Mit ‘Nato’ getaggte Beiträge

It´s not a joke – or if, then a very dangerous one – but the US Power Elite sees the whole globe to be their colony. How far this goes shows a view on the way  the US_Mititary_High_Commands for the various regions of this World are organized:

us-military-commands

The Sun never sets in the US Empire!”

In fact the US High Command for the region in the center of the old Tri-Continent Asia, Europe, Africa, is called US CENTCOM, United_States_Central_Command. Under normal circumstances one would expect a big power – if so arrogant anyway to divide the World into sections for “colonial” military organization – to name the region of their own country as “CENTCOM”.

The explanation for this somehow strange naming is, that the US Power Elite has taken over – with some regional modification – the ideas of Sir Halford John Mackinder, a British Geographer and political analyst having formulated the „Heartland Theory”. Quote:

„Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World.“

http://www.indrastra.com/2016/06/PAPER-Heartland-Theory-of-Mackinder-Relevancy-in-Central-Asia-Geopolitics-002-06-2016-0043.html

Especially we in Europe should all know that it´s very dangerous to ally oneself too closely with a power following such dangerous concepts, since allies will be regarded as the forefront for militant expansion and thus are in the danger to become a battleground! This would be more dangerous with a probable US President named Hillary_Clinton!

Andreas Schlüter

Links:

Geo-Politics: The Core of Crisis and Chaos and the Nightmares of the US Power Elite“ https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/08/01/geo-politics-the-core-of-crisis-and-chaos-the-nightmares-of-the-us-power-elite/

US Politics: These Words Shouldn´t be Forgotten“: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/us-politics-these-words-shouldnt-be-forgotten/

The US Elections Ahead: What´s to be Expected From the US? A Recommendation“: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/10/15/the-us-elections-ahead-whats-to-be-expected-from-the-us-a-recommendation/

My articles on the USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/list-of-my-articles-on-the-usa/

 

Werbeanzeigen

Man möchte es kaum glauben, aber selbst in die Mainstream-Medien dringen nun (viel zu spät und viel zu wenig) die Befürchtungen zu Clintons wahrscheinlicher Präsidentschaft vor.

Augstein im Spiegel, „Was für Donald Trump spricht“ (unbesorgt, kein Enthusiasmus für den Mann, aber Objektivität im Vergleich):

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/was-fuer-donald-trump-spricht-kommentar-a-1117476.html

Gestern hat es mir fast die Sprache verschlagen, wozu „Das Erste“ in der Lage ist (diesmal im guten Sinne)! Warum nicht sonst so klar? Nun, wir wissen warum! Aber hier wird Klartext gesprochen:

monitor-clinton

http://www.ardmediathek.de/tv/Monitor/Falkin-im-Wei%C3%9Fen-Haus-Die-aggressive-Au/Das-Erste/Video?bcastId=438224&documentId=38448308

Hier kommt auch der gradlinige Prof. Günter Meyer zu Wort. Sieben Minuten, die sich lohnen!

Ein schönes Wochenende und besorgte Grüße an meine Leser

Andreas Schlüter

Links:

Im Monitorbericht angeführt, „Extending American Power“: https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNASReport-EAP-FINAL-1.pdf

Ausgezeichnete Analyse: http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/ausland/amerika/das-fuehrt-an-die-schwelle-des-dritten-weltkriegs/story/30530545

Nun bemerkt auch GMX Clintons finstere Seite: http://www.gmx.net/magazine/politik/wahlen/us-wahl/us-wahl-2016-dunkle-hillary-clinton-31972400

Meine Beiträge zu den USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/link-liste-meiner-artikel-zu-den-usa/

und besonders:

Video-Vortrag: “Der Einfluss der US-Machtelite auf die Internationale Politik”: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2015/06/07/der-einfluss-der-us-amerikanischen-machtelite-auf-die-internationale-politik/

Deutsche Version unten

With the warmongers in the US_Power_Elite many Germans are fed up with „Big Brothers“ dominabce over German politics. On the 8th of October an impressive demonstration was to be seen in Berlin. Photos down.

Raus aus der NATO – NATO raus!

Es wird Zeit, sich von der Dominanz des „Großen Bruders“ und der kriegslüsternen US-Machtelite zu verabschieden. Dies brachte die Demonstration in Berlin am 8. Oktober in Berlin zum Ausdruck! Ein paar Fotos unten.

Andreas Schlüter

nato-raus-raus-aus-nato

kooperatio-statt-konfrontation

alex-8-oktober

crowd-1

die-truppe

krieg-ist-nie-die-loesung

langer-marsch

zum-kanzleramt

mehr-waffen

Brandenburger Tor (to the left) US Embassy (to the right)

sahra

Sahra Wagenknecht

Germany: Large anti-NATO peace protest in Berlin

Deutschland soll Lebensmittelvorräte anlegen

Am Sonntag ist ein Konzept des Bundesamtes für Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe mit einen Aufruf zur Bevorratung bekannt geworden (http://tinyurl.com/h8b8aps). Tatsächlich soll dieses Konzept Ergebnis einer vierjährigen Ausarbeitung sein (http://tinyurl.com/hwfsdek). Allerdings gibt der vorgesehene Aufruf zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt Grund zu allerlei Bedenken und Spekulationen.

merkel-hamstern

eine verkappte „Mobilmachung“?

Tatsächlich enthält das Papier auch Verweise auf mögliche kriegerische Auseinandersetzungen.

Laut der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Sonntagszeitung „heißt es in dem 69 Seiten langen Konzept, „dass ein Angriff auf das Territorium Deutschlands, der eine konventionelle Landesverteidigung erfordert, unwahrscheinlich“ sei. Doch verlange die Sicherheitsvorsorge, „sich trotzdem auf eine solche, für die Zukunft nicht grundsätzlich auszuschließende existenzbedrohende Entwicklung angemessen vorzubereiten“.“

http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/f-a-s-exklusiv-so-will-die-bundesregierung-im-kriegsfall-reagieren-14398973.html

Angesichts der Tatsache, dass dieser Entwurf, der am 24. August beschlossen werden soll, kurze Zeit nach dem Weißbuch des Bundesverteidigungsministeriums (Das Weißbuch 2016 (PDF, 4,3 MB)) auf den Weg kommt, lässt doch erhebliche Befürchtungen zu. Zu willfährig hat sich bisher die Bundesregierung zumindest in Teilen den us-gesteuerten kriegstreiberischen Entwicklungen in der NATO gegenüber gezeigt (http://tinyurl.com/hjp3veu). Vor dieser Entwicklung kann man nicht genug warnen (http://tinyurl.com/jkubyec). Insofern lässt dieses Zusammentreffen nicht allzuviel Gutes ahnen. So sagt Oskar Lafontaine zu Recht auf Facebook:

Die Bevölkerung wird angehalten, einen individuellen Vorrat an Lebensmitteln von zehn Tagen vorzuhalten“, empfiehlt die Bundesregierung in ihrem Zivilschutzkonzept.

Die Wählerinnen und Wähler können nur erwidern: „Die Bundesregierung wird angehalten, ihren individuellen Vorrat an Hirn deutlich zu erhöhen.“

Ehe sie mit Schreckensszenarien die Bürgerinnen und Bürger verängstigt, sollte sie ihre Beteiligung an Ölkriegen beenden, ihre Waffenlieferungen an Kriegsparteien einstellen und dem „Säbelrasseln“ der USA an der russischen Grenze entgegentreten.“

oskar-vorratshaltung

Der Aspekt der Verantwortung

Nun gibt es aber auch weitere Aspekte. Natürlich ist diese Welt auch voller Gefahren, die nicht „selbstgemacht“ oder selbst mit befördert sind. Da gibt es die Naturkatastrophen einschließlich zunehmender Wetterextreme. Die digitale Vernetzung wird (in oft unverantwortlicher Weise) immer weiter ausgedehnt. Dieses schafft enorme Anfälligkeiten nicht nur kriminellen Machenschaften gegenüber (http://tinyurl.com/h3ed3m3). Ungeahnt heftige Sonnenstürme können große Teile der digitalen Welt zum Zusammenbruch führen. Gerade auch vor diesem Hintergrund sind die Versuche zur Abschaffung des Bargeldes mehr als wahnsinnig (http://tinyurl.com/pcko6ja). In diesem Zusammenhang ist es interessant, dass auch eine Bevorratung mit Bargeld angeregt wird. Ein digitaler Crash würde sehr viele Versorgungssysteme und große Teile der Infrastruktur lahmlegen wie natürlich auch jede Möglichkeit der bargeldlosen Bezahlung beenden.

Die Gefahren, die vom „Cyberwar“ ausgehen, werden durch aggressive Gedankenspiele zum Beispiel des Atlantic Council (http://tinyurl.com/zhhj73q ) natürlich auch nicht geringer, womit wir auch wieder beim Zitat von Oskar Lafontaine angelangt wären.

Jedenfalls ist grundsätzlich die Beschäftigung mit Fragen der „allgemeinen Daseinsvorsorge“ von großer Bedeutung. Gerade aber dieser Gesichtspunkt ist von unseren neoliberalen Bundesregierungen umfänglich und aufs sträflichste vernachlässigt worden. „Privat statt Staat“ war und ist nicht nur die Maxime der FDP. Und auch hier läuft es mit diesem Konzept genau wieder darauf hinaus! Wie sollen denn von HARTZ IV abhängige Familien diese Art der kostspieligen Bevorratung finanzieren? Natürlich werden die Lebensmittelbranche wie auch die Vertreiber von Haushaltswaren sich über diese Initiative außerordentlich freuen.

Eine Möglichkeit, zu schön, um wahr zu sein!

Was aber wäre, wenn der Bundesregierung ein Licht dazu aufgegangen wäre, von wo die derzeit größten Gefahren für dieses Land und Europa ausgehen? Eigentlich müsste die Regierung sich darüber klar sein.

Das Konzept sei „ keine Reaktion auf die jüngsten Attentate in Würzburg und Ansbach oder auf die derzeitige Flüchtlingssituation. Anlass sind vielmehr die Terroranschläge vom 11. September 2001 in den USA…“, wird geschrieben:

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/zivilschutzkonzept-buerger-sollen-nahrungsvorraete-fuer-den-ernstfall-anlegen-1.3129796

Schau an, die Bundesregierung besitzt wahrscheinlich genug Kenntnisse, um zu wissen, wer nun tatsächlich für die Anschläge vom 11. September 2001 verantwortlich war (http://tinyurl.com/ju3ao3a), und es müsste auch maßgeblichen Personen in der Regierung klar sein, dass insbesondere auch im Zusammenhang mit geopolitischen Fragen derzeit die „Schock-Strategie“ gegen Europa angewandt wird (http://tinyurl.com/gm9q2yv).

Ob diese Regierung aber die Erkenntnisse jetzt aber auch wagen würde, in Politik umzusetzen, kann füglichst bezweifelt werden. Also, dies wäre zu schön, um wahr zu sein!

Und nochmals, staatliche Vorsorge „für alle Fälle“ ist notwendige Verantwortung als „allgemeinen Daseinsvorsorge“, aber vernünftigerweise bedeutet dies „Staat statt Privat“. Und es bedeutet eine digitale Entflechtung der gesellschaftlichen Strukturen und Versorgungseinrichtungen sowie Schluss mit den Versuchen zur Verdrängung oder gar Abschaffung des Bargeldes.

Andreas Schlüter

https://www.bbk.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/BBK/DE/Publikationen/Publ_magazin/bsmag_1_16.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2016/08/21/bundesregierung-buerger-sollen-lebensmittel-und-bargeld-bunkern/

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article157781100/Bevoelkerung-soll-Lebensmittel-Vorraete-fuer-zehn-Tage-anlegen.html

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/sicherheitsdebatte-deutschland-macht-sich-angst-kommentar-a-1108872.html

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/zivilschutz-bund-will-fuer-alle-faelle-geruestet-sein-auf-fuer-angriff-a-1108777.html

Short Addition to the Post

Since the grip of the US Empire on the „Old World“  is dwindeling the Empire seems to be more determined than ever to get hold of the whole American Double Continent: „America to the Yankees!“ The „Roll Back“ of the leftist tendency in Latin America is on. Present main target: Venezuela!

Original Post

I´ve written a lot about the US Power Elite and their internal divisions (http://tinyurl.com/zv32w7m), though they might only count about 100 people today. It appears that finally the Neocon faction of the Power Elite has taken control, especially since they took over the Democratic Party (http://tinyurl.com/zy4t6er), clearly signaled by the spearhead of the Neocons in that party: Hillary Clinton!

Nightmare One:

The Southern Hemisphere – the „Non-White World“ – Getting Independent

The US Power Elite (predominantly WASP, White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) would be rightfully called the „Deep State“ of the USA (http://tinyurl.com/ho2nz87). And this Deep State has become more and more ruthless over the time. They have brought nightmares over the Southern Hemisphere by installing brutal dictatorships (http://tinyurl.com/kkpvcf7) in their interest and waging bloody colonial wars, in the last one and a half decades especially with their „War on Terror“ (http://tinyurl.com/nrxxej5). One of their aims is to prevent countries of Africa, Latin America, Near and Middle East and Southern Asia from choosing their trade partners freely and from making use of their resources and industrialize, since that would mean a division of resources and allowing them their part of „consuming ecologic Earth capacity“. To fight this the US Power Elite is even ready to resort to Bio warfare:

US Power Elite Declared Bio War on the Southern Hemisphere, East Asia

and all Non-Western Countries in September 2000”: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/03/13/us-power-elite-declared-war-on-the-southern-hemisphere-east-asia-and-all-non-western-countries-in-september-2000/

There is quite a number of people – among myself – who suspect that the „Deep State“ of the US could be behind some outbreaks of epidemics Africa (http://tinyurl.com/mwgjhoo) and Latin America (http://tinyurl.com/hfxvkq6). Furthermore it becomes more and more obvious that US „Intelligence“ was (and is) deeply involved in pushing fanatic Islamism (http://tinyurl.com/h7s3y7e) in order to counter the Socialist block (formerly) but more so to counter progressive Arab/Islamic nationalism that could develop their own regions full of resources (http://tinyurl.com/nu3zv9n). Unfortunately the US strategy seems to be relatively „successful“ in the desire to keep the South under control.

In fact the US lead Western policy has established a „Ring of Fire“ around Europe (http://tinyurl.com/gp48dhw) and European governments have been so stupid for a long time to lend a helping hand to „Big Brother“ in doing so. In fact this ring of fire stretches from Libya throughout Africa (http://tinyurl.com/le2hlpx) over Near and Middle East, the Balkans up to the Ukraine. Actually one gets the impression that the fire burns into Europe with Terror (http://tinyurl.com/zrwrk3k) adding also together with the refugee crisis to the financial problems threatening to blow even the EU up. Is the US having a hand also in this dramatic development? Absurd? Weakening their allies/vassals? We have to have a look at further geo-political challenges the US Power Elite is facing.

The Role of the European Union and the Changes in it

In the perception of many people at the core of the European Union´s history stands the French German relationship, and not without reason. Long Nazi-German occupation during WW II has humiliated France (and saw a lot of collaboration on the French side). The more it might astonish how relatively fast France and the Western part of Germany (Federal Republic of Germany) developed some sort of neighborly closeness and somehow friendship in post war times under De Gaulle and Adenauer.

Not only the war tired youth gave additional impulses but a strong part did the hysteria about the (not real) danger of a Soviet invasion and the cold war. France was soon stripped off his official colonial empire (as happened to the Germans with theirs after WW I) though keeping (a disastrous) dominance in many of its former colonies. The war torn countries saw a close cooperation (also with other smaller countries) in basic industrial fields as favorable (German: „Montan Union“). The members of this European Coal and Steel Community ‚ECSC‘ (“ the six“: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany) joined the EEC, the competing body  in Europe became the “European Free Trade Association” ( EFTA). As much as European powers (and the US) wanted the BRD to be enshrined in supranational structures France was resisting to be too much absorbed by such developments. Likewise France was member of NATO (French: OTAN) but did not integrate into the military structures and built its own “Force de frappe”.

The other side of the story is that the EU and its predecessors were also a means to keep the (West)-European allies/vassals under extended US control (http://tinyurl.com/zhocuew). And especially by the close French-German relationship the French with their desire for „independence“ as well as Germany could be better controlled being „bound together“ (not to forget that the German „Intelligence“ agencies were via old Nazis under full US control)

The EU has also become a means of US-lead Western expansion into East Europe and the former domain of the Soviet Union and later Russia, culminating in the Ukraine Crisis.

But there are changes in the US-European relationship. After World War II the roles were clear: the United States of America being the „Workbench of the World“ (http://tinyurl.com/pqp2mpp), creating more than half of World´s GDP, were the master, the war stricken West European countries the „clients“. With the vast de-industrialization of the US (and the UK) in the last decades and the turning to mostly finance-capitalist activities the European Union has become an enormous industrial power, quite ahead of the US. As problematic as the construction of the Euro is, it has become a dangerous competing currency for the Dollar.

And now we should look at the second nightmare of the US Power Elite, probably for them even much more frightening than the first one.

Nightmare Two, Most Troublesome:

The Iron Silk Road, the AIIB and the Eurasian Cooperation

China is actually supposed to bypass the US economically by 2018 (http://tinyurl.com/gr8z842), if one takes into consideration that many of the processes within the USA contributing to the GDP are somehow of „virtual“ nature, China´s real economic power might already be greater. Russia has to a certain extend recovered from the catastrophes linked to the collapse of the USSR. Both countries are in the BRICS „club“ (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). China and Russia are eager to strengthen the Eurasian economic cooperation. This is also manifested in the Iron Silk Road, the railway connection from China to West Europe, now only used for goods (http://tinyurl.com/hpz6cra). In connection to this and moreover important is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), which is also threatening to compete with the World bank. This is probably the greatest nightmare for the US Power Elite.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/11476533/Joining-Chinas-World-Bank-is-in-UKs-national-interest-depsite-Washington-anger.html

& http://www.businessinsider.com/hank-paulson-on-asian-infrastructure-investment-bank-2015-4?IR=T

& https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/13/white-house-pointedly-asks-uk-to-use-its-voice-as-part-of-chinese-led-bank

& http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/john-browne-chinese-bank-challenges-u-s-supremacy

& http://www.hangthebankers.com/united-states-facing-global-economic-isolation/

asian-infrastructure-investment-bank

A look at the map showing the countries participating in it makes the US anger and fear understandable. In fact European industrial capital could benefit a lot from such an intensified cooperation developing the center of the Eurasian double continent. It opens a very peaceful mutual cooperation. Now one must know that the US Power Elite has taken over – with some regional modification – the ideas of Sir Halford John Mackinder, a British Geographer and political analyst having formulated the „Heartland Theory”. Quote:

Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World.

http://www.indrastra.com/2016/06/PAPER-Heartland-Theory-of-Mackinder-Relevancy-in-Central-Asia-Geopolitics-002-06-2016-0043.html

How far this goes shows a view on the way the US Military High Commands for the various regions of this World are organized:

us-military-commands

In fact the US High Command for the region in the center of the old tri-continent Asia, Europe, Africa, is called US CENTCOM, Central US Military High Command, (http://tinyurl.com/jjowlkc). Under normal circumstances one would expect a big power – if so arrogant anyway to divide the World into sections for “colonial” military organization – to name the region of their own country as “CENTCOM”.

The concept of the Eurasian cooperation and the Iron Silk Road with the AIIB stands directly in opposition of the US Power Elite´s will to control the World by controlling the “Heartland”. Even the United Kingdom like many European countries is participating (http://tinyurl.com/zkk8746) in the AIIB. Also the old US ally Turkey has dared to join the Silk Road project and the AIIB. Could that have been a reason for a “US hand” in the coup attempt against Erdogan (http://tinyurl.com/gpp5fch)? And most of Europe, practically all of the EU involved in the Eurasian project, reason enough for US politics to take action?!

As one of the last attempts to get the EU “in line” is to be seen in the US efforts to get the EU into the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). As the US Ambassador with the EU has bluntly stated: “We need this deal to help solidify further the transatlantic alliance, to provide an economic equivalent to NATO “ (http://tinyurl.com/zoo9owg).

But resistance against TTIP and CETA (the Canadian-European equivalent) in Europe is growing rapidly, especially also in France. It looks as if it might (hopefully) not happen.

So, what if the US Power Elite has come to the conclusion: it´s time to blow up what we´ve built to control Europe better, since it has developed a dynamics which is now an obstacle to our world dominating strategy? A Europe pushed into complicated conflicts among the various states as well as within the respective societies might also be easier prevented from slipping into a Eurasian cooperation and they might always call „Big Brother“ to mediate in their quarrels. And also to this perspective fits the US strategy (in which stupid European governments have helped again and again) to create a „Ring of Fire“ around Europe from Libya through Africa and Near & Middle East to the Ukraine, moving millions of people (miserable poor victims of the warmongers) into Europe and creating enormous problems and conflicts between European states as well as within the European societies. As far as this aspect is concerned, this is my suspicion since quite some time.

So it might be that the “Deep State” of the US has come to the conclusion: what we can not control, we have to destroy! Thus the “European Project” might have died for the US.

And we have a „Neocon“ “crown witness” to this strategic concept, George Friedman, founder of Stratfor (retired from it 2015), presenting a speech at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeLu_yyz3tc

After all the „Deep State“ within the USA (http://tinyurl.com/ho2nz87) is famous for „False Flag attacks“, often perpetrated by Operation Gladio. A famous blueprint is Operation Northwoods, a project from the early 60ties for terror attacks on US targets outside and inside the US to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for a full scale invasion of the hated country. It was stopped by Kennedy, which he didn´t survive long (http://tinyurl.com/ndzt8ho). After all the most famous False Flag is the event which the Genius James Corbett presented in five Minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q

Maybe US politics takes a last measure to frighten especially France and Germany by Terror „to order“. That´s why one should think into „all directions“ when it comes to the tragic terror attacks and otherwise tragic or painful events hitting the two countries:

Staged „prevented“ Terror Attacks – Staged Terror?!“ https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/07/27/staged-prevented-terror-attacks-staged-terror/

Truly Europe has to be on alert!

Andreas Schlüter

My articles on the USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/list-of-my-articles-on-the-usa/

The fact that France and Germany share the same fate of being Terror stricken could be a reason to look at the relation between the two countries, which should be done here.

de-gaulle-and-adenauer

Coming (in case of Germany partly) from one mediaeval state, Charlemagne´s Empire, which was split after his son´s death, the relationship of the two countries saw many conflicts, which turned to be more complicated with the rise of Prussia which didn´t come from that common heritage.

The French Revolution was very ambivalent for the relation in as far as it raised democratic hopes in some German circles which were widely liquidated during French occupation of great parts of Germany by Napoleon. This again strengthened tendencies for German unity, which was finally the result of the Prussian led victory of German states against France in 1871, a triumph which left deep scares in France´s collective memory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93Germany_relations

Both World Wars left France against Germany victorious but only because of strong Anglo-Saxon support. Long Nazi-German occupation during WW II has humiliated France (and saw a lot of collaboration on the French side). The more it might astonish how relatively fast France and the Western part of Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) developed some sort of neighborly closeness and somehow friendship in post war times under De Gaulle and Adenauer. Not only the war tired youth gave additional impulses but a strong part did the hysteria about the (not real) danger of a Soviet invasion and the cold war. France was stripped off his official colonial empire (as happened to the Germans with theirs after WW I) though keeping (a disastrous) dominance in its former colonies. The war torn countries saw a close cooperation (also with other smaller countries) in basic industrial fields as favorable (German: „Montan Union“). The members of this European Coal and Steel Community ‚ECSC‘ (“ the six“: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany) joined the EEC, the competing body within Europe became the “European Free Trade Association” ( EFTA). As much as European powers wanted the BRD to be enshrined in supranational structures France was resisting to be too much absorbed by such developments. Likewise France was member of NATO (French: OTAN) but did not integrate into the military structures and built its own “Force de frappe”. .

France tried to keep close control especially of its former African colonies, to part of them (especially Togo) and their colonial henchmen German conservatives like Franz Josef had close links, at times combined with economic interests of Strauß´s entourage.

Germany and France had close military cooperation which was even directed at nuclear efforts (Strauß being Minister of Defense – 1956 to 1962 – was also very eager to get a nuclear option not purely based on the US, but were so in the end). By and large the German French relationship was complicated because of France being very skeptical about the US whereas Germany was depending on the US to a high degree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93United_States_relations

The end of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet bloc confronted France with the reunion of the two German states which was only tolerated (with pains as well by Thatcher´s GB but supported by the US) with the perspective of Germany being enshrined in a new European currency: the Euro (which GB didn´t join).

1990 to 1994 saw a very different approach of France and Germany to an African topic. France (surely out of own interest and a strategy still independent from the US) helped 1990 to rebuke the terrorist attack of Kagame/Museveni´s US backed invasion attempt into Rwanda, German polititians were on the opposite helpful in preparing and covering the second invasion of the terrorist RPF into Rwanda and the horror which followed for the DR Congo by Uganda´s and Kagame-Rwanda´s invasions (http://tinyurl.com/kkpvcf7).

In the US invasion of 2003 into Iraq based on lies France and Germany acted together trying to keep them out of that act against international law.

Things turned almost fundamentally with Sarkozy coming to office. Whereas Germany´s capital interests (still mostly based on production and the US turning more and more to finance capitalism) differed so much from the US that some reservation towards the US are to be detected France being obviously sceptical of Germany´s growing economic power turned more towards the US. France turned back to the integrated NATO Command.

When Libya was attacked by the US and NATO, Germany didn´t support the „No Fly Zone“ in the UN whereas France together with GB were in total support. After Hollande came to office the integration into the US imperial designs continued which is very obvious in case of Syria and Mali. Possibly Germany has been scared into a more supportive position by obvious „False Flag“ manifested in the Bag with the not exploding bomb found at Bonn Main Station (2012). This was the reminder to the German government by the US: „Boys and Girl, think of how nicely German Governments were behaving when they were still sitting in Bonn!“ (https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/usa-unser-groser-bruder-und-willst-du-nicht-mein-bruder-sein/).

It is obvious: the French German relationship can only be understood to the full extend in context of the triangle France-US-Germany and from the question whether French and German national interests contrasting to US interests had to manifest themselves. This played an important role also in the Ukrainian crisis coming from the aggressive expansion of NATO to the East.

The determination of France and Germany to join with Russia in the efforts to calm down the Ukraine conflict, resulted in the Minsk II agreement. The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine had met from 11th to 12th February 2015 – without the US being invited! After that was finalized the British Prime Minister Cameron was to be seen in front of a camera almost foaming from anger and indicating the Anglo-American fury about those efforts. In deed France and Germany had come to the conclusion that the Ukraine conflict wasn´t in Europe´s best interest (after having helped the US to start the mess). How important the Ukraine „game“ is, see the Neocon Think Tank man George Friedman on the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ablI1v9PXpI

Don´t mind the German subtitles!

So seeing the reactions of Cameron I made the prediction: „nasty things will come to France and Germany!“

Andreas Schlüter

Preface: open Words by the New York Times

On June 7th an article by Eric Lichtblau appeared in the New York Times (http://tinyurl.com/zj7onss) talking about uncountable incidents where „Terror attacks“ were staged to be just prevented in time, numbering such activities as two thirds of all such incidents:

In recent investigations from Florida to California, agents have helped people suspected of being extremists acquire weapons, scope out bombing targets and find the best routes to Syria to join the Islamic State, records show.“

They go even as far as to implicate mentally ill people (which one should bear in mind):

In Rochester, a paid informant went undercover and drove a man suspected of being an Islamic extremist, Emanuel Lutchman, to a Wal-Mart in December to buy a machete, ski masks, zip ties and other supplies for a would-be terrorist attack on New Year’s Eve. Because Mr. Lutchman, a mentally ill panhandler, had no money, the informant covered the $40 cost.“

Well, I´m not astonished about the facts as such but about the openness of the NYT! And the fact that it comes from NYT makes me believe that the percentage might even be much higher! After all the „Deep State“ within the USA (http://tinyurl.com/ho2nz87) is famous for „False Flag attacks“, often perpetrated by Operation Gladio. A famous blueprint is Operation Northwoods, a project for terror attacks on US targets outside and inside the US to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for a full scale invasion of the hated country. It was stopped by Kennedy, which he didn´t survive long (http://tinyurl.com/ndzt8ho). After all the most famous False Flag is the event which the Genius James Corbett presented in five Minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q

A Summer of Terror in France and Germany!

On the 14th of July this year the Nice attack took place, leaving 84 dead, 303 injured. The supposed perpetrator seems to be quite a very dubious „strange case“ (http://tinyurl.com/jqw6vlc). More so is the treatment of the evidence on this case, as Paul Craig Roberts states (http://tinyurl.com/hgcq237).

And then terror turned on Germany: on 18th of July the Wurzburg train attack took place. Inside a regional train a 17 year old Afghan unaccompanied child refugee attacked a family of four people from Hong Kong with a knife and a hatchet and injured them seriously. He jumped from the stopped train and injured another woman. When he tried to flee he was shot dead by Special Deployment Commandos mysteriously being nearby. One has to keep in mind that those forces are trained to stop people by shots without killing them.

Strange enough, witnesses describe the young man as friendly and relaxed (http://tinyurl.com/zhd46ts). Since a while he was living with a foster family. But it is said, an ISIS flag was “found” in his room, he should have “radicalized” himself unobserved within a short time. All very strange (http://tinyurl.com/j4mc7mt)!

Munich Attack

On Friday 22th of July the Munich shooting took place. The 18 years old Iranian-German with dual nationality Ali David Sonboli is said to have killed nine people (all not Germans by origin) and injured 35 people. He was living with his family, had serious psychic problems and is said to have been obsessed with Shooter games and Amok stories (like Breivik´s).

Strange enough it was first said that three shooters with long guns were on their way (afterwards it was reported that police in civil clothes with arms led to that observation). Another strange aspect is that first reports said, he was found dead, later on it was reported that he shot himself in front of police.

Reutlingen

Two days later, on Sunday, the 24th of July, the Reutlingen machete attack took place. A 21 years old Syrian Asylum seeker, known as violent and alcoholic, killed a pregnant woman with whom he had a relationship and wounded two other people. He was purposely knocked down by a car to stop him (which might have saved him whom being shot dead by police) and later on arrested by the police (http://tinyurl.com/jhpaw93, http://tinyurl.com/gt59zeo). Strange enough, on photos of the machete there´s no blood to be seen, as also Paul Craig Roberts states (http://tinyurl.com/hjpnntb).

Ansbach

The very same day in the evening the suicidal Ansbach bombing happened. In this case an ISIS connection seems apparent, according to released information, as much trustworthy as the information might be:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/25/germany-bomb-blast-what-we-know-so-far-ansbach-attack

It is released that he was in communication with an unknown person even short time before the bomb exploded.

Back to France: Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray church attack

Terror came back to France on the 26th July by the attack on a church in the Normandy during a mass. A priest and four hostages were taken, two of them nuns. The priest was killed, three hostages unharmed, one in a critical condition. The attackers were killed by police when leaving the church. Strange enough, one of the attackers was under police supervision (http://tinyurl.com/hxu3x4t), even wearing a supervision bracelet.

After all most of the perpetrators of all these attacks were very untypical as supposed Islamic extremists, most of them rather being either small gangsters or mentally disturbed or both. But on that later on.

I´d made a sad Prediction

I had to think again of a prediction I made after the efforts of France and Germany to join with Russia in the efforts to calm down the Ukraine conflict, resulting in the Minsk II agreement. The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine had met from 11th to 12th February 2015 – without the US being invited! After that was finalized the British Prime Minister Cameron was to be seen in front of a camera almost foaming from anger and indicating the Anglo-American fury about those efforts. In deed France and Germany had come to the conclusion that the Ukraine conflict wasn´t in Europe´s best interest (after having helped the US to start the mess). How important the Ukraine „game“ is, see the Neocon Think Tank man George Friedman on the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ablI1v9PXpI

Don´t mind the German subtitles!

So seeing this I made the prediction: „nasty things will come to France and Germany!“

aug-in-aug-mit-monster

A Strong Punishment or Just Accidents, Terror and Scandals?!

Already during the prelude of that agreement (which surely had started being negotiated quite some time before) Charlie Hebdo massacre happened on 7th January 2015, leaving 11 dead, 11 wounded.

On the 14th of February 2015 the French Ambassador in Denmark foolishly took part in a controversial event with the author of the Mohammed cartoons in Copenhagen and almost got into the line of the shooting that killed one person (http://tinyurl.com/ko37ny8).

On the 9th of March that year two helicopters crashed in Argentina leaving eight French nationals – among three Sport Stars – and the two Argentinean pilots dead (http://tinyurl.com/za76qqm). Officially the incident is blamed on a „pilot error“ (http://tinyurl.com/zzh7a85), but watching the video one can hardly imagine a pilot to be that stupid, a remote control intervention appears to me not absurd.

On the 24th March of 2015 another plane crash shocked Europe. Germanwings Flight 9525 crashed in the French Alps (http://tinyurl.com/mxyrs9v). The Co-Pilot was blamed for deliberately downing the plane in suicidal intent. One could have believed that if not very strange details would have been presented:

Criminal investigators said Lubitz’s web searches on his tablet computer in the days leading up to the crash included „ways to commit suicide“ and „cockpit doors and their security provisions“.

It might already appear strange that an averagely intelligent person would search on the Internet for methods of suicide, the more since he was said to have chosen the way which was before him almost every day. But ok, let´s accept that. Totally unbelievable is that he would have informed himself in the internet about cockpit doors and their security provisions since he´d find twenty times more on that in his handbooks! One must also know that in the US experiments on remote control takeover of passenger planes are going on since the sixties (http://tinyurl.com/ljb9vs5).

On 9th May 2015, an Airbus A400M Atlas cargo plane (http://tinyurl.com/jcgyw9q) crashed in Spain, leaving four crew members dead and two seriously wounded. After „technical problems“ with the black boxes the incident was blamed on software mistakes. One should bear in mind that Airbus is extremely loved by the US and Boeing!

On 21st of August an attack took place on a French high speed Thalys train (http://tinyurl.com/hxgoao8). Mysteriously three US soldiers were present to stop the Moroccan perpetrator: you see, only „Big Brother“ can help?!

On the 18th of September the Volkswagen Emission Scandal propped up (http://tinyurl.com/p65oxrz). All those car manufacturers might be rascals neglecting ecologic demands and cheating, but VW is a state owned German producer, a very painful affair (which I don´t want to defend at all).

On the 16th of October the rumors about the „bought“ World Championship in Germany came up (http://tinyurl.com/z27s93g). No doubt, Soccer has become a very dirty business and I have no intention to defend the „honorable“ organizers, but mind the time line!

The 13th of November 2015 saw the terrible Paris attacks (http://tinyurl.com/pb2bohv), in which 130 people died and 368 were injured, near to hundred seriously. All perpetrators who could clearly be identified were EU citizens. The attack was extremely professional and organized.

The year 2015 ended with the Cologne gang assault on women (http://tinyurl.com/golq9do), which in deed left many questions open, but created a lot of problems for the German government and it´s „Refugee Welcome“ policy.

But the New Year 2016 also saw grave events early: on the 7th of January there was a strange attack on a Paris police station (http://tinyurl.com/ztm8gkz). The perpetrator wore a fake explosive vest and didn´t stop when so told. A very strange way to „commit suicide“!

And not to forget, before the July events this year in June (http://tinyurl.com/gnmyz8b) there was the stabbing attack on a Paris police officer in front of his house and the murder of his wife.

Well, one could say, as much as the West, especially France, helping the US with Colonial wars (as by the way the British do without having a comparable number of attacks) the occurrence of such attacks are not miraculous. But most of the perpetrators – leaving alone the incidents not being associated with „Terror“ – do not fit into the picture of committed followers of Islam, rather, as already stated, mentally instable or small criminals or both.

But we shouldn´t forget the New York Times Article, and more important, there was (most probably better: is) not only Operation Gladio but also the notorious MKULTRA! And by the way, nobody is talking at present about the war danger by NATO expansionism, nobody is talking about TTIP and CETA either!

All this said respectively written, it should be natural to contemplate into ALL directions trying to analyze the terrible events!

Andreas Schlüter

My articles on the USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/list-of-my-articles-on-the-usa/

Eine kleine Vorrede

Im November 2006 bin ich damals in die Linkspartei/PDS eingetreten. Mit meiner Hamburger Herkunft hätte der Eintritt über die Linkspartei/WASG vielleicht nahegelegen, aber in Berlin zierte sich die Linkspartei/WASG der Vereinigung zur LINKEn gegenüber. Mit dieser Geschichte des Zusammenschlusses kann ich also praktisch sagen: ich bin also seit fast 10 Jahren Mitglied in DIE LINKE. Immer wieder hat mir besonders die opportunistische Tendenz meiner Berliner LINKEn zu schaffen gemacht, schon damals habe ich mich in der ersten Mitgliederversammlung meines Bezirks Tempelhof-Schöneberg beim Meinungsbild gegen die Fortsetzung der „Rot-Roten“ Koalition ausgesprochen.

Aber Berlin hin, Berlin her, die Bundes-LINKE war (und ist) für mich etwas Anderes und der gehört meine Solidarität. Dennoch, ich muss sagen, ich habe mir damals nicht vorstellen können, wie gewaltig ich mich innerparteilich würde ärgern können. Ich habe es allerdings in weniger als einem Jahr geschafft, meinem Berliner Landesvorsitzenden und dem Landesgeschäftsführer herzlich zuwider zu sein.

Genug mit der „Prahlerei“, und zum Ernst der Sache: ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich es schaffen werde, mein zehnjähriges Mitglieds-Jubiläum zu erreichen. Dennoch mache ich meinen Mund immer wieder auf, beziehungsweise greife in die Tastatur (http://tinyurl.com/hh24m9c).

Was lässt mich nun wieder zweifeln, ob ich es schaffen werde, dieses zehnjährige Jubiläum zu erreichen?

Bodo Ramelow: hat er den Schuss nicht gehört oder will er ihn nicht hören?

Seit geraumer Zeit müht sich die US-Machtelite nicht nur, einen Feuerring um Europa zu legen (wobei ihr europäische Regierungen immer wieder zur Hand gehen), http://tinyurl.com/ju3ao3a), sondern auch, einen neuen Kalten Krieg zügig voranzubringen:

Wahnsinn, Kriegstreiberei und Wirklichkeit: die „Methode Reagan“ lebt!“ https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/07/09/kriegstreiberei-und-wirklichkeit-die-methode-reagan-lebt/

Dabei spielt die NATO eine außerordentlich wichtige Rolle. Das Treiben nimmt immer tollere Formen an und es ist Eines klar: wenn der Wahnsinn weitergeht und diese Kräfte es schaffen, die Kriegsflamme anzufachen, dann wird Europa pulverisiert!

Die Soziale Frage ist für die LINKE zentral (oder sollte es zumindest sein), aber ohne Frieden keine Lösung der Sozialen Frage! Die Bedeutung der LINKEn liegt darin, Systemalternative zu sein, sozialökonomisch und friedenspolitisch. Sie hat auch ein Parteiprogramm:

https://www.die-linke.de/partei/dokumente/programm-der-partei-die-linke/iv6-wie-schaffen-wir-frieden-abruestung-kollektive-sicherheit-und-gemeinsame-entwicklung/frieden-in-solidaritaet-statt-kriege/

Hieraus ergibt sich, dass DIE LINKE sich für die Auflösung der NATO einsetzt, zuförderst für den Austritt Deutschlands aus den NATO-Strukturen. Es folgt daraus auch, sich vehement gegen Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr zu stellen, was DIE LINKE auch im Bundestag tut:

http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/086/1808656.pdf

ramelow

Einen (nicht den einzigen) aber schert das nicht: den „Genossen“ Bodo Ramelow, Ministerpräsident Thüringens. Denn er wittert „Morgenluft“, da könnte doch ein Amt als Bundesminister winken?

Ich rate meiner Partei, an der Nato-Frage diese Koalitionsmöglichkeit nicht unmöglich zu machen„, meint Bodo Ramelow.

http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2016-07/bodo-ramelow-rot-rot-gruen-sahra-wagenknecht-thueringen-nato

Und munter schwadroniert er:

Wir sollten unser Verhältnis zur Bundeswehr klären. Unaufgeregt, ruhig und sachlich. Für mich ist die Bundeswehr als Verteidigungsarmee nötig, für mich sind die Standorte der Bundeswehr in Thüringen wichtig. Und ich finde es nicht in Ordnung, dass die Bundeswehr schlechte Gewehre, schlechte Schiffe und schlechte Hubschrauber hat, aber als Landesverteidigungs- und nicht als Interventionsarmee.“

http://www.rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/bodo-ramelow-pazifismus-ist-nichts-fuer-deutschland-aid-1.5138927

Hat der Mann denn nicht gemerkt, dass die Bundeswehr in der NATO längst zur Interventionsarmee geworden ist? So dumm kann er nicht sein, aber Regierungsbeteiligung ist offenbar wichtiger! Daher:

an der Nato-Frage diese Koalitionsmöglichkeit nicht unmöglich zu machen

http://web.de/magazine/politik/ramelow-linke-rot-rot-gruen-bund-bewegen-31676066

Wie weiland die SPD?

Der „Genosse“ Ramelow möchte fraglos die „Sozialdemokratisierung“ der LINKEn vorantreiben, er würde damit vielleicht sogar in die Geschichte eintreten können, wenn man eines Tages vielleicht auf den Trümmern Europas überlegt, wer „mitgewirkt“ hat: http://www.geschichtsseiten.de/htm/urkatast.htm

Da hat vielleicht sogar der Kretschmann (ehemals Mitglied des Kommunistischen Bundes Westdeutschland) in seinem im Dezember 2014 dem „Tagesspiegel“ gegenüber abgegebenen Urteil zu Ramelow Recht, wenn wir von der frechen Anmaßung des Olivgrünen hinsichtlich der Bundes-LINKEn mal absehen:

Bei den Bundes-Grünen setzen manche immer noch auf Rot-Rot-Grün nach 2017. Kann man mit den Linken eine Wirtschaftsnation wie Deutschland regieren?

Die Linke ist bundespolitisch derzeit mit Sicherheit nicht regierungsfähig. Sie tut so, als lebten wir noch in einer Nationalökonomie. Wir leben aber in einer globalisierten Welt. Ich halte eine rot-rot-grüne Koalition nach der Bundestagswahl 2017 derzeit für vollkommen ausgeschlossen, auch und vor allem wegen der Außenpolitik. Die Linke hat sich doch mit ihrer prorussischen Position in der Ukraine-Krise in einem Ausmaß desavouiert, das ich nicht für möglich gehalten hätte.

Verbindet Sie nichts mit einem Pragmatiker wie Bodo Ramelow, der als erster linker Ministerpräsident Thüringen regiert?

Die Grünen vertreten eine eigenständige, neue Idee in der Politik, das ist die Nachhaltigkeit. Die Linke ist nur eine radikalisierte Form der Sozialdemokratie, an ihr ist nichts originell, aber auch gar nichts. Der Kollege Ramelow scheint mir eher ein biederer Sozialdemokrat zu sein. Im Kreise der Ministerpräsidenten werden wir sicher vernünftig zusammenarbeiten. Da geht es darum, die Landesbelange zu formulieren und sich im Bund Gehör zu verschaffen.

http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/winfried-kretschmann-die-linke-ist-im-bund-nicht-regierungsfaehig/11162070.html

Nun, Kretschmanns Nörgelei an der „prorussischen“ Position der LINKEn könnte vielleicht Ramelows Ohr erreichen und sein „Herz erweichen“, da ginge doch auch noch was! Vielleicht nochmal ein paar flotte Sprüche dazu?

Aber erstmal reichen die freundlichen Worte „zur Truppe“ ja schon mal. Da „scherzt“ man auf einer der LINKEn nicht ganz ohne Grund nicht so freundlich gesonnenen Seite:

Der Ramelow ist ein bisschen schwanger“, http://duckhome.net/tb/archives/14177-Der-Ramelow-ist-ein-bisschen-schwanger.html_1468221737

Ich erwarte allerdings von der LINKEn, den thüringischen Schwadroneur zur „linken Ordnung“ zu rufen und ihn ans Parteiprogramm zu erinnern, auch, wenn Thüringen ein ganz „besonderes Biotop“ ist!

Andreas Schlüter

Wichtigtuerisch kommt das Mainstream-mediale Geschwätz von der russischen Gefahr daher. So albern und läppisch wie es ist, ist es doch hochgefährlich, weil es die Öffentlichkeit gegenüber den wirklich gefährlichen Leuten einlullt. Die sitzen nämlich in den USA und den Hauptstädten der Vasallenstaaten der USA!

Zur Erinnerung:

genscher-und-baker

Genscher und Baker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXcWVTpQF3k

&

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6_Yf2JC80I

So waren die Zusicherungen an die damalige Sowjetunion klar: keine Osterweiterung der NATO! Nun, „es gilt das gebrochene Wort“! Aber der böse Agressor ist Putin. Die Methoden werden immer dreister, aber es ist im Prinzip – gerade gegenüber der westlichen Öffentlichkeit – „die Methode Reagan“, nämlich die der schamlosen Täuschung, man könnte such sagen, Verschwörung:

Die Methode Reagan“: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3Own6aOOI8

ronald-reagan

Aber stellvertretend für das mediale Nachplappern der US-Täuchungen hier „Meldungen“ meines Mailanbieters „GMX“:

gmx-kriegsrethorik-7-juli

http://www.gmx.net/magazine/politik/nato-gipfel-zeichen-internationales-militaerbuendnis-schoepft-krisen-kraft-31674860

Das „Spiel mit dem Feuer“ entlarvt sich auch in dieser Rede von George Friedman (Gründer von „Stratfor“):

Es sollte uns Eines klar sein: wenn dieser Wahnsinn weitergeht und es die US-Machtelite schaffen sollte, das Kriegsfeuer zu entfachen, dann wird Europa pulverisiert werden! Also, den Austritt aus den NATO-Strukturen fordern, sowie die US-Militärbasen aus dem Lande zu verweisen. Macht den Abgeordneten Dampf, und, massenweise auf die Straße!

Andreas Schlüter

Weitere Links:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/07/08/was-ist-los-mit-den-usa-die-fortsetzung-der-us-geschichte/

Von Nine Eleven zur Sprengung Europas?” https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2015/09/30/von-nine-eleven-zur-sprengung-europas/

Meine Beiträge zu den USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/link-liste-meiner-artikel-zu-den-usa/

ausdehnung-der-kontrollzone-pic

Zur Veranstaltung von Africavenir am 8. Juni 2016

Dialogforum: Ausdehnung der Kontrollzone: zur aktuellen Entwicklung des EU-Grenzregimes zwischen Afrika und Europa

http://www.africavenir.org/fr/details-evenement/cal/event/detail/2016/06/08/dialogforum_ausdehnung_der_kontrollzone_zur_aktuellen_entwicklung_des_eu_grenzregimes_zwischen_afr/view-list%7Cpage_id-1.html

colonial-attack

Africa under Attack!“

ist die treffende Aussage zur derzeitigen Situation, und nicht nur in Afrika. Unter der Führung der US-Machtelite ist ein Feuerring um Europa gelegt worden, von Libyen quer durch Afrika, den Nahen und Mittleren Osten bis in die Ukraine. Und schlimm, genug, viele europäische Regierungen haben dem „Großen Bruder“ dabei mitgeholfen. Nun wollen sie sich vor den Folgen des Zerstörungswerkes, nämlich dem Flüchtlingsstrom abschirmen:

https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2015/04/19/unmenschlichkeit-und-heuchelei-zum-fluchtlingsdrama-es-ist-unertraglich/

Was wird noch kommen? Hillary Clinton wird womöglich die nächste US-Präsidentin. Clinton ist aber tatsächlich die Speerspitze der Neocons in der Demokratischen Partei und die Neocons werden alles daran setzen, sie zur Präsidentin zu machen. Clinton hat die Neocon Victoria Nuland („fuck the EU“, eingestandenermaßen hat die den Maidan durch 5 Milliarden Dollar mitinszeniert) in die Administration gebracht. Deren Mann Robert Kagan, der Clinton unterstützt, ist Mitbegründer des „Project for the New American Century“. Um die „Visionen“ der dort versammelten Neocons zu begreifen, sollte man das Papier „Rebuilding America´s Defenses“ aus dem September 2000 sehr genau studieren (Autor u. a. Paul Wolfowitz). Dort findet sich auf S. 60 eine besonders bedrohliche Passage zu möglichen Konzepten der US-Politik in Afrika (und Asien):

And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.“

https://de.scribd.com/doc/9651/Rebuilding-Americas-Defenses-PNAC

Übersetzt heißt das: „Und fortgeschrittene Formen der biologischen Kriegsführung, die auf bestimmte Gentypen „zielen“ könnten die biologische Kriegsführung aus dem Reich des Terrors zu einem nützlichen politischen Instrument wandeln.

Hier geht es sicher nicht um den Genotypus des weißen Angelsachsen, sondern Afrika, Lateinamerika und Asien sind im Visier! Es handelt sich jedenfalls um die direkte Fortsetzung der Träume von der „schwarzen Bombe“ im „Project Coast“ des damaligen Apartheid-Regimes, um „biologischen Rassenkrieg“!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/110947.stm & http://tinyurl.com/bq34prg

& https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/ebola-pandoras-box-opened-since-long/

Tatsächlich knüpfen diese diabolischen Konzepte auch an das Kissinger-Papier NSSM 200 aus dem Jahre 1973 an, das sich intensiv mit dem Interesse der USA an einer Bevölkerungsreduktion in den Rohstoffregionen der südlichen Hemisphäre beschäftigt:

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve14p1/d118

Und so ist es zwar sehr erschreckend, aber nicht verwunderlich, dass der bedeutende Biochemiker Charles Arntzen, der auch eine wichtige Rolle in der „Ebola-Bekämpfung“ spielt, auf einem Kongress die Frage eines Kollegen, ob angesichts der Überbevölkerung Welternährungsprogramme nicht kontraproduktiv seien, lachend und launig beantwortet: „dann geht und bastelt einen besseren Virus“:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsD7l9xENRQ

Andreas Schlüter