Mit ‘Russ Baker’ getaggte Beiträge

kennedy-picture

Heute vor 53 Jahren wurde JFK ermordet. Lang, lang ist´s her, aber der Vorgang ist weiterhin von größter Bedeutung, denn er zeigt, dass ein US-Präsident keinesfalls „der mächtigste Mann der Welt“ ist, allenfalls der „prächtigste“. „Hinter dem Vorhang“ regiert die eigentliche US Machtelite mit dem „Tiefen Staat“. Mein Artikel von 2013 hat somit nichts von seiner Aktualität verloren:

Kennedys Ermordung: ein halbes Jahrhundert der Lügen“:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2013/11/23/kennedys-ermordung-ein-halbes-jahrhundert-lugen/

Andreas Schlüter

Meine Beiträge zu den USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/link-liste-meiner-artikel-zu-den-usa/

Advertisements

All over the world as in the USA itself many people have the suspicion that the democratic cover has degenerated to an empty masquerade. The talk of the elected US President as “the most powerful Man on Earth” is an empty phrase. He might still be “the most glamorous man on Earth”, but nothing more, since the power lies somewhere else, namely with the US Power Elite, which is today much smaller than it was in the days when C. Wright Mills has coined that word:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_Elite

The power elite is consisting of the wealthiest people together with the heads of “Intelligence” and the military. Coming from what President Eisenhower named the “Military-Industrial Complex” in his farewell address this small class has formed the “Deep State”, the power behind the curtain since long:

The named forces were struggling for dominance already in the times of FDR what surfaced with the aborted “Business Plot” against the President of the “New Deal” in the early Thirties for those who want to see (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/Coup.htm). Finally the ultimate power of the deep state manifested itself with the assassination of John F. Kennedy (http://tinyurl.com/ndzt8ho). This was possibly the most important “turning point” in US history, the more since the deed was covered up and the planers and perpetrators hidden behind the smoke screen of the “lone assassin” and the “magic bullet” from behind hitting the President into the front of his head:

Anybody who wants to understand how this hidden power is able to liquidate a President running “astray” by taking world peace serious and by not allowing militarism to run into the danger of “Armageddon” can rely on at least three books revealing the scary truth:

Family of Secrets” by Russ Baker:

(http://www.familyofsecrets.com/about-the-book/)

Mary´s Mosaic” by Peter Janney:

(http://www.marysmosaic.net/)

and

The Devil´s Chessboard” by David Talbot

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/24723229-the-devil-s-chessboard

Family of Secrets” by Russ Baker – a renowned investigative journalist – deals a lot with the events directly connected to the murder of the President. It connects a member of the most prominent dynasties of the US more or less directly to the assassination: George H. Bush! The book reveals a network of culprits in the oil industry, the administration, in the “Intelligence” and the Mafia – connected to the project of toppling Castro´s regime in Cuba – being linked to the ruthless murder. Though not being the first book on the topic connecting the “deep state” to the murder this monumental research work demands a lot from the reader since an enormous number of people, their backgrounds and intermingling are presented. And it offers more to the reader since it lays the family history of the Bushes before and after Kennedy´s assassination bare. The insight is as frightening as necessary to see clearly: the assassination was an “inside job”.

The book “Mary Pinchot Meyer” shows another facet of the Power Elite´s ruthless attitude. Even people who were individually not involved into politics but have crossed the way of the slain President could easily be targeted if asking too many questions and knowing too much, so Kennedy´s mistress of his last years, Mary Pinchot Meyer. She has obviously been an inspiration to the late President and didn´t want to accept the cover up of her lover´s murder. That was her death sentence.

See also https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/12/17/marys-mosaic-looking-into-an-abyss-part-ii/ ).

The Devil´s Chess Board, Allen Dulles, the CIA,
and the Rise of America´s Secret Government”

the-devils-chessboard

The third book, written by David Talbot, goes deep into the planning center of the murderous activities and gives a view into the secret power from another perspective. At the center of the group, that planned such brutal actions stood the head of the CIA, Allen Dulles.

allen-dulles-young-age

Allen Dulles as a Young Man

This man, who could rightfully be called a devil, looks on a photo taken around his wedding in 1920 very harmless, sensible, in deed almost pious like a clergyman and not like the future director of a “Murder Inc.”. But so should the CIA, founded in 1947, in deed be called. In fact long before the foundation of the CIA Dulles was involved in secret service operations and to a high extend in deep cooperation with the German Nazis. The law company – Sullivan and Cromwell – which Allen and his brother John Foster Dulles – later Secretary of Foreign Affairs – served was closely linked to German capital. Those interests had high priority for the brothers even in times of WW II.

allen-dulles

Allen Dulles

All this not really astonishing taking into consideration that parts of the US Power Elite did a lot to bring the Nazis into power, well exposed by the book “The Wall Street and Hitler” by Anthony C. Sutton (http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/). Those circles used the Nazis to kick the British out of the imperial competition and to make sure that the Soviet Union would be bombed into Stone Age. Surely they didn´t want the Nazis to rule the world but stopped the “Show” when the aims were reached, leaving millions dead.

Intrusion: When Netanyahu claimed that Hitler wasn´t originally planning the total extinction of Europe´s Jewish population but had been convinced to do so by Jerusalem´s Mufti (https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-anti-semite-no-1-rewrites-history-or-so/), the absurd smearing of a Palestinian who could hardly have had such influence on the Nazi No 1, might have covered another cabal. The close contact of Dulles and his like with high ranking Nazis in Switzerland might have had its influence on the Nazis perception of US politics towards the European war theatre. The Dulles brothers hated the FDR administration and their New Deal policy, which had a whole number of Jewish supporters. They might have tried a lot to make the Nazis believe that it was the “Jewish influence” that made the US supporting Great Britain and the Soviet Union and prevent Germany´s victory over them. The Dulles Brothers and their associates could thus keep their good business relations with big German companies which in fact prevailed during the war almost to the end. That this might have had a strengthening and fatal influence on the monstrous Nazi extinction agenda is much more likely than Netanyahu´s absurd allegations of the Mufti.

Anti-Communism was the dominant guide line of the Dulles gang. In fact Allen Dulles wanted former Nazis to play an even more important role in post war Germany as “junior partners” than in fact they did. So was Nazi General Gehlen used to organize the German secret service. US secret services helped high ranking Nazis to escape via the “Rat Line” especially to South America (like Barbie, the “butcher of Lyon”), were in fact a whole number “served” them well in supporting fascist regimes at the strings of the US. Latin America was considered the “back yard” of the US by the power elite and any shift to socially oriented policy was dubbed socialist or communist. This Jacobo Arbenz, the President of Guatemala had to learn in 1954. His fate was later on a lesson for Castro and the Cuban Revolution.

In fact the concept was clear: wherever the arm of the US power could reach, socially minded concepts wouldn´t be tolerated. Wherever people wanted to free themselves from exploitation US interests were “at stake”. They planned many times to kill Castro. In case of Congo´s Lumumba they “succeeded”, plunging millions of his country men into misery and death. They followed the principle: “if you don´t want to be exploited by us, you´re our enemy!” Dulles and his circle were not saving their West European allies from brutal methods to keep them “in line”. They build the “Gladio” network, using terror attacks to be blamed on leftist organizations. De Gaulle kicked the network out of France. The CIA undertook a number of attempts on his life.

How ruthless Dulles was is also to be seen by his readiness to use people whom he even knew personally for his plans at their cost. The Quaker relief worker Noel Field was a harmless idealist. He got a call for a teaching job at the University in Prague 1950. Dulles used his contacts to make Eastern intelligence belief Field would head a US spy ring. This triggered Stalin´s paranoia. It did not only lead to Field´s long imprisonment as well as of family members but to a wave of increased repression, which was Dulles aim in his concept to nourish Eastern resistance.

A special “case” for Dulles was John F. Kennedy, whom he got to know as a young Senator. Dulles thought the young man would remain “his pupil” as Kennedy liked to know the views of the Dulles brothers. But by the time it turned out that Kennedy was of quite different views. And when Dulles CIA organized Lumumba´s assassination, Kennedy was highly upset, in fact getting to know about the event much later. And then there came the “Bay of Pigs” disaster, which was sort of a trap for the young President who had fallen to the idea it was rather a “Cuban affair”. Seeing the full dimension of the affair he deposed Dulles as head of the CIA.

This decision didn´t mean Alan Dulles wouldn´t have had influence in the CIA anymore. The organization was already too much of a Dulles Mafia as to submit to formalities. But it was the right instrument for those circles in the US Power Elite of the type which today are called “Neocons”, to deal with the President according to their fury over Kennedy´s peace orientation. Kennedy´s wise decision to end the Cuba crisis by also taking nuclear warheads out of Turkey instead of allowing “Operation Northwoods” and his stand against the “Military Industrial Complex”, expressed in a famous speech, drove those forces mad:

It was the determination of the President not to allow power and profit thirsty war mongers to gamble with the fate of mankind that sealed his fate. Another detail is also very special. Vice President Johnson – being near to the US oil barons – was asked why he was accepting to be Number 2 “on the ticket” for the election with Kennedy by one Clare Booth Luce. He answered: “One out of every four Presidents has died in office, I´m a gambling man, darlin´.” He “won” the bet!

In fact Dulles was Johnson´s first choice for heading the commission to “investigate” the President´s assassination, but then Earl Warren was made head to deflect liberal skepticism. Nevertheless Dulles hardly missed any meeting of the commission he was part of. The results were as ridicules in face of the “Zapruder Film” as can be seen. The President´s head thrown back by a mysterious projectile “from behind”:

jfk-deadly-shot-2

For the conspirators – Dulles being one of their heads – JFK´s brother Robert was the most dangerous person, not only as Secretary of Justice, but the more when he decided to run for President, determined to find out who really killed his brother. On June 4th 1968 he had to share his brother´s fate. The said assassin was so disoriented that the likeliness to be a “Patsy” seems overwhelming. One might well think of the CIA´s programs for “Mind Control”, Project MKUltra.

angelton

James Jesus Angelton

Unlike those men Dulles hated so much, he died a “natural” death: on January 29th 1969 Dulles died of a complicating pneumonia. Also his devout henchman and CIA´s counterintelligence “wizard”, James Jesus Angelton (what a name by the way) and deeply involved into the death of Mary Pinchot Meyer, died of lung cancer in 1987. But he must be credited for knowing what kind of guy he was. Short time before his death he talked about Dulles and the associates Wisner and Helms and that they “would deservedly end up in hell”. And he added: “I guess that I will see them there soon”!

Andreas Schlüter

Further Links:

on Kennedy:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2013/11/22/assassination-of-jfk-half-a-century-of-lies/

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/kennedy-and-%e2%80%9eno-change/

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/kennedy%c2%b4s-assassination-in-a-clearer-light/

My articles on the USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/list-of-my-articles-on-the-usa/

If you want to see, how in the US „the deep state“ is at work, how the US Power Elite is working via their „Intelligence“ structures with impunity against all constitutional and legal frames, you´ve got to read „Family of Secrets“ by Russ Baker (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/about-the-book/) on the assassination of Kennedy and on the Bush Clan. I´ve mentioned that book in some articles (http://tinyurl.com/9hxxkah & http://tinyurl.com/ndzt8ho) on this internet blog. The well researched book is a „must read“ if you want to look into the „power machine“ of the US. One might say, Kennedy´s assassination was half a century ago, so what? But believe it, the degeneration of morals in the really powerful inside the US has rather speeded up.

The Tragedy´s Second Part

In context with Kennedy´s assassination more murders took place, as for example the „patsy“ Oswald, but another one is also outstanding. Mary Pinchot Meyer, Kennedy´s most important extramarital „affair“, was murdered less than a year after her lover. Not only that she obviously had have a great influence on the President in turning him away from Cold War and its risks (which infuriated an important section of the US Power Elite), but she knew a lot about his adversaries and was infuriated about the gigantic „cover up“ represented by the „Warren Commission” and threatened to speak out in public. This was not to be! She was murdered on a walk, the deed was to be presented as a “deadly sexual assault” fixed to a helpless black “patsy”. By a brilliant African American lawyer, Dovey Johnson Roundtree, this attempt was smashed, the patsy acquitted without finding the true killer. But the case got also more delayed attention (beyond the fact that her affair had been written about a couple of years later).

Mary´s Mosaic” by Peter Janney

mary_s-mosaic

http://www.marysmosaic.net/

Someone also going deep into the case was Peter Janney. The best friend of one of her sons, who died age nine, and deeply impressed by his friend´s mother and her personality could not forget the case happening when he was a teenager. The later on clinical psychologist was indeed almost haunted by the terrible crime on his idol. With criminal cases and teams working on them usually people being involved with the victim or the evil doer are with good reasons excluded from the case. But (being dramaturgically at times exploited in criminal thrillers) a personal involvement can also deliver the obsession which is sometimes needed to take the pain and hardship to get on the bottom of overall complicated cases. Now he was not only a boyish admirer of his dead friend´s mother but also found out that his father – a high ranking CIA man as well as Mary´s ex husband likewise – were also strangely involved into the case. Mary Pinchot Meyer was a “society Lady”, being “one of them”, but “there are limits”. So obviously also to her former class mate James Angleton, high, high up in the CIA hierarchy thought. Janney invested an enormous energy and was surely also at risk with his researches to find most of the clues of the case.

No doubt, the personal affection with Janney has affected his style of writing at times in a way which could be seen as negative in as far as he tends to idealize Mary Pinchot Meyer and her lover as well. Also some details coming from his affection lengthen the book making it more difficult for the reader (with time shortage) to follow, but it must be admitted, unlike in Kennedy´s case, who fascinated so many people, perhaps it needed exactly Janney´s personal involvement to put that much energy into the case of the far less prominent Mary Pinchot Meyer!

Hear the man himself:

http://wn.com/peter_janney_and_mary’s_mosaic_-_interview

Anyway, Christmas ahead, buy the book (http://solari.com/blog/marys-mosaic/) for yourself and/or for politically interested relatives and friends! Read it, I guess you won´t regret!

Andreas Schlüter

kennedy-picture

Vor 50 Jahren glaubte ich noch daran, dass die USA das „Mutterland“ des Antifaschismus´ (http://tinyurl.com/bqqdwmv) seien, sowie daran, dass die USA dabei seien, den eigenen Rassismus und andere Übel zu überwinden. Dazu war ich fasziniert vom technischen Fortschritt dieses Landes. Es hätte nicht viel gefehlt und ich hätte Kennedys historischen Satz „ich bin ein Berliner“ mit dem eigenen Satz beantwortet: „ich bin ein Amerikaner!“. Wer allerdings meinen Blog kennt (http://tinyurl.com/cyk4mj8), weiß, dass sich dass schon seit langem gegeben hat. Damals, als Kennedy am 22. November 1963 ermordet wurde, war ich so wie viele – gerade jüngere – Menschen zutiefst schockiert, stellte aber mit 16 Jahren die „offiziellen“ Erklärungen der Mordtat nicht in Frage – wie ebenfalls viele Menschen. Schockiert bin ich immer noch, ohne jede Verklärung Kennedys.

Heute aber bin ich insbesondere davon schockiert, wie es sowohl in der US-Gesellschaft als auch in der unsrigen möglich ist, ein halbes Jahrhundert (auch gegen eine große Zahl von Menschen in beiden Gesellschaften) die Lüge vom Einzeltäter (oder auch einem von zwei Tätern) und die dreiste Leugnung der Beteiligung von politischen Kräften in den USA „offiziell“ aufrecht zu erhalten. Die Flut der Berichte im Fernsehen verstärken mit dem erbarmungslosen „Flachsinn“ diesen Schock noch einmal erheblich! Manch einer mag sich, wie unlängst ein Verwandter von mir, fragen, warum es mich überhaupt bewegt? Was macht das Thema für einen politisch interessierten Menschen so wichtig, die zu dem Ereignis weiter bestehenden Fragen zu durchdringen?

jfk-deadly-shot-2

Das einzig verbliebene wahre Imperium

Nach dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs waren die USA das einzig verbliebene kapitalistische – selbst, wenn man die Sowjetunion als (nicht-kapitalistisches) Imperium bezeichnen würde – Imperium, ungeachtet der Tatsache, dass es andere entstehende Mächte gibt. Wenn die USA etwas anderes wären als was sie vorgeben zu sein, sondern eben keine wirkliche Demokratie, dann wäre das eine alarmierende Situation; und, man sollte sich wirklich sorgen, sie sind schon lange keine Demokratie mehr! Und die wirklichen Mächte im Staat sind nicht die bekannten Kräfte, die normalerweise schlichter Reichtum und Wissensvorsprung mit sich bringen, auch nicht schlichte und offene Gewalt, wie das üblicherweise in der Geschichte gewesen ist. Die Kräfte, die die Demokratie zersetzten und die Macht übernommen haben, sind schon von Kennedy und seinem Vorgänger Dwight D. Eisenhower beschrieben worden. Man höre (bzw. lese in den Untertiteln) ihre Worte:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt0w8Dyg8uE&feature=related

Blau wird zu Orange gemacht

50 Jahre ist der Mord an Kennedy jetzt her. Wieder und wieder wurden und werden wir mit den offiziellen Theorien zur Ermordung Kennedys zugeschüttet, dem einzelnen Schützen (man räumte später vielleicht einen zweiten ein), offiziell als Lee Harvey Oswald identifiziert, der angeblich vom Schulbuchlager aus von hinten auf Kennedy schoss und offensichtlich Kennedy von vorne traf! Sogar diese schlichte Tatsache kann auf dem legendären „Zapruder-Film“ erkannt werden, der eindeutig zeigt, wie der von vorn kommende Schuss den Kopf des Präsidenten nach hinten wirft:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okroc9cs5cM&feature=related

Und sogar viele Berichte, die die offizielle Theorie in Frage stellen, ignorieren die Lösung, von wo der Schuss wirklich kam und flüchten sich statt dessen zu obskuren dunklen Flecken auf Fotos vom Grashügel, zu dem sich sogar Menschen direkt nach den Schüssen flüchteten. Tatsächlich kam der Schuss von unten aus der Kanalisation, wie sehr überzeugend nachgewiesen wurde:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related

sewage-system

Wenn also offensichtliche Tatsachen verdreht werden und blau zu orange gemacht wird, zu welchem Zweck geschieht dies? Und warum werden Leute, die klare Erkenntnisse über den Schuss von vorn herausarbeiten, systematisch ignoriert? Gab oder gibt es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA, um die Wahrheit zu verschleiern, oder gab es auch eine Verschwörung innerhalb der USA, um den Präsidenten zu töten? Hätte es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA gegeben, um eine ausländische Verschwörung zu verschleiern, vielleicht, um zu verhindern, dass dieser Vorfall zu einem Krieg führen könnte, wären alle Gründe zur Aufrechterhaltung der Vertuschung längst hinfällig. Der einzige Grund der Aufrechterhaltung dieser Vertuschung kann nur darin bestehen, dass das Attentat ein „Inside Job“ war, also eine Verschwörung von Kräften innerhalb der USA. Die Kreise, die diese Verschwörung zu verantworten haben, müssen genau die Mächte sein, die sowohl Eisenhower als auch Kennedy so bildhaft beschrieben haben!

family-of-secrets

„Family of Secrets“

Und zu denen wurden auch bereist hervorragende Recherchen von Russ Baker angestellt (wie auf diesem Blog schon dargestellt: http://tinyurl.com/79brs86 & http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl). Verwickelt ist offensichtlich auch der Bush-Clan, speziell „Poppy“ Bush, George H. Bush, früherer CIA-Direktor und späterer Präsident (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/). Die Vielen verborgene Geschichte von Prescott Bushs Sohn, dem 41. Präsidenten der USA, zeigt allerdings, dass man ein drittes Element, das geheimdienstliche, hinzufügen muss. Dem anheimelnden Spitznamen „Poppy“ Bush, der etwas Väterliches insinuiert, widerspricht dessen frühe, immer gut kaschierte Verwicklung in eben jenen Bereich, den des Geheimdienstes. So gut war die Tarnung seiner Tätigkeit dort, dass es mediales Erstaunen gab, als Poppy CIA-Direktor wurde. Dabei war dieses „gut“ und schier unentwirrbar mit seinem Tun in der Ölindustrie und anderen wertvollen Rohstoffen verbunden. Immer wieder stößt Baker auf Hinweise zu Bushs Geheimdiensttätigkeit, die andere geflissentlich übersehen haben. War schon Prescott Bush tief in imperialistische Machenschaften in Mittelamerika und der Karibik verwickelt, so hat George H. Bush seine Aktivitäten auf das entsetzliche Marcos-Regime in den Philippinen und in besonderem Maße auf Saudi-Arabien, unter anderem den Bin Laden Clan, ausgedehnt. Seine Präsidentschaft (die 41.) wurde mit dem Erreichen des langfristigen Zieles der Mächtigen in den USA, den Ostblock „totzurüsten“, sozusagen „gekrönt“.

George H. Bush, "Poppy"

George H. Bush, „Poppy“

Wo war ich?

Poppy gehört angeblich „zu den wenigen Menschen, die nicht wissen, wo sie zur Zeit von Kennedys Ermordung waren“, so zumindest gibt er vor. Tatsächlich war er am Morgen des Mordtages wohl in Dallas. Ein Hin und Her des Weges erzwingt regelrecht den Verdacht der Verschleierung einer Verbindung zum Geschehen. Dabei gibt es diverse persönliche Verbindungen seitens George H. Bushs zu Menschen, die direkt mit dem Geschehen verknüpft sind, und im öffentlichen Bewusstsein nicht präsent, obwohl grundsätzlich bekannt sind. Die Rolle Lee Harvey Oswalds ist angesichts der vielen Details wesentlich als die einer Figur zu sehen, die offenbar sehr gezielt ins Geschehen dirigiert wurde, um ihn als Sündenbock, als den fanatischen und wirren Einzeltäter, präsentieren zu können um ihn alsbald wieder „aus dem Verkehr zu ziehen“. Dabei ist es fast egal, ob Oswald einer unter mehreren Tätern oder der „reine“ Sündenbock (the „Patsy“) ist, denn es wäre ein unglaublicher „Zufall“, dass mehrere Verbindungen über sehr wenige Stationen von Poppy zu Oswald führen. Der Mörder von Oswald, Jack Ruby, hatte wiederum Verbindung zu CIA-Kreisen, die in Mordpläne gegen Castro verwickelt waren.

Ein markanter „Schutzherr“ von Oswald

Ein alter Freund von Poppy war George de Mohrenschildt, russischer Emigrant und als schillernde Figur im Ölgeschäft und auch im Bereich der „Dienste“ unterwegs, gleichzeitig eine zentrale Figur in der russischen Emigrantenszene von Dallas, die weitgehend der äußersten Rechten zuneigte. Gerade den jungen Oswald, ehemaliges Mitglied des Marine-Corps, der angeblich aus Sympathie für den Kommunismus in die Sowjetunion emigrierte, dort heiratete und dann „enttäuscht“ mit seiner Frau in die USA zurückkehrte, weiter aber angeblich große Sympathie für Kuba und Castro hegte, nahm de Mohrenschildt zeitaufwendig und intensiv unter seine „liebevollen“ Fittiche. Auch Oswalds Anstellung bei der Firma, die Räume in dem legendären Schulbuchlager hatte, ging auf einen Kontakt de Mohrenschildts zurück, sowie eine ganze Reihe weiterer Verwicklungen in die Sache. In den Siebzigern, also lange nach dem Attentat, wurde der alternde Mann dann offenbar von großer Gesprächigkeit befallen. Nach einer merkwürdigen Odyssee und verschiedenen Kontakten sowie einem Aufenthalt in der Psychiatrie verübte er dann am Nachmittag des 28. Mai 1977 „Selbstmord“. Schon weniger als zwei Wochen vorher war de Mohrenschildts alter Mentor, Paul Raigorodsky, (beide sollten vom „House Select Commitee on Assassinations“ des Kongresses zum Kennedy Attentat befragt werden) tot. Merkwürdig, auch, wenn der Tod des gichtkranken Raigowsky ein „natürlicher“ gewesen sein soll. Zu den Informationen, die de Mohrenschildt kurz vor seinem Tode einem holländischen Journalisten anvertraute, gehörte auch, dass er Jack Ruby gekannt hätte.

George de Mohrenschildt

George de Mohrenschildt

Ein weiterer Freund von Poppy

Ein weiterer Freund von Poppy, Jack Crichton, lokale Politgröße und Mitbesitzer des Schulbuchlagers, verbunden mit den Geheimdienstlern, die den Weg von Kennedys Konvoy festlegten, spielte auch nach dem Attentat eine wichtige Rolle bei der „Betreuung“ von Oswalds russischer Frau, um die ein enger „Gürtel“ gelegt wurde. Er organisierte auch die Dolmetscherin, die wesentlich an den belastenden Aussagen seiner Frau zu Oswald beteiligt war, was auch das Ziel hatte, Kuba in Verbindung mit dem Attentat zu bringen und leicht einen Raketenschlag auf den Inselstaat hätte auslösen können. Er war tatsächlich tief in geheimdienstliche Aktivitäten verwickelt und spielte in den Fünfzigern eine wichtige Rolle beim Aufbau der „Civil Defence Organization“, die Kalte-Kriegs-Hysterie schürte. Diese Organisation war auch an der Errichtung eines unterirdischen Kommando-Standes in Dallas beteiligt. Die erstaunlichen Verwicklungen aus dem „Dunstkreis“ von Poppy zum Attentatsgeschehen sind damit aber längst nicht erschöpft. Mit einem Wort, der „Zufälle“ sind im Zusammenhang mit der Ermordung Kennedys zu viele, um sie nicht als „Wunder“ zu klassifizieren, sollte er wirklich nichts mit Kennedys Tod zu tun haben.

Poppys Sohn, George W. Bush, fuhr mit Verschwörungen fort, manipulierend und lügend. Diese zwei Präsidentschaften waren die beiden Fälle, wo die „verborgenen Kräfte“ direkt „ihren Mann“ im Amt hatten, die Fälle, wo auch keine verborgenen Zügel nötig waren, an denen sie geführt wurden. Aber schließlich sahen zu viele Menschen allzu deutlich die Brutalität und imperiale Gier im Sohn, George W. Bush, personifiziert. Ein anderes Gesicht, eine andere Art von Persönlichkeit war als Repräsentanz des Imperiums und seiner Pseudodemokratie nötig.

Was also ist mit „Change“?

Seit der Ermordung Kennedys ist die wahre Macht in den USA für die offenkundig, die sehen wollen. Und seither wissen das die US Präsidenten auch. Die Tatsache, dass da verborgene Kräfte sind, die über das Schicksal des US-Präsidenten entscheiden alarmierte sogar „Tricky Dick“, Richard Nixon. Seine Forderungen, die geheimen Akten zu Kennedys Ermordung zur Einsicht zu erhalten, wurden schlicht ignoriert (siehe „Family of Secrets“, S. 244 ff). Spätestens nach der Amtseinführung werden sich US Präsidenten dieser bedrohlichen Tatsache bewusst. Aber insgesamt sind beide etablierten US Parteien tief in das Netz der Superreichen und ihres militärisch-industriell-geheimdienstlichen Komplexes verwoben. Obama mag wirklich einen Wandel im Sinn gehabt haben, während er dafür kämpfte, der „erste schwarze Präsident“ der USA zu werden. Aber sogar, als er noch eine klare Mehrheit hatte, versäumte er es, seine Versprechen umzusetzen. Es ist deutlich, dass ein wirklicher Wandel zum Besseren nur in einer breiten linken, also sozialen Bewegung, die sich zu kraftvollen politischen Partei entwickelt, liegen kann, so, wie es damals, leider vergeblich, Jesse Jackson (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson) mit seiner „Regenbogen-Koalition“ versuchte.

Präsident des Wandels?

Präsident des Wandels?

Kein Wandel ohne umfangreichen Kampf – und die Souveränitätsfrage

Vor dem Hintergrund dieser Ausführungen ist klar, dass das ominöse Netzwerk hinter den Vorhängen nicht aufgeben wird, und schon die Behandlung der „Occupy“-Bewegung mit umfangreicher Polizei-Brutalität, die Manipulationen des Wahlrechts sowie die neuen Überwachungs- und Internierungsgesetze  zeigen die wütende Entschlossenheit dieser Kreise. Das bedeutet nicht, dass es dort nicht unterschiedliche Sichtweisen und Konzepte gäbe, es ist kein wirklich monolithischer Block, vieles deutet darauf hin, dass es ein hgeftiges Ringen zwischen zwei Fraktionen der US Machtelite gibt. Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen der „Softpower-Fraktion“ (ein „orwellscher“ Name, denn auch diese scheuen sich nicht, ganze Volkswirtschaften zu erdrosseln, „lassen aber lieber machen“) und den Neocons nehmen in den letzten Jahren wieder enorm zu. Es scheint aber gerade bei den Neocons rote Linien zu geben, für deren Überschreitung ein US Präsident einen hohen Preis zu zahlen hätte.

Eine weitere wichtige Frage

Eine weitere wichtige Frage tut sich auf: wenn es, wofür nun so viel spricht, ein „Inside Job“ eines Teiles der US-Machtelite war, und so wenig wie die Öffentlichkeit über die Hintergründe erfährt, was wäre, wenn eine andere Macht durch geheimdienstliche Mittel die detaillierten Umstände kennte? Wieviel würde so einer ausländischen Macht damit an Erpressungspotential zuwachsen? Mir fällt dazu ein, dass Kennedy ein erbitterter Gegener der atomaren Bewaffnung Israels war (http://tinyurl.com/phgb48j). Nach Kennedy waren die USA bereit, diese gefährliche Entwicklung zu akzeptieren und 1967 wurde die Bindung außerordentlich eng, trotz des gezielten israelischen Angriffs auf die USS Liberty. Da ist allerdings der Gedanke nicht fern, wie dramatisch die Lage erst wäre, wenn eine andere Macht Einblick in einen etwaigen „Inside Job“ im Zusammenhang mit „Nine Eleven“ (http://tinyurl.com/3gy8otq) hätte!

Andreas Schlüter

http://www.uni-protokolle.de/Lexikon/Lee_Harvey_Oswald.html

jfk-deadly-shot-2

On the 22nd of November 1963 the US President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was shot and the US as well as many people all over the world were shocked, so was I.

Intrusion: I was 16 years old. At the beginning of that year we had moved from a northern suburb of Hamburg to Altona, a western part of Hamburg, near river Elbe. It was a time when I felt like answering JFK´s famous sentence „Ich bin ein Berliner“ with: „I´m an American!“. I was entrenched by the mainstream myths: the US are the motherland of Anti-Fascism and the US are doing away with Racism and are the „Land of the Free“. It fitted very well, I had fallen for the natural daughter of a Black WW II veteran living in a German family just round the corner. Unfortunately those days that was a very one sided affair (she loved me just like one would love a Mosqito), notwithstanding the fact that now since more than 16 years I´m harmoniously living together with exactly that Lady (but that is another – very private – story).

kennedy-picture

The hero of younger people in the West was murdered in face of many onlookers as well as soon after the release of the famous Zapruder film in face of millions. But also millions had seen the man presented as the assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, and the murder of him by Jack Ruby. Oswald was said to have shot Kennedy from a window of the  Texas School Book Depository . Those days TV and official presentations of the “facts” were not doubted by the broad public and neither by me. But time went by and many people learned a lot about the hidden side of the US, so did I.

oswald-ruby

In fact doubts came up, with some people early, but growing public doubts in the Warren Commission´s conclusion lead to another official inspection of the case, pushed also by the Church Committee. 1978 the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations didn´t rule out anymore that there was a conspiracy but insisted that all wounds on Kennedy and John Connally were done by Oswald. Admitting that there could have been a second gunman they strongly did rule out that the Soviet Union or Cuba might have been involved, but likewise ruled out that the organized crime as such would have been involved and strongly rejected any involvement of the Secret Service, the FBI and the CIA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0tZFkVhN00&list=PL30A9A32A38F3D52D

Click to see the Zapruder film with your own eyes

A view on the Case from today: blue turned into orange, what for?

It appears unbelievable that Oswald as the deadly shooter is upheld till today! How could that guy have managed to apply from behind a shot that obviously hits the President from the front, that´s even more phantastic than the so called Single bullet theory.

So, if obvious facts are distorted and blue turned into orange, for what purpose? And why are people working out the evidence of the shot from the front being ignored? Was or is there only a conspiracy to cover up the truth inside the US (in order not to „make people feel insecure“) or was there a conspiracy to kill the president on the side of forces inside the US? If there was a conspiracy to cover the fact that a foreign conspiracy has led to the murder of the president, a conspiracy to prevent the incident to turn into a war, all reasons to keep it up are gone. The only reason to carry on with this masquerade can lie in the fact that the assassination was an “inside job”! The official distortion of facts is the result of a conspiracy in order to cover up a US based conspiracy against the president. The people conspiring must necessary be located in high ranking levels, exactly in that strata that was warned of by JFK as well as Eisenhower:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_II0H7X5O4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dctr_MoQ2cA&feature=related

Irrespective of the mystification of John F. Kennedy by a number of people it has to be said that  possibly he was the last US President who felt a certain obligation to world peace though not being a “saint” at all as to be seen on many occasions. He did not only take the civil rights question a little more serious than his predecessors, he stopped the sliding into atomic war danger, but he also stopped the “home terror plans” of his chiefs of staffs (http://tinyurl.com/32cp3), thus refusing to invade Cuba and thus setting borders to the “Military Industrial complex” of which his predecessor Eisenhower had already warned. There are many indications that that this complex reacted by putting that president “off”. The answer to the question whether they did so raises the question for the real power in the US and the question what is to be expected from it.

family-of-secrets

Frightening details in connection to this question and the connection of the Bush clan and the Kennedy murder were revealed in the book “Family of Secrets” (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/) by the investigative journalist Russ Baker (http://russbaker.com/) as been reported on this blog before (http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl, in German). Former director of the CIA and former US President George H. Bush (nick name “Poppy”) played a shocking role in this drama. Among his friends was George de Mohrenschild, Russian émigré, geologist in the oil field and CIA man.

George de Mohrenschildt

George de Mohrenschildt

The deadly shot and the shooters

De Mohrenschild (http://tinyurl.com/yb82vwr), was a „fatherly friend” to Lee Harvey Oswald, “official” murderer of Kennedy. Which role Oswald ever may have played, whether introduced and integrated into the game by de Mohrenschild as a simple toy for confusion („I´m a patsy“) or as one of the shooters, he can´t have fired the deadly shot as a film documentation convincingly reveals: http://tinyurl.com/6sykmc7. There are also very strong indications for more shooters again: http://tinyurl.com/6w667sb. An eye witness to such additional shooters died under very dubious circumstances: http://tinyurl.com/7vuxwq2. After all it appears that the deadly shot came from the sewage System:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related

sewage-system

De Mohrenschild lateron became very talkative which may have lead to his strange “suicide” (http://tinyurl.com/d253daz) just before he was to be questioned again. By the way, Russ Baker was not the first to write about a connection of George H. Bush to the Kennedy assassination (http://tinyurl.com/3n9gcge).

Andreas Schlüter

More links to the topic:

Deep State USA: Dulles, Dallas and Devilish Games“: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/deep-state-usa-dulles-dallas-and-devilish-games/

http://krvs.org/post/inconsistencies-haunt-official-record-kennedys-death

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-1.html

http://www.themorningsun.com/government-and-politics/20131119/government-releases-fully-digitized-version-of-jfk-assassination-report

http://jfkassassinationconspiracyupdate.blogspot.de/p/oswald-not-killer-of-jfk.html

http://grahamsdownunderthoughts.blogspot.de/2011/11/lost-tapes-made-after-jfks.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_rtbeMgOPQ

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/kennedy-and-%e2%80%9eno-change/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQrqoj5pgQ

http://www.darktube.org/watch/russ-baker-on-media-journalism-family-of-secrets

No doubt, having read Marx´s “Capital” is a great help to understand Capitalism and its modern neoliberal variant (which is much of early untamed Capitalism). But as someone who wants to understand present day world politics a number of books is indispensable reading stuff. Some of them I would like to recommend here:

I) William Blum, “Killing Hope, US military and CIA Interventions since World War II”

The most powerful actor in World Politics is the United States of America. Not only during the Cold War they were and are practically in most parts of the World intervening. Not to “make the World a better place” for the majority of the people, but literally to kill the hopes of the masses. Even moderate efforts by politicians in office to let the “common man” or woman get a little bit more justice and a fairer part of what they work for are reason enough for the Empire (US) to remove them by media manipulation, bribery, instigating treason or civil war or simple murder. This book gives a voluminous account of most of the deeds coming from the land that calls itself “the Land of the Free”.

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Hope-Military-Interventions-Since/dp/1567510523

http://killinghope.org/ 

II) Naomi Klein, “The Shock Doctrine”

What the US Empire is really after, is well explained by Naomi Klein: they want to push the common people into a state of shock, being unable to realize what is done to them, dictate to their representatives the conditions and let them pay for their own suppression. The blueprint to this is coming from US techniques of individual manipulation of people by “stone age” psychiatric methods like electro shocks. The economic aims were formulated by Milton Friedman and his “Chicago Boys”.

http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/ 

III) C. Wright Mills, “The Power Elite”

Behind the pseudo democratic curtain there are the real decision makers, the Power Elite. Together with the economic power, now coming from a highly concentrated industry, the heads of the political and military sphere make up the Power Elite, in which the economic power has the greatest saying.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Power-Elite-Wright-Mills/dp/0195133544

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Book_Excerpts/PowerElite.html

http://www.csub.edu/~akebede/SOC502Mills2.pdf

 IV) Russ Baker, “Family of Secrets”

An insight into one of the “ruling” families and their activities allows this voluminous book, thoroughly researched. You might possibly be astonished to read that grandfather Bush (Prescott) was involved in getting the Nazis into power and to learn how “close” father Bush (“Poppy”) was to Kennedy´s assassination. Not only that he was around during the time of the Dallas shooting but his close friend de Mohrenschild had taken care of Lee Harvey Oswald (the “Patsy”) as a fatherly friend. The involvement of Poppy Bush into the events around Kennedy´s assassination is so scandalous that it´s hard to believe. You´ll also read how that son George W. who doesn´t hesitate to send his country´s sons and daughters into battle in order to kill thousands of other people and possibly die themselves was sneaking away when it came to his own military service!

http://www.amazon.com/Family-Secrets-Americas-Invisible-Government/dp/1608190064/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257379106&sr=8-6

http://www.familyofsecrets.com/

 V) Noam Chomsky, “Media Control”

If you want to know how all such frightening things could be hidden to the public, how crimes against Humanity, against human right and international law could be turned into the opposite in public eyes, then this book of the “Grand Seigneur” of political Analysis is very helpful.

http://www.amazon.com/Media-Control-Second-Edition-Achievements/dp/1583225366

It appears almost impossible to leave these books aside when trying to understand present day politics.

Andreas Schlüter

For a better understanding of today´s world and the “human condition” I recommend these Books and links:

Karl Marx:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/cw/volume35/index.htm

Reading Marx´s Capital with David Harvey:

http://davidharvey.org/

Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine

http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine

C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite:

http://www.amazon.com/Power-Elite-C-Wright-Mills/dp/0195133544#reader_0195133544

Russ Baker, Family of Secrets:

http://www.familyofsecrets.com/

William Blum, Killing Hope:

http://killinghope.org/

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Hope-Military-Interventions-Since/dp/1567510523

Daniele Ganser about “Nine Eleven”:

http://edvan.fadeout.ch/v2/?customerId=30&channelId=189&broadcastId=1379

+ https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/daniele-ganser-nine-eleven-reloaded/

When being tired oft the tuff stuff:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2011/06/29/some-music/

Andreas Schlüter

Without doubt there are people with obsessions concerning the death or otherwise fate of people converted into a hero media wise. The reasons for Tutankhamun or even of “Lady Di” deaths are of no up to little relevance for present day´s world. Very different is the case of Kennedy´s assassination. Why?

The sole Empire in the true sense left

After the end of WW II the USA was the only capitalist Empire left and – even if one would class the Soviet Union an (non capitalist) Empire – after the end of the Cold War it was and is definitely the only left Empire, irrespective of the fact that there are other powers emerging. If the US are not what it pretends to be, a true democracy, then that would be an alarming situation; and really worry, it is not or no more since long! And those forces which rule are not just the well known forces of simple wealth and more extended knowledge or even of simple and open brutality as common in history. The forces which have eroded the democracy and taken over power were already named by Kennedy and the president preceding him, Eisenhower. But listen to their words:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_II0H7X5O4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dctr_MoQ2cA&feature=related

Blue into orange!

Again and again we were dumped with the official theories on JFK´s assassination, the single shooter, officially being identified as Lee Harvey Oswald, shooting from the school book depository behind and obviously hitting JFK from the front! Even this simple fact of the shot coming from the front can be seen on the “Zapruder film” showing clearly the force coming from the front and pushing the president´s head back:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okroc9cs5cM&feature=related

And even many reports questioning the official theory are ignoring the clear evidence where from the shot really has come in favor of obscure dark spots on photos on the grassy hill where to even people tried to escape after the shooting. The shot came from the sewage system as it is excellently proven:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related

So, if obvious facts are distorted and blue turned into orange, for what purpose? And why are people working out the evidence of the shot from the front being ignored? Was or is there only a conspiracy to cover up the truth inside the US or was there a conspiracy to kill the president on the side of forces inside the US? If there was a conspiracy to cover the fact that a foreign conspiracy has led to the murder of the president, a conspiracy to prevent the incident to turn into a war, all reasons to keep it up are gone. The only reason to carry on with this masquerade can lie in the fact that the assassination was an “inside job”! The distortion of facts is the result of a conspiracy in order to cover up a US based conspiracy against the president. The people conspiring must necessary be located in high ranking levels, exactly in that strata warned of by JFK as well as Eisenhower. Also about those dark circles excellent research work has been done by Russ Baker (also reported here previously: http://tinyurl.com/7w88vjn). Involved is obviously the Bush clan, precisely “Poppy” Bush, George H. Bush, former CIA director and later President (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/). His son, George W. Bush, carried on with conspiracies, manipulating and lying. Those two presidencies were the two cases where the hidden forces had “their men” directly in office, with no hidden indirect strings necessary! But at last too many people saw the brutality of imperial greed openly personified in the son, George W. Bush. Another face, another type of personality was needed as the “face to represent” the pseudo democratic US Empire.

So which “Change”?

Since the murder of Kennedy the true power in the US is obvious to those who want to see. And since that US presidents know. It alarmed even “tricky Dick”, Richard Nixon, that there was a force deciding over the fate of a US President. His demands to get insight into the secret files on JFK´s assassination were simply ignored (see “Family of Secrets”, page 244 following). At least when got into office US presidents get aware of that sad truth pretty soon. But generally spoken the two established parties are deeply woven into the spider net of the true power of the super rich and their military industrial secret service complex. Obama might really have had some changes in mind when he struggled to become the “first black President” of the US. But even when he still had a clear majority he was hesitating to bring proclamations into existence. It is pretty clear that a real change could only be based on an alternative leftist movement forming into a political party potent enough, as those days Jesse Jackson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson) tried with his “rainbow coalition” unfortunately in vain.

No change without extended struggle and “sovereignty”

Before the background of the said it is clear that the ominous network behind the scene will not give up and already the treatment of the “occupy movement” with extended police brutality, the manipulations of the right to vote and the new legislation (http://tinyurl.com/c9qy8) show the fierce determination of the named forces. That does not mean that there couldn´t be different views and concept inside that network, it is surely not totally monolithic, but there are “red lines” concerning its power for which transgressions a US President will have to pay a high price. And there is reasonable fear that they might even unlash some sort of US fascism to defend their rule. The Nazis had a cynic view on “sovereignty”, stating “sovereign is who declares the state of emergency”, the new formulation would be “sovereign is who decides over the US President´s (and other President´s) death”! And sovereign is who decides who´s going to survive of the nation in “case of the worst”, but that´s another story.

Andreas Schlüter

Ungeachtet der Tatsache, dass manche Menschen zu mystischer Überhöhung von John F. Kennedy neigen, muss festgestellt werden, dass er wahrscheinlich der letzte US-Präsident war, der über ernsthaftes gesellschaftliches Verantwortungsgefühl und Gewissen verfügte. Er nahm nicht nur die Bürgerrechtsfrage deutlich ernster als seine Vorgänger, er stoppte auch das Hineinschlittern in die Atomkriegsgefahr, er weigerte sich, die „Heim-Terrorpläne“ seiner Stabschefs umzusetzen und kriegerisch in Kuba einzufallen (http://tinyurl.com/32cp3 ), und setzte damit den Aktionen des Militärisch-Industriellen Komplexes, vor dem bereits sein Vorgänger am Ende seiner Amtszeit gewarnt hatte, Grenzen. Es spricht viel dafür, dass dieser Komplex darauf mit der Ausschaltung des Präsidenten reagierte. Aus der Beantwortung der Frage, ob das passierte, ergibt sich die Frage nach der wahren Macht in den USA und was von ihr zu erwarten ist.

Absolut Erschreckendes hat der investigative Journalist Russ Baker (http://russbaker.com/) zu dieser Frage und zur Verbindung zwischen dem Bush-Klan und der Ermordung Kennedys in seinem Buch „Family of Secrets“ (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/) enthüllt, wie bereits vor einiger Zeit auf diesem Blog berichtet (http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl). Dabei spielt George H. Bush, ehemaliger CIA Direktor und ehemaliger US-Präsident (Spitzname „Poppy“) eine besonders finstere Rolle. Zu seinen Freunden gehörte George de Mohrenschild, russischer Emigrant, Geologe im Ölgeschäft und mutmaßlich CIA Agent.

Der tödliche Schuss und die Schützen

De Mohrenschild (http://tinyurl.com/yb82vwr) war „väterlicher“ Freund von Lee Harvey Oswald, dem „offiziellen“ Mörder Kennedys. Welche Rolle Oswald auch immer gespielt haben mag, ob durch de Mohrenschild als reiner „Sündenbock“ („I´m a patsy“) oder einer unter mehreren Schützen ins Szenario eingeführt, den tödlichen Schuss kann er aber nicht selbst abgegeben haben, wie dieser sehr überzeugende Filmbericht mit einem Beweis, woher der mysteriöse Todesschuss wirklich kam, belegt: http://tinyurl.com/6sykmc7. Auch auf weitere Schützen gibt es Hinweise (http://tinyurl.com/6w667sb). Ein Augenzeuge zu einem solchen weiteren Schützen kam unter sehr merkwürdigen Umständen zu Tode: http://tinyurl.com/7vuxwq2.

De Mohrenschild wurde später sehr gesprächig, was wohl zu seinem merkwürdigen „Selbstmord“ führte (http://tinyurl.com/d253daz), kurz bevor er noch einmal aussagen sollte. Übrigens war Russ Baker nicht der Erste, der über eine Verbindung von George H. Bush zur Ermordung Kennedys schrieb (http://tinyurl.com/3n9gcge).

Andreas Schlüter

Irrespective of the mystification of John F. Kennedy by a number of people it has to be said that most probably he was the last US President who felt a certain obligation to world peace though not being a „saint“ at all as to be seen on many occasions. He did not only take the civil rights question a little more serious than his predecessors, he stopped the sliding into atomic war danger, but he also stopped the “home terror plans” of his chiefs of staffs (http://tinyurl.com/32cp3), thus refusing to invade Cuba and thus setting borders to the “Military Industrial complex” of which his predecessor Eisenhower had already warned. There are many indications that that this complex reacted by putting that president “off”. The answer to the question whether they did so raises the question for the real power in the US and the question what is to be expected from it.

Frightening details in connection to this question and the connection of the Bush clan and the Kennedy murder were revealed in the book “Family of Secrets” (http://www.familyofsecrets.com/) by the investigative journalist Russ Baker (http://russbaker.com/) as been reported on this blog before (http://tinyurl.com/64gplzl, in German). Former director of the CIA and former US President George H. Bush (nick name “Poppy”) played a shocking role in this drama. Among his friends was George de Mohrenschild, Russian émigré, geologist in the oil field and CIA man.

The deadly shot and the shooters

De Mohrenschild (http://tinyurl.com/yb82vwr), was a „fatherly friend” to Lee Harvey Oswald, “official” murderer of Kennedy. Which role Oswald ever may have played, whether introduced and integrated into the game by de Mohrenschild as a simple toy for confusion („I´m a patsy“) or as one of the shooters, he can´t have fired the deadly shot as a film documentation convincingly reveals: http://tinyurl.com/6sykmc7. There are also very strong indications for more shooters again: http://tinyurl.com/6w667sb. An eye witness to such additional shooters died under very dubious circumstances: http://tinyurl.com/7vuxwq2. After all it appears that the deadly shot came from the sewage System: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czL1FGNWt1I&feature=related!

De Mohrenschild in course lateron became very talkative which may have lead to his strange “suicide” (http://tinyurl.com/d253daz) just before he was to be questioned again. By the way, Russ Baker was not the first to write about a connection of George H. Bush to the Kennedy assassination (http://tinyurl.com/3n9gcge).

Addition: strange enough a number of the included links are „no more working“!

Andreas Schlüter

More:

http://jfkmurdersolved.com/index1.htm

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/diary/dem.htm