Mit ‘military’ getaggte Beiträge

deutsche Version unten

Additional Comment: Climate Crisis and New Cold War

No doubt, no matter how much natural factors may be involved in climate warming, man-made factors are sitting on top of the dangerous process, driving it towards a tipping point. Objectively, both considerable restrictions in the consumption of fossil energy sources and thus reduction of certain productions are indispensable, as well as, in order to include the world as a whole in the „ecological healing process“, a far fairer distribution process, i.e. social-economic redistribution.

In particular, the waste of resources on the military, which is useless for humanity as a whole, contributes to the dangerous process. The U.S. military, for example, with its hundreds of military bases, is the largest single polluting factor for climate and ecology. In 2020, the U.S. spent nearly three times as much money on armaments as China and Russia combined.

As stated in the previous commentary, it is obviously the goal of the U.S. Power Elite to once again pull off the „act“ of deadly ruin by arms race that was so „successful“ against the then Eastern Bloc and brought it to its knees. Thus this strategy represents not only an enormous danger for the world peace as such, but likewise for the climatic situation of the world.

But it must also be noted that the unleashed neoliberal system of the West, masked as „flawless democracy,“ has far greater difficulties in mitigating the hardships that would necessarily result from the necessary massive restructuring of the economy through redistribution than is the case with the systems of China and Russia, which are repeatedly branded as „authoritarian“. However, these are also forced into superficial economic competition by U.S.-driven power poker (note: the point is not to idealize China and Russia as „perfect“).

The question is, whether a social and economic order, which is highly based on greed and profit interest, like our „Western world“, can be able to solve these problems in the interest of the majority of people. The answer can be only: NO!

It must be clear, who does not want to talk about the US-led war policy of the West and its imperial hegemony claim, should be silent about the climate catastrophe coming up to us! As long as this does not play a role at the climate conferences, the slogan can only be: together into the downfall!

Andreas Schlüter



deutsche Version

Zusatz-Kommentar: Klimakrise und neuer Kalter Krieg

Kein Zweifel, wie sehr auch natürliche Faktoren an der Klima-Erwärmung beteiligt sein mögen, die menschengemachten Faktoren setzen sich auf den gefährlichen Prozess auf, und treiben ihn auf einen Kipp-Punkt zu. Objektiv sind sowohl erhebliche Einschränkungen im Verbrauch an fossilen Energieträgern und damit letztlich bestimmter Produktionen unabdingbar, wie auch, um die Welt insgesamt in den „ökologischen Heilungsprozess“ einzubeziehen, ein weitaus fairerer Verteilungsprozess, also sozial-ökonomische Umverteilung.

Ganz besonders trägt dabei die für die Menschheit insgesamt nutzlose Vergeudung der Ressourcen für das Militär zu dem gefährlichen Prozess bei. So ist das US-Militär mit seinen hunderten von Militärbasen der größte einzelne Belastungsfaktor für Klima und Ökologie. 2020 haben die USA knapp dreimal soviel Geld für die Rüstung ausgegeben wie China und Russland zusammen.

Wie im vorigen Kommentar ausgeführt, ist es offensichtlich das Ziel der US-Machtelite, die „Nummer“ der Tot-Rüstung, die dem damaligen Ostblock gegenüber so „erfolgreich“ war und diesen in die Knie gezwungen hat, noch einmal durchzuziehen. Damit stellt diese Strategie nicht nur eine gewaltige Gefahr für den Weltfrieden als solchen dar, sondern ebenso für die Klimasituation der Welt.

Aber ebenso ist festzustellen, dass das als „lupenreine Demokratie“ maskierte entfesselte neoliberale System des Westens weit größere Schwierigkeiten hat, durch Umverteilung die Härten, sich notwendigerweise aus nötigem massiven Umbau der Wirtschaft ergeben würden, abzumildern, als dies bei den immer wieder als „autoritär“ gebrandmarkten Systemen Chinas und Russlands der Fall ist. Diese werden aber durch den US-getriebenen Machtpoker auch in oberflächlichen Wirtschaftswettlauf gezwungen (Anmerkung: es geht nicht darum, China und Russland als „perfekt“ zu idealisieren).

Die Frage ist, ob eine Gesellschaftsordnung, die hochgradig auf Gier und Profitinteresse beruht, wie eben doch unsere „Westliche Welt“, in der Lage sein kann, diese Probleme im Interesse der Mehrheits-Menschheit zu lösen. Die Antwort kann wohl doch nur lauten: NEIN!

Es muss klar sein, wer nicht über die US-geführte Kriegspolitik des Westens und deren imperialen Hegemonie-Anspruch reden will, kann von der auf uns zukommenden Klima-Katastrophe getrost schweigen! Solange dies keine Rolle bei den Klima-Konferenzen spielt, kann die Parole nur heißen: gemeinsam in den Untergang!

Andreas Schlüter



Smedley_Butler was a highly decorated US Marine Corps General whom US Capitalists tried to misuse for the attempted „Business_Plot“ which Butler revealed to the public:

This might have added to his will to confess what he had been used for throughout his military career and give a sound warning to mankind in his speeches which were transformed into the famous book „War_Is_a_Racket“ in 1934.

It´s important to read these great and enlightening lines, but for people with eye problems Butler´s words are performed by Graham Frye:

And here are the written words of Butler:

Unfortunately the writing in this link isn´t so well readable, therefore I transfered the text into this PDF file, since the text is obviously too long for WordPress, which is just crippling the text. But at present WordPress is always misplacing the pdf file. I hope it will work properly soon!

We should take the words of this man very serious! And especially US-Americans should! Not only on this day!


It might not be absurd to speculate that this book representing Butler´s mutation from a „Man of War“ to a „Man of Peace“ might have inspired Charlie_Chaplin for his great speech as the Barber and double of Fascist Dictator Hynkel in his film „The_Great_Dictator“:

Anyway, the clearness of Butlers words should make it clear to us that wars are a CONSPIRACY in favor of the rich and powerful, the Power Elite!

Andreas Schlüter

More on Smedley Butler:
On the „Business Plot“:
My articles on the USA:

Especially for those ones who´re still naively taking US politics to be a struggle for freedom and democracy I remind you here of two revealing presentations.

An Insider and Critic


The retired US General Wesley_Clark on how he was informed about the Pentagon´s plans to „take down“ the governments of „Seven Countries in five years“ pretty short after „Nine Eleven“:

His last words about the US and Africa are in fact showing some ignorance about the imperial activities (for example US AFRICOM) on that continent. But he´s in fact a serious critic of that imperialist policy. Anyway, the US are „lacking behind“ as far as the „time table“ is concerned!

An Imperial „Thinker“


The founder of Stratfor, George_Friedman, on US politics towards Middle East, Europe and Russia is presenting US designs for Europe´s future wars as a „prediction“:

Mind these words!

Andreas Schlüter


My articles on the USA:

My articles on Africa:



Let´s be frank, what is on the agenda for Africa on the side of the Western Power Elites is clearly to be seen. After the official end of colonialism only French troops were to be seen in Africa. Today by and large Western colonial troops or international troops directly or indirectly under Western control are back on the continent in numbers!  Likewise African puppets and their armed gangs are used to plunder and destabilize great parts of Africa, as for example happens with Congo where Kagame and Museveni after the Rwanda tragedy (1) let their troops loot and rape (2). The riches of Congo are exploited through slave labor organized by warlords, almost like Congo was plundered during Leopold´s “private” colonialism (3). Since Leopold II the Western activities have cost Congo between 15 and 20 millions of dead. Ethnic groups are armed by the West and played against each other like in the 19th century.

Direct Western military interventions have struck Ivory Coast, Libya and Mali. The new military race through Africa was started with the US Somalia adventure covered by “humanitarian” aims after a lot was done to destabilize the Horn of Africa. The US have their military colonial institution of US AFRICOM (4) located in Stuttgart (shame on Germany)! The aims of the decolonization time manifested in the formation of OAU (5) are forgotten respectively turned into their opposite (6).

But the war on Africa isn´t only waged by openly military means. A systematic crippling of all efforts to develop the continent by means of industrialization is to be found in the installation of the “free trade religion”. Every country boasting today of a highly developed industry has achieved that by means of protective customs. Africa has been barred of such measures and even its agriculture is more and more crippled by the forced imports of highly state supported agricultural imports from industrialized countries. The fishing grounds of West Africa as well as East Africa are swept empty by fishing fleets from the Northern Hemisphere. Fishermen can only survive either by transporting people fleeing the continent to Europe or by becoming Pirates!

All this could only have been “achieved” by eliminating or “neutralizing” the progressive personalities and movements who had a sound vision for true African independence, like Patrice Lumumba (7), Kwame Nkrumah (8)  Eduardo Mondlane (9), Samora Machel (10), Thomas Sankara (11) and last not least Muammar Gaddafi (12) as well as others. Many times compradors stepped in and installed western controlled puppet regimes. With the downfall of the East block all chances to maneuver against the Western economic and political power broke away. WTO (13) and IMF (14) are means of imperialism to keep Africa down. They forced extended privatization even of the most basic economic activities like water supply on many African societies.

Western media are part of that war. They permanently present a picture of “African barbarism” to blame the African societies for their miserable conditions. “50 years you´re independent but you´re not capable of managing your own affairs” are by and large their open or hidden slogans. Many times the West is trying to pull Africans to the international court where you´ll never see people like Clinton and Albright, mostly responsible for Rwanda´s and Congo´s tragedies (15) or Bush and Cheney with their terrorist wars! And sad, even a whole number of Africans fall into the trap of psychological manipulation – blaming the African continent itself for its miserable condition.

And many people try to escape from the Western produced hell, taking any chance to board on a boat that hardly meets any safety standards for the voyage over the open sea. Thousands got drowned already either on their trip from Senegal´s coast to the Canary Islands or from Tunisia, Libya or else to Italy, especially the small Island Lampedusa. If they prefer to go by land, to cross Sinai, they get into another hell for them, Israel (16). But Europe respectively the West – benefiting materially from the plunder of Africa – only accepts Africans (or refugees from Near East, as for that matter) if they arrive dead – then they´ll get a state burial (17). If you get there alive, you´ll be charged! All following the principle: only a dead refugee is a good refugee!

One might be astonished to hear these accusations from a (66 years old) “Child” of Germany, of Europe, of the West, but as much as I have unwillingly “enjoyed” the fruits of Western Imperialism,  having lived in a country with so much historical guilt, I have to stand up and shout: NOT IN MY NAME!

And I have to say one thing to my African friends: I can never advise how to free Africa, but one thing I´m sure of, Africa will never develop WITH the West, but only AGAINST the West, keep that in mind!

Andreas Schlüter

  1. this links doesn´t work anymore, see text below links















  16. /


  18. Text:

    The Hidden Story Behind Rwanda’s Tragedy

    By Christopher Black
  1. Editor’s Note: The Op-Ed is written by a Canadian attorney who represents a defendant before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Arusha, Tanzania, on war crimes charges. The attorney offers a counter-view to the one-sided representation of the Rwanda narrative. Readers are encouraged to submit their comments and reactions.
    Rwanda before 1990 was considered the Switzerland of Africa, a model of social development.
    The result of the 1959 social revolution that deposed the Tutsi monarchy and aristocracy and freed the majority Hutu population from serfdom and a lifetime of humiliation was the establishment of a collective society in which both Hutus, and Tutsis as well as Twas lived together in relative harmony.
    Tutsis were members of the government, its administration, present in large numbers in the education system, the judiciary and controlled most of the large private commercial companies in Rwanda.
    The Rwandan army was a multiethnic army composed of both Hutus and Tutsis and it stayed a multiethnic force even when the Rwandan Army was forced by the invaders from Uganda to retreat into the Congo forest in July 1994 because it ran out of ammunition due to the Western embargo on arms and supplies.
    Rwanda descended into chaos in 1990 when the self-described Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) forces launched a surprise attack on October 1, 1990 from Uganda. In fact, every one of the men and officers of that invasion force were members of the Ugandan national Army.
    It was an invasion by Uganda disguised as an independent force of “liberation”. Liberation from what, has never been stated.
    Initially the justification put out by the RPF was that of attaining the return of Tutsi “refugees” from Uganda to Rwanda. However, that problem had been resolved by an agreement between the RPF, Uganda, Rwanda, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the OAU a few weeks earlier. The Rwandan government had agreed to the return of all those Tutsis in Uganda who wanted to return to Rwanda.
    That accord required that Tutsi representatives of the refugees travel to Kigali for a meeting to determine the mechanics of that population movement, and how to accommodate all those people in a small country. They were expected at the end of September 1990. They never arrived.
    Instead of civilians returning in peace, Rwanda was viciously attacked on October 1, 1990 by a force that unleashed unbridled savagery. During that invasion the RPF forces of the Ugandan Army slaughtered everyone in their path, Hutu or Tutsi. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians, the majority Hutu, were butchered. These crimes have never been accounted for.
    The RPF’s favorite method was the bayonet or knife with which they disembowelled men and women or to tied their hands behind their backs and smashed their skulls with hoes, the farm tool iconic of the Hutu peasantry.
    After several weeks of intense fighting, the RPF forces were destroyed by the small Rwandan Army and the remnants fled, on US instructions, back into Uganda to regroup and reorganize.
    The RPF still never justified this aggression and the needless slaughter of civilians in a peaceful country. Individual Tutsis had always been allowed to return to Rwanda from the early 1960s and several times the Rwandan government invited them all to return. However the Tutsi aristocracy, jealous of its lost power and which viewed the Hutus as nothing but subhuman, refused to return unless their absolute power was restored. This the people of Rwanda, even the Tutsis who remained in the country, refused.
    In the 1960s and early 1970s various Tutsi groups in Uganda and elsewhere had organized terrorist raids into Rwanda in which they murdered without pity anyone they caught. These raids were repelled by Rwanda’s tiny armed forces. The years that followed were a period of development and peace for Rwandans. Even though one of the smallest and poorest countries in the world it had the best road system, healthcare, and education systems in Africa. Until the late 1980s it prospered and received help from both the socialist countries of the USSR, North Korea and China and West Germany, France and Israel and others.
    Some Tutsis in Uganda became involved in the civil wars there between the socialist Milton Obote and the US- and UK puppet Yoweri K. Museveni who was supported by the West to get rid of socialism in Uganda. By 1990 Tutsis composed a large section of the Ugandan Army and all the senior officers of the RPF were high officers in the Ugandan Army, the National Resistance Army. Paul Kagame himself was one of the highest-ranking officers in the intelligence services of the Ugandan army and was notorious for enjoying torturing prisoners.
    Rwanda until 1990 was a one party socialist state. The ruling party the National Movement For revolutionary Development (MRND) was not considered a party as such but rather a social movement in which everyone in society took part through local elections and the mechanism of consensus much like the system in Cuba.
    The fall of the Soviet Union led to pressure from the West, notably the United States and France to dismantle the one party state system and permit multiparty democracy.
    The President, Juvenal Habyarimana, instead of resisting, agreed to a change in the constitution and in 1991 Rwanda became a multiparty democracy. The fact the Rwandan government did this in the middle of a war is more than remarkable. It was also an offer of peace. The RPF, since its abject failure in 1990, had changed its strategy from a frontal assault to the tactics of terrorism.
    The RPF likes to refer to this phase as the guerrilla. However, it was not the guerrilla of a liberation struggle like the FLMN in Vietnam or the FARC in Colombia. It was instead a mirror image of the Contras campaign of terrorism conducted against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. Its purpose was not to make revolution. Its purpose was to overthrow the 1959 revolution. And, like the contras, the RPF was supported by the United States.
    This was clear from the beginning of the war.
    When the RPF launched their attack, President Juvenal Habyarimana was in Washington, lured out of the way, by the State Department. The evidence that the US was aware of and supported the October surprise attack was the US Administration’s offer to Habyarimana of asylum in the United States if he surrendered power to the RPF.
    Habyarimana refused and immediately flew back home. There was no condemnation of the Ugandan-RPF aggression by the United States, a matter which France raised at the United Nations, or any of its allies despite the big noise they made at the same time about the advance of Iraqi forces into Kuwait. Further, the Rwanda ambassador to the UN, then on the Security Council, filed a protest in the Security Council but the US had it taken off the agenda.
    In fact the US and its allies supported the aggression against Rwanda from the beginning and US Special Forces operated with the RPF from the beginning. Recently, while former president Bill Clinton was in Toronto, he denied any involvement in Rwanda–this is one of the big lies of the century. Clinton and George W. Bush are up to their necks in the blood of the Rwandan and Congolese people.
    With the arrival of multiparty democracy in 1991, the RPF took full advantage and created several front parties to take away support from the popular MRND. These parties though claiming to represent different political views in fact were, in the main front parties for the RPF.
    The press was expanded and many of the new papers were financed by and acted as mouthpieces for the RPF. At the same time as these parties sprang up, criticizing the government, the RPF continued its terror campaign: planting mines on roads that killed Hutu and Tutsi alike; assassinating politicians and officials; and, blaming it, with the help of various NGOs funded by western intelligence agencies, on the government.
    In 1992 a coalition government was formed with the RPF or its front parties seizing control of key ministries and appointing the prime minister. Through these agents they also controlled the civilian intelligence services that they then began to dismantle. The RPF engaged in a “talk and fight” strategy. Always agreeing to a ceasefire, pressing for more power, then launching new attacks on civilians. The most egregious was their breaking of the ceasefire and their major offensive in February 1993 in which they seized the major town of Ruhengeri in the process murdering 40,000 civilians most of them Hutu.
    The Rwandan Army, even though hamstrung by the civilian ministries that were controlled by the RPF, managed to drive the RPF back. Finally in August 1993 the Arusha Accords were signed under pressure from the United States and its allies in which the RPF obtained major concessions in return to the formation of a broad-based transition government to be followed by general elections.
    However, they knew they could not win such elections as the RPF was not only unpopular with the majority Hutu population it did not even enjoy the support of many internal Tutsis whose lives and businesses had been destroyed by the war they did not see a need for.
    Instead of preparing for elections the RPF prepared for their final offensive. As far back as December 1993, UN reports document the massive build-up of men and weapons coming in from Uganda. The UN force that was deployed supposedly to ensure a peaceful transition; in fact, it was a cover for the US and its allies to assist in this build up.
    General Roméo Dallaire, the Canadian general in charge of the UN force hid this build up from the Rwandan army and the President. The build-up was accompanied by death threats against the president.
    According to an account of Habyarimana’s last conversation with president Mobutu Sese Seko of what was then Zaire, just two days before he was murdered, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State for African Affairs Herman Cohen had, in October 1993, told Habyarimana, that unless he ceded all power to the RPF they were going to kill him and drag his body through the streets.
    These threats were punctuated by the murder of the first Hutu president of neighboring Burundi, Melchior Ndadaye, by Tutsi officers in October 1993 in which Kagame and the RPF also had a hand; the officers who committed the murder, including Lieutenant Paul Kamana, later fled to Uganda. Ndadaye was in office a mere four months, having won the country’s first free elections. In the aftermath of that murder 250,000 Hutus were massacred by the Tutsi army of Burundi and hundreds of thousands of Hutus fled to Rwanda.
    The result of the 1993 offensive was that one million Hutus fled the terror of the RPF in northern Rwanda towards the capital, Kigali, so that by April 1994 over a million refugees were encamped close to the capital and hundreds thousands more in camps in the south all fleeing RPF terror.
    The RPF did all it could in 1994 to paralyse the functioning of the government, to exacerbate racial tensions, and prepare for war.
    Then on April 6, 1994 they launched their final surprise attack by shooting down the presidential plane returning from a meeting in Tanzania that Uganda’s Museveni had arranged. In fact it is known that Museveni’s half-brother general Salim Saleh was at the final meeting at which the date for the shoot down was agreed.
    The missile attack killed Habyarimana, as well as Burundi’s new Hutu president Cyprien Ntayamire, and Rwanda’s military chief of staff, and others on board. This was the first massacre of 1994 and it was a massacre of Hutus by the RPF.
    The RPF then immediately launched attacks across Kigali and the north of the country. In the sector of Kigali known as Remera they killed everyone on the night of the 6th and the 7th, wiped out the Gendarme camp there, wiped out the military police camp at Kami and launched a major attack against Camp Kanombe, Camp Kigali and the main gendarme camp at Kacyriu.
    The Rwandan government and army called for a ceasefire the same night and next day. The RPF rejected the call. The Rwandan government asked for more UN help to control the situation. Instead, the US arranged that the main UN force be pulled out while flying in men and supplies to the RPF using C130 Hercules aircraft.
    The Rwandan Army, short of ammunition and unable to contain the RPF advances even offered an unconditional surrender on April 12th. The RPF rejected even this offer and instead shelled the Nyacyonga refugee camp where the one million Hutu refugees were located provoking their flight into the capital.
    The effect of one million people flooding into a small city that itself was under bombardment cannot be described. The RPF used this flood of people to infiltrate its men behind army lines. This created panic among the Hutu population that began killing anyone they did not recognize. It was clear that the RPF was not interested in saving lives, even Tutsis, but in seizing total power and did not want to negotiate at all.
    The late Dr. Alison Des Forges, the American who was considered a noted scholar on Rwanda, in her testimony in the Military II trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 2006 testified that the RPF claim that they attacked to stop a “genocide” was a myth; just propaganda to justify their attempt to seize power by force of arms.
    She also testified that the Rwandan government did not plan and execute genocide. This accords with the testimony of General Dallaire who also confirmed an earlier statement that there was no planned genocide by the government as did the deputy head of Belgian Army intelligence, Col. Vincent, who also testified at the ICTR that the idea of a genocide was a fantasy.
    The fighting in Kigali was intense. UN officers –confirming what has been said by Rwandan and RPF officers who have testified— state that the RPF was launching hundreds of Katyusha rockets every hour round the clock while the Rwandan Army ran out of hand grenades in the first few days and was reduced to fighting the RPF with hand made explosives.
    The vaunted RPF could not take Kigali. The siege of Kigali lasted three months and only ended when the Rwandan Army literally ran out of ammunition and ordered a general retreat into the Congo forest.
    RPF officers have stated that the RPF killed up to two million Hutus in those 12 weeks in a deliberate campaign to eliminate the Hutu population. The Akagera River, the length of which was under RPF control throughout, ran red with the blood of the Hutus massacred on its banks.
    The RPF claimed these were Tutsis but there were no Tutsis in that area and only the RPF had access to that area. Robert Gersony, of USAID in a report to the UNHCR in October 1994, filed as an exhibit at the ICTR, stated that the RFP carried out a systematic and planned massacre of the Hutu population. Please see
    As the Rwandan Army, including Tutsi officers within that army and men retreated into the Congo forest, the Hutu population, in fear for their lives fled with them in their millions. In local villages, Hutu neighbours attacked Tutsis in revenge for the murder of Hutus or fearing death at their hands. Tutsis also attacked Hutus. It was total war just as the RPF wished. The RPF later pursued the Hutus through the Congo forest between 1996 to 1998 and killed hundreds of thousands and possibly millions. They were shelled, machine gunned, raped, cut to pieces with knives. Accounts of that trek are difficult to bear.
    The RPF was assisted in its offensive by the United States. The UN Rwanda Emergency office in Nairobi was in fact manned by US Army officers and acted as the operational headquarters of the RPF and gave them intelligence on Rwandan Army movements and actions and directions.
    Prudence Bushnell the U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs telephoned the Rwandan Army chief of staff in May 1994 and told him that unless he surrendered he must know that he was fighting the United States of America and would be defeated. US Special Forces fought with the RPF. There is also evidence that Belgian forces of the UN were involved as an intercepted radio message from Kagame to his forces in the field refers to the help they had received from the Belgians.
    There is also evidence that Canadian forces were also involved and Atoine Nyetera a Tutsi prince, who was in Kigali in that period testified for the defense in the Military II trial and stated that not only were there no massacres committed against Tutsis by the Rwandan Army but that it was the RPF that began the massacres after they took Kigali and began killing Hutus.
    Nyetera testified that despite the claim by the RPF of being a Tutsi liberation group, when he saw their long columns enter the capital he saw that most of them were Sudanese, Eritreans, Ethiopians, Tanzanians and others speaking Swahili or Sudanese languages, in other words, mercenaries.
    Several RPF officers have testified at the ICTR and stated that they fled the Kagame regime as they had been promised that they fought for liberation of the Tutsis. However, when they wanted to take over the streets of Kigali to stop reprisals against Tutsis by Hutu civilians the junior officers were forbidden to do so, putting the lie to Kagame’s claim that he attacked to save Tutsis.
    These officers testified that Kagame wanted deaths to justify his war. The RPF could have controlled large parts of Kigali as they had at least 15,000 men in or near the capital opposed to 5,000 Rwandan Army forces. Instead Kagame used his men to ethnically cleanse the rest of the country of the Hutu population.
    The Rwanda War was a total war. All means were used to destroy that country and the Hutu people. The ultimate objective, the resources of the Congo. The US agreed to support the RPF in return for the RPF acting as a US proxy force to invade the Congo and seize its resources.
    The US now has several military bases in Rwanda and the country is nothing more than a US and UK colony run by thugs who keep control of the majority of the people by intimidation, murder and disinformation.
    None of this could have happened if those in the UN such as Kofi Anan, then in charge of the Department of peacekeeping operations, had done his job. None of this could have happened without the connivance of the NATO countries and Uganda, from where the invasion was launched.
    Ultimately, the prime responsibility rests with the United States of America and in particular the regimes of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and now President Barack Obama. As Boutros Boutros-Ghali, then UN Secretary General, stated to Canadian historian Robin Philpot in 2004: “The United States is one hundred percent responsible for what happened in Rwanda.”
    Toronto-based Christopher Black is a Barrister and International Criminal Lawyer. He is Lead Counsel, General Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Chief of Staff, Rwandan Gendarmerie. International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda (ICTR).