations

In November 2006 a former FSB asset and later MI6 agent (1), Alexander Litvinenko, was murdered by polonium-210 which left a broad trace from Hamburg to London. For Western media there could only be one person responsible for the death of the former Russian agent and harsh critic of Wladimir Putin: the Russian President himself!

I was puzzled. Though convinced that Putin is on one side surely the man who saved Russia from falling totally into the hands of the West I was likewise aware about the fact that he´s unscrupulous when it comes to strong opposition. But the story was too weird inasfar there was this idiotic trace of the substance through half of Europe. How could Russian agents be that careless while they have more „elegant“ means to „put someone off“? So I contemplated deeper about all aspects of the whole story. The conclusions I published in the district newsletter of the German Left (DIE LINKE) called „DIE LUPE“ in January 2007 (2). My conclusion was based on the old question „Cui Bono“, to whose advantage?

What if the story was a „setup“ by another side? True, most of world´s Polonium is produced in Russia but most of that is exported to the US (3). The US Power Elite is stricken by the fear for a closer get together of its technology competitor West Europe and the energy giant Russia. To spread fear for Russia is a strategic aim for them. If Russia appears spreading that dangerous substance through half of Europe it´s to the ends of the US. Moreover the coming in of radioactive substances makes it easier to spread fear for Iran in the absence of proven nuclear armament. So one can say that circles in the West highly profited from the story to the dissatvantage of Russia. And when the aspect of Iran comes in also the MOSSAD could have had an interest. I didn´t claim to have a proof but demanded if speculation starts one should look at the full scope!

Arafat´s Death Most Likely Caused by Polonium, the Clue to the Litvinenko Case?

Yasser Arafat died on the 11^th of November 2004 under mysterious circumstances in a Paris hospital. Speculations about the involvement of Israel´s government and secret sercices were widespread. Finally there was a close inspection of Arafats remains letting it now appear very probable that the Palestinian leader was murdered (4) as long before anounced by Ariel Sharon (5). The poison was obviously Polonium. Having been very much convinced from the onset that he was murdered by Israel´s „intelligence“ the Polonium case gave me now the clue to Litvinenko´s case. In the said article from 2007 I stated that the MOSSAD could also have been involved into the murder of Litvinenko. What we see now is giving that idea a big push. If a strong critic of the Russian president is murdered almost everyone points to exactly that one. The way the media presented the case hardly anybody thought in a different direction. The setup is most likely and has served the demonization of the Russian regime „well“.

The fact that those Russians who had contact with Litvineneko, former KGB agents Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun, and who were named as suspects in the murder case were not extradicted was presented by some media as a proof of Kremlin´s involvement. But what was put forward was rather meager the more since Lugovoi had himself symptoms of contamination (which a professional murderer would by all means have avoided, just like the broad trail through Europe). In fact Litvinenko´s father accuses two other man of having murdered his son: the Oligarch Boris Berezovsky and his close associate Alex Goldfarb, the later in fact being a Russian-American Microbiologist.

Anyway, if Polonium was used „sucessfully“ and without being detected for quite some time in the case of Arafat by Israel´s secret services – most probably with the the help of a Palestinian traitor – why not use it for a clever setup, might have been the idea. One can hardly count on a proof for the connection of the two cases but it appears quite legitimate to talk about these assumptions. Nevertheless it can not be ruled out, that one day we stumble over another event giving harder evidence to the proposed connection.

Andreas Schlüter

1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-490007/Revealed-Poisoned-ex-Russian-spy-Litvinenko-WAS-paid-MI6-agent.html

2. http://www.dielinke-tempelhof-schoeneberg.de/fileadmin/tempelhof-schoeneberg/lupe/2007/Lupe0701.pdf (scroling page down)

3. http://technit.blogspot.de/2006/12/alexander-litvinenko-and-polonium.html

4. http://www.aljazeera.com/video/asia-pacific/2012/07/2012746748407858.html

5. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-assassination-of-yasser-arafat-was-ordered-by-the-israeli-cabinet-we-will-choose-the-right-way-and-the-right-time-to-kill-arafat/5357121

Africa Under Attack! And the Refugees? May Get Drowned!

 

Let´s be frank, what is on the agenda for Africa on the side of the Western Power Elites is clearly to be seen. After the official end of colonialism only French troops were to be seen in Africa. Today by and large Western colonial troops or international troops directly or indirectly under Western control are back on the continent in numbers!  Likewise African puppets and their armed gangs are used to plunder and destabilize great parts of Africa, as for example happens with Congo where Kagame and Museveni after the Rwanda tragedy (1) let their troops loot and rape (2). The riches of Congo are exploited through slave labor organized by warlords, almost like Congo was plundered during Leopold´s “private” colonialism (3). Since Leopold II the Western activities have cost Congo between 15 and 20 millions of dead. Ethnic groups are armed by the West and played against each other like in the 19^th century.

Direct Western military interventions have struck Ivory Coast, Libya and Mali. The new military race through Africa was started with the US Somalia adventure covered by “humanitarian” aims after a lot was done to destabilize the Horn of Africa. The US have their military colonial institution of US AFRICOM (4) located in Stuttgart (shame on Germany)! The aims of the decolonization time manifested in the formation of OAU (5) are forgotten respectively turned into their opposite (6).

But the war on Africa isn´t only waged by openly military means. A systematic crippling of all efforts to develop the continent by means of industrialization is to be found in the installation of the “free trade religion”. Every country boasting today of a highly developed industry has achieved that by means of protective customs. Africa has been barred of such measures and even its agriculture is more and more crippled by the forced imports of highly state supported agricultural imports from industrialized countries. The fishing grounds of West Africa as well as East Africa are swept empty by fishing fleets from the Northern Hemisphere. Fishermen can only survive either by transporting people fleeing the continent to Europe or by becoming Pirates!

All this could only have been “achieved” by eliminating or “neutralizing” the progressive personalities and movements who had a sound vision for true African independence, like Patrice Lumumba (7), Kwame Nkrumah (8)  Eduardo Mondlane (9), Samora Machel (10), Thomas Sankara (11) and last not least Muammar Gaddafi (12) as well as others. Many times compradors stepped in and installed western controlled puppet regimes. With the downfall of the East block all chances to maneuver against the Western economic and political power broke away. WTO (13) and IMF (14) are means of imperialism to keep Africa down. They forced extended privatization even of the most basic economic activities like water supply on many African societies.

Western media are part of that war. They permanently present a picture of “African barbarism” to blame the African societies for their miserable conditions. “50 years you´re independent but you´re not capable of managing your own affairs” are by and large their open or hidden slogans. Many times the West is trying to pull Africans to the international court where you´ll never see people like Clinton and Albright, mostly responsible for Rwanda´s and Congo´s tragedies (15) or Bush and Cheney with their terrorist wars! And sad, even a whole number of Africans fall into the trap of psychological manipulation – blaming the African continent itself for its miserable condition.

And many people try to escape from the Western produced hell, taking any chance to board on a boat that hardly meets any safety standards for the voyage over the open sea. Thousands got drowned already either on their trip from Senegal´s coast to the Canary Islands or from Tunisia, Libya or else to Italy, especially the small Island Lampedusa. If they prefer to go by land, to cross Sinai, they get into another hell for them, Israel (16). But Europe respectively the West – benefiting materially from the plunder of Africa – only accepts Africans (or refugees from Near East, as for that matter) if they arrive dead – then they´ll get a state burial (17). If you get there alive, you´ll be charged! All following the principle: only a dead refugee is a good refugee!

One might be astonished to hear these accusations from a (66 years old) “Child” of Germany, of Europe, of the West, but as much as I have unwillingly “enjoyed” the fruits of Western Imperialism,  having lived in a country with so much historical guilt, I have to stand up and shout: NOT IN MY NAME!

And I have to say one thing to my African friends: I can never advise how to free Africa, but one thing I´m sure of, Africa will never develop WITH the West, but only AGAINST the West, keep that in mind!

Andreas Schlüter

1. http://www.blackstarnews.com/news/135/ARTICLE/5831/2009-07-03.html this links doesn´t work anymore, see text below links

2. http://blackagendareport.com/content/profitable-genocide-rwanda-and-uganda-annex-eastern-congo

3. https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/crimes-on-congo-part-1-from-destruction-to-destroyed-independence/

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Africa_Command

5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_of_African_Unity

6. https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2013/05/25/africa-50-years-ago-the-foundation-of-the-oau/

7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrice_Lumumba

8. http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/history/cia_nkrumah.php

9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Mondlane

10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samora_Machel

11. https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/aziz-fall-about-the-killing-of-a-great-african-thomas-sankara/

12. http://libya360.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/after-libya-nato-intervention-threatens-to-destabilize-entire-region/

13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organization

14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Monetary_Fund

15. http://blackagendareport.com/content/profitable-genocide-rwanda-and-uganda-annex-eastern-congo

16. http://politicalblindspot.com/the-rise-of-anti-black-racism-in-israel /

17. http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/oct/14/lampedusa-ceremony-burial-dead-migrants-video

18. Text:

    The Hidden Story Behind Rwanda’s Tragedy

    By Christopher Black

1. Editor’s Note: The Op-Ed is written by a Canadian attorney who represents a defendant before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Arusha, Tanzania, on war crimes charges. The attorney offers a counter-view to the one-sided representation of the Rwanda narrative. Readers are encouraged to submit their comments and reactions.
   Rwanda before 1990 was considered the Switzerland of Africa, a model of social development.
   The result of the 1959 social revolution that deposed the Tutsi monarchy and aristocracy and freed the majority Hutu population from serfdom and a lifetime of humiliation was the establishment of a collective society in which both Hutus, and Tutsis as well as Twas lived together in relative harmony.
   Tutsis were members of the government, its administration, present in large numbers in the education system, the judiciary and controlled most of the large private commercial companies in Rwanda.
   The Rwandan army was a multiethnic army composed of both Hutus and Tutsis and it stayed a multiethnic force even when the Rwandan Army was forced by the invaders from Uganda to retreat into the Congo forest in July 1994 because it ran out of ammunition due to the Western embargo on arms and supplies.
   Rwanda descended into chaos in 1990 when the self-described Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) forces launched a surprise attack on October 1, 1990 from Uganda. In fact, every one of the men and officers of that invasion force were members of the Ugandan national Army.
   It was an invasion by Uganda disguised as an independent force of “liberation”. Liberation from what, has never been stated.
   Initially the justification put out by the RPF was that of attaining the return of Tutsi “refugees” from Uganda to Rwanda. However, that problem had been resolved by an agreement between the RPF, Uganda, Rwanda, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the OAU a few weeks earlier. The Rwandan government had agreed to the return of all those Tutsis in Uganda who wanted to return to Rwanda.
   That accord required that Tutsi representatives of the refugees travel to Kigali for a meeting to determine the mechanics of that population movement, and how to accommodate all those people in a small country. They were expected at the end of September 1990. They never arrived.
   Instead of civilians returning in peace, Rwanda was viciously attacked on October 1, 1990 by a force that unleashed unbridled savagery. During that invasion the RPF forces of the Ugandan Army slaughtered everyone in their path, Hutu or Tutsi. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians, the majority Hutu, were butchered. These crimes have never been accounted for.
   The RPF’s favorite method was the bayonet or knife with which they disembowelled men and women or to tied their hands behind their backs and smashed their skulls with hoes, the farm tool iconic of the Hutu peasantry.
   After several weeks of intense fighting, the RPF forces were destroyed by the small Rwandan Army and the remnants fled, on US instructions, back into Uganda to regroup and reorganize.
   The RPF still never justified this aggression and the needless slaughter of civilians in a peaceful country. Individual Tutsis had always been allowed to return to Rwanda from the early 1960s and several times the Rwandan government invited them all to return. However the Tutsi aristocracy, jealous of its lost power and which viewed the Hutus as nothing but subhuman, refused to return unless their absolute power was restored. This the people of Rwanda, even the Tutsis who remained in the country, refused.
   In the 1960s and early 1970s various Tutsi groups in Uganda and elsewhere had organized terrorist raids into Rwanda in which they murdered without pity anyone they caught. These raids were repelled by Rwanda’s tiny armed forces. The years that followed were a period of development and peace for Rwandans. Even though one of the smallest and poorest countries in the world it had the best road system, healthcare, and education systems in Africa. Until the late 1980s it prospered and received help from both the socialist countries of the USSR, North Korea and China and West Germany, France and Israel and others.
   Some Tutsis in Uganda became involved in the civil wars there between the socialist Milton Obote and the US- and UK puppet Yoweri K. Museveni who was supported by the West to get rid of socialism in Uganda. By 1990 Tutsis composed a large section of the Ugandan Army and all the senior officers of the RPF were high officers in the Ugandan Army, the National Resistance Army. Paul Kagame himself was one of the highest-ranking officers in the intelligence services of the Ugandan army and was notorious for enjoying torturing prisoners.
   Rwanda until 1990 was a one party socialist state. The ruling party the National Movement For revolutionary Development (MRND) was not considered a party as such but rather a social movement in which everyone in society took part through local elections and the mechanism of consensus much like the system in Cuba.
   The fall of the Soviet Union led to pressure from the West, notably the United States and France to dismantle the one party state system and permit multiparty democracy.
   The President, Juvenal Habyarimana, instead of resisting, agreed to a change in the constitution and in 1991 Rwanda became a multiparty democracy. The fact the Rwandan government did this in the middle of a war is more than remarkable. It was also an offer of peace. The RPF, since its abject failure in 1990, had changed its strategy from a frontal assault to the tactics of terrorism.
   The RPF likes to refer to this phase as the guerrilla. However, it was not the guerrilla of a liberation struggle like the FLMN in Vietnam or the FARC in Colombia. It was instead a mirror image of the Contras campaign of terrorism conducted against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. Its purpose was not to make revolution. Its purpose was to overthrow the 1959 revolution. And, like the contras, the RPF was supported by the United States.
   This was clear from the beginning of the war.
   When the RPF launched their attack, President Juvenal Habyarimana was in Washington, lured out of the way, by the State Department. The evidence that the US was aware of and supported the October surprise attack was the US Administration’s offer to Habyarimana of asylum in the United States if he surrendered power to the RPF.
   Habyarimana refused and immediately flew back home. There was no condemnation of the Ugandan-RPF aggression by the United States, a matter which France raised at the United Nations, or any of its allies despite the big noise they made at the same time about the advance of Iraqi forces into Kuwait. Further, the Rwanda ambassador to the UN, then on the Security Council, filed a protest in the Security Council but the US had it taken off the agenda.
   In fact the US and its allies supported the aggression against Rwanda from the beginning and US Special Forces operated with the RPF from the beginning. Recently, while former president Bill Clinton was in Toronto, he denied any involvement in Rwanda–this is one of the big lies of the century. Clinton and George W. Bush are up to their necks in the blood of the Rwandan and Congolese people.
   With the arrival of multiparty democracy in 1991, the RPF took full advantage and created several front parties to take away support from the popular MRND. These parties though claiming to represent different political views in fact were, in the main front parties for the RPF.
   The press was expanded and many of the new papers were financed by and acted as mouthpieces for the RPF. At the same time as these parties sprang up, criticizing the government, the RPF continued its terror campaign: planting mines on roads that killed Hutu and Tutsi alike; assassinating politicians and officials; and, blaming it, with the help of various NGOs funded by western intelligence agencies, on the government.
   In 1992 a coalition government was formed with the RPF or its front parties seizing control of key ministries and appointing the prime minister. Through these agents they also controlled the civilian intelligence services that they then began to dismantle. The RPF engaged in a “talk and fight” strategy. Always agreeing to a ceasefire, pressing for more power, then launching new attacks on civilians. The most egregious was their breaking of the ceasefire and their major offensive in February 1993 in which they seized the major town of Ruhengeri in the process murdering 40,000 civilians most of them Hutu.
   The Rwandan Army, even though hamstrung by the civilian ministries that were controlled by the RPF, managed to drive the RPF back. Finally in August 1993 the Arusha Accords were signed under pressure from the United States and its allies in which the RPF obtained major concessions in return to the formation of a broad-based transition government to be followed by general elections.
   However, they knew they could not win such elections as the RPF was not only unpopular with the majority Hutu population it did not even enjoy the support of many internal Tutsis whose lives and businesses had been destroyed by the war they did not see a need for.
   Instead of preparing for elections the RPF prepared for their final offensive. As far back as December 1993, UN reports document the massive build-up of men and weapons coming in from Uganda. The UN force that was deployed supposedly to ensure a peaceful transition; in fact, it was a cover for the US and its allies to assist in this build up.
   General Roméo Dallaire, the Canadian general in charge of the UN force hid this build up from the Rwandan army and the President. The build-up was accompanied by death threats against the president.
   According to an account of Habyarimana’s last conversation with president Mobutu Sese Seko of what was then Zaire, just two days before he was murdered, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State for African Affairs Herman Cohen had, in October 1993, told Habyarimana, that unless he ceded all power to the RPF they were going to kill him and drag his body through the streets.
   These threats were punctuated by the murder of the first Hutu president of neighboring Burundi, Melchior Ndadaye, by Tutsi officers in October 1993 in which Kagame and the RPF also had a hand; the officers who committed the murder, including Lieutenant Paul Kamana, later fled to Uganda. Ndadaye was in office a mere four months, having won the country’s first free elections. In the aftermath of that murder 250,000 Hutus were massacred by the Tutsi army of Burundi and hundreds of thousands of Hutus fled to Rwanda.
   The result of the 1993 offensive was that one million Hutus fled the terror of the RPF in northern Rwanda towards the capital, Kigali, so that by April 1994 over a million refugees were encamped close to the capital and hundreds thousands more in camps in the south all fleeing RPF terror.
   The RPF did all it could in 1994 to paralyse the functioning of the government, to exacerbate racial tensions, and prepare for war.
   Then on April 6, 1994 they launched their final surprise attack by shooting down the presidential plane returning from a meeting in Tanzania that Uganda’s Museveni had arranged. In fact it is known that Museveni’s half-brother general Salim Saleh was at the final meeting at which the date for the shoot down was agreed.
   The missile attack killed Habyarimana, as well as Burundi’s new Hutu president Cyprien Ntayamire, and Rwanda’s military chief of staff, and others on board. This was the first massacre of 1994 and it was a massacre of Hutus by the RPF.
   The RPF then immediately launched attacks across Kigali and the north of the country. In the sector of Kigali known as Remera they killed everyone on the night of the 6th and the 7th, wiped out the Gendarme camp there, wiped out the military police camp at Kami and launched a major attack against Camp Kanombe, Camp Kigali and the main gendarme camp at Kacyriu.
   The Rwandan government and army called for a ceasefire the same night and next day. The RPF rejected the call. The Rwandan government asked for more UN help to control the situation. Instead, the US arranged that the main UN force be pulled out while flying in men and supplies to the RPF using C130 Hercules aircraft.
   The Rwandan Army, short of ammunition and unable to contain the RPF advances even offered an unconditional surrender on April 12th. The RPF rejected even this offer and instead shelled the Nyacyonga refugee camp where the one million Hutu refugees were located provoking their flight into the capital.
   The effect of one million people flooding into a small city that itself was under bombardment cannot be described. The RPF used this flood of people to infiltrate its men behind army lines. This created panic among the Hutu population that began killing anyone they did not recognize. It was clear that the RPF was not interested in saving lives, even Tutsis, but in seizing total power and did not want to negotiate at all.
   The late Dr. Alison Des Forges, the American who was considered a noted scholar on Rwanda, in her testimony in the Military II trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 2006 testified that the RPF claim that they attacked to stop a “genocide” was a myth; just propaganda to justify their attempt to seize power by force of arms.
   She also testified that the Rwandan government did not plan and execute genocide. This accords with the testimony of General Dallaire who also confirmed an earlier statement that there was no planned genocide by the government as did the deputy head of Belgian Army intelligence, Col. Vincent, who also testified at the ICTR that the idea of a genocide was a fantasy.
   The fighting in Kigali was intense. UN officers –confirming what has been said by Rwandan and RPF officers who have testified— state that the RPF was launching hundreds of Katyusha rockets every hour round the clock while the Rwandan Army ran out of hand grenades in the first few days and was reduced to fighting the RPF with hand made explosives.
   The vaunted RPF could not take Kigali. The siege of Kigali lasted three months and only ended when the Rwandan Army literally ran out of ammunition and ordered a general retreat into the Congo forest.
   RPF officers have stated that the RPF killed up to two million Hutus in those 12 weeks in a deliberate campaign to eliminate the Hutu population. The Akagera River, the length of which was under RPF control throughout, ran red with the blood of the Hutus massacred on its banks.
   The RPF claimed these were Tutsis but there were no Tutsis in that area and only the RPF had access to that area. Robert Gersony, of USAID in a report to the UNHCR in October 1994, filed as an exhibit at the ICTR, stated that the RFP carried out a systematic and planned massacre of the Hutu population. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gersony
   As the Rwandan Army, including Tutsi officers within that army and men retreated into the Congo forest, the Hutu population, in fear for their lives fled with them in their millions. In local villages, Hutu neighbours attacked Tutsis in revenge for the murder of Hutus or fearing death at their hands. Tutsis also attacked Hutus. It was total war just as the RPF wished. The RPF later pursued the Hutus through the Congo forest between 1996 to 1998 and killed hundreds of thousands and possibly millions. They were shelled, machine gunned, raped, cut to pieces with knives. Accounts of that trek are difficult to bear.
   The RPF was assisted in its offensive by the United States. The UN Rwanda Emergency office in Nairobi was in fact manned by US Army officers and acted as the operational headquarters of the RPF and gave them intelligence on Rwandan Army movements and actions and directions.
   Prudence Bushnell the U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs telephoned the Rwandan Army chief of staff in May 1994 and told him that unless he surrendered he must know that he was fighting the United States of America and would be defeated. US Special Forces fought with the RPF. There is also evidence that Belgian forces of the UN were involved as an intercepted radio message from Kagame to his forces in the field refers to the help they had received from the Belgians.
   There is also evidence that Canadian forces were also involved and Atoine Nyetera a Tutsi prince, who was in Kigali in that period testified for the defense in the Military II trial and stated that not only were there no massacres committed against Tutsis by the Rwandan Army but that it was the RPF that began the massacres after they took Kigali and began killing Hutus.
   Nyetera testified that despite the claim by the RPF of being a Tutsi liberation group, when he saw their long columns enter the capital he saw that most of them were Sudanese, Eritreans, Ethiopians, Tanzanians and others speaking Swahili or Sudanese languages, in other words, mercenaries.
   Several RPF officers have testified at the ICTR and stated that they fled the Kagame regime as they had been promised that they fought for liberation of the Tutsis. However, when they wanted to take over the streets of Kigali to stop reprisals against Tutsis by Hutu civilians the junior officers were forbidden to do so, putting the lie to Kagame’s claim that he attacked to save Tutsis.
   These officers testified that Kagame wanted deaths to justify his war. The RPF could have controlled large parts of Kigali as they had at least 15,000 men in or near the capital opposed to 5,000 Rwandan Army forces. Instead Kagame used his men to ethnically cleanse the rest of the country of the Hutu population.
   The Rwanda War was a total war. All means were used to destroy that country and the Hutu people. The ultimate objective, the resources of the Congo. The US agreed to support the RPF in return for the RPF acting as a US proxy force to invade the Congo and seize its resources.
   The US now has several military bases in Rwanda and the country is nothing more than a US and UK colony run by thugs who keep control of the majority of the people by intimidation, murder and disinformation.
   None of this could have happened if those in the UN such as Kofi Anan, then in charge of the Department of peacekeeping operations, had done his job. None of this could have happened without the connivance of the NATO countries and Uganda, from where the invasion was launched.
   Ultimately, the prime responsibility rests with the United States of America and in particular the regimes of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and now President Barack Obama. As Boutros Boutros-Ghali, then UN Secretary General, stated to Canadian historian Robin Philpot in 2004: “The United States is one hundred percent responsible for what happened in Rwanda.” Toronto-based Christopher Black is a Barrister and International Criminal Lawyer. He is Lead Counsel, General Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Chief of Staff, Rwandan Gendarmerie. International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda (ICTR).

   http://www.blackstarnews.com/news/135/ARTICLE/5831/2009-07-03.html