Mit ‘Hollande’ getaggte Beiträge

trillary

Deutsche Version unten

On the 24th of August 2015 Pat_Buchanan dropped the remarkable word in a talk show that the Syria intervention has „Tonkin_Gulf_written_all_over_it„. And very true so! The recent supposed chemical_attack_in_Syria bears all signs of a „false-flag_psyop„. One feels reminded of the hoax: „they took the babies out of incubators“!

It is absolutely absurd to believe that Assad – after the US administration indicating short time ago that they would „tolerate“ Assad to the distaste of Britain – would have perpetrated that chemical assault. But logic seems to be suspended with Western polititians. Now Trump has-launched_more_50_than_missiles against a Syrian air base.

„Trumpillary“ or Another Election Fraud

After all it is not new that presidential candidates announce different from what they do in office. Obama talked about getting away from nuclear armament, announced the closing down of Guantanamo etc.. Soon he was „put on track“ by the US Power Elite and its „Deep_State„, making people laugh about the Peace Nobel Price. Trump announced „Détente“ with Russia and getting away from „Regime Change Wars“ for which many people rightfully preferred him to Killary. His actions are now directed to the opposite including the danger to get nearer to WW III.

Is it his struggle_for_personal_survival? Could he really be so stupid not to see that this was a False Flag? Then he´s more naive than people had reasons to believe. But let´s be very clear, this all is against international law, war crimes! The only foreign state operating in Syria on basis of international law is Russia, since invited by the sovereign Syrian State to do so!

Anyway, Clinton hailed air strikes against Syria hours_before_-trump_ordered_missile_strikes, bragging that this hadn´t been done before. Interestingly she remarked: „People have to know that they will be held accountable as war criminals as committing crimes against humanity if they engage in these kinds of oppressive, violent acts.“ Well, she should be in prison anyway! So, no reason to regret that she isn´t in office instead of Trump!

What has to be learned from it: as long as the US system isn´t radically changed by a broad social and political true leftist upheaval it hardly makes any difference who´s pendling on the US Neocon Power Elite´s strings.

Not astaundingly the European vassals like Merkel support the US madness. Seems they don´t understand that this will strengthen ISIS & al. In Syria, it will make the situation more unstable and trigger the refugee stream. Shame on my government!

Andreas Schlüter

Links:

http://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-39521332

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/false-flag-ron-paul-says-syrian-chemical-attack-makes-no-sense

http://www.globalresearch.ca/false-flag-operation-against-syria-lessons-from-the-vietnam-war-and-the-gulf-of-tonkin-resolution/5349979

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/false-flag-ron-paul-says-syrian-chemical-attack-makes-no-sense

My articles on the USA: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/list-of-my-articles-on-the-usa/

Deutsche Version

Gegen jede Logik haben die US-Regierung, ihre europäischen Vasallen und die Medien bezüglich der jüngsten (behaupteten?) Giftgasangriffe auf die Assad-Regierung gezeigt. Man fühlt sich an den „Vorfall“ im Golf von Tonkin erinnert, der der US-Regierung den Vorwand für die Bombardierung Nordvietnams lieferte.

Absurd ist dies alles, da die US-Regierung signalisiert hatte, sie würde auch ein Im-Amt-Bleiben Assads tolerieren. Welchen Grund könnte Assad haben, diese Haltung durch einben derartigen Angriff zunichtezumachen? Nein, die US-Machtelite mit ihren Neocons sowie die islamistischen Rebellen von ISIS und Al-Nusra sowie offenbar auch Erdogan wollten diese Entspannung nicht. Wenn es nicht überhaupt eine Inszenierung war, dann war es eine typische „False Flag Operation“, wie wohl schon früher einen Fall gab, den Seymour_Hersh aufgearbeitet hat.

Und nun hat Trump einen US-Angriff auf einen syrischen Luftwaffenstützpunkt mit über 50 Tomahwk Marschflugkörpern durchführen lassen.

Trumpillary oder ein weiterer Wahlbetrug

Tatsächlich ist es nicht neu, dass ein US-Präsidentschaftskandidat im Wahlkampf „Change“ ankündigt und im Amt nichts davon übrigbleibt. So wie es bei Obama war, der u. a. die Nuklearrüstung loswerden und Guantanamo schließen wollte. Bald stellte sich heraus, dass es nichts_mit_Change_ist. Trump hatte im Wahlkampf getönt, er wolle Entspannung mit Russland und den Weg der „Regime Change“ Kriege verlassen, wofür ihn nicht wenige Menschen mit guten Gründen Clinton vorzogen. Nun gehen seine Aktionen in die entgegengesetzte Richtung und bewegen sich gefährlich in Richtung auf einen Dritten Weltkrieg. Ist es sein eigener_Kampf ums Überleben? Oder ist er so dumm, dass er die „False Flag Operation“ nicht sieht? Dann wäre er so naiv, wie auch viele Menschen mit Grund es vermutet haben. Er hat nun massiv das Völkerrecht gebrochen. Das einzige Land außer Syrien, dass gemäß dem Völkerrecht in Syrien agiert, ist Russland, denn Russland tut dies auf Einladung der souveränen syrischen Regierung!

Nun, wenige Stunden vor den Luftschlägen forderte Clinton den US-Angriff auf Luftbasen Syriens, klagte gar, dass das längst hätte geschehen müssen. Sie erklärte auch, dass Kriegsverbrecher zur Verantwortung gezogen werden müssten. Da ist man geneigt zu sagen: „Hillary, pack schon mal Deine Zahnbürste ein!“ Sie hat sich immerhin gerühmt, Obama zur Zerstörung Libyens getrieben zu haben. Also, jedenfalls haben wir keinen Grund zu bedauern, das Clinton nicht statt Trump im Oval Office sitzt. Es ist klar, solange sich keine wirkliche soziale und politische linke Revolution in den USA ereignet, ist es weitgehend egal, wer als Präsident an den Fäden der Neocon US-Machtelite zappelt!

Natürlich haben die europäischen Vasallen der US-Machtelite schon größtes Verständnis für die US-Operation bekundet und frech Assad die Schuld an dem Gasangriff gegeben, allen voran Hollande und Merkel!

Offenbar sind diese Politiker nicht in der Lage zu begreifen, dass dies den IS und Consorten weiter stärkt, die Lage in Syrien weiter destabilisiert und neue Flüchtlingsströme erzeugen könnte. Schande über meine Regierung!

Andreas Schlüter

Links

Der Einfluss der US-Machtelite auf die Internationale Politik”: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2015/06/07/der-einfluss-der-us-amerikanischen-machtelite-auf-die-internationale-politik/

USA & Deutschland: https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2017/04/07/die-usa-bauen-ihre-rechte-und-privilegien-deutschland-aus/?nlid=56bafa4155

Advertisements

The fact that France and Germany share the same fate of being Terror stricken could be a reason to look at the relation between the two countries, which should be done here.

de-gaulle-and-adenauer

Coming (in case of Germany partly) from one mediaeval state, Charlemagne´s Empire, which was split after his son´s death, the relationship of the two countries saw many conflicts, which turned to be more complicated with the rise of Prussia which didn´t come from that common heritage.

The French Revolution was very ambivalent for the relation in as far as it raised democratic hopes in some German circles which were widely liquidated during French occupation of great parts of Germany by Napoleon. This again strengthened tendencies for German unity, which was finally the result of the Prussian led victory of German states against France in 1871, a triumph which left deep scares in France´s collective memory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93Germany_relations

Both World Wars left France against Germany victorious but only because of strong Anglo-Saxon support. Long Nazi-German occupation during WW II has humiliated France (and saw a lot of collaboration on the French side). The more it might astonish how relatively fast France and the Western part of Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) developed some sort of neighborly closeness and somehow friendship in post war times under De Gaulle and Adenauer. Not only the war tired youth gave additional impulses but a strong part did the hysteria about the (not real) danger of a Soviet invasion and the cold war. France was stripped off his official colonial empire (as happened to the Germans with theirs after WW I) though keeping (a disastrous) dominance in its former colonies. The war torn countries saw a close cooperation (also with other smaller countries) in basic industrial fields as favorable (German: „Montan Union“). The members of this European Coal and Steel Community ‚ECSC‘ (“ the six“: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany) joined the EEC, the competing body within Europe became the “European Free Trade Association” ( EFTA). As much as European powers wanted the BRD to be enshrined in supranational structures France was resisting to be too much absorbed by such developments. Likewise France was member of NATO (French: OTAN) but did not integrate into the military structures and built its own “Force de frappe”. .

France tried to keep close control especially of its former African colonies, to part of them (especially Togo) and their colonial henchmen German conservatives like Franz Josef had close links, at times combined with economic interests of Strauß´s entourage.

Germany and France had close military cooperation which was even directed at nuclear efforts (Strauß being Minister of Defense – 1956 to 1962 – was also very eager to get a nuclear option not purely based on the US, but were so in the end). By and large the German French relationship was complicated because of France being very skeptical about the US whereas Germany was depending on the US to a high degree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93United_States_relations

The end of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet bloc confronted France with the reunion of the two German states which was only tolerated (with pains as well by Thatcher´s GB but supported by the US) with the perspective of Germany being enshrined in a new European currency: the Euro (which GB didn´t join).

1990 to 1994 saw a very different approach of France and Germany to an African topic. France (surely out of own interest and a strategy still independent from the US) helped 1990 to rebuke the terrorist attack of Kagame/Museveni´s US backed invasion attempt into Rwanda, German polititians were on the opposite helpful in preparing and covering the second invasion of the terrorist RPF into Rwanda and the horror which followed for the DR Congo by Uganda´s and Kagame-Rwanda´s invasions (http://tinyurl.com/kkpvcf7).

In the US invasion of 2003 into Iraq based on lies France and Germany acted together trying to keep them out of that act against international law.

Things turned almost fundamentally with Sarkozy coming to office. Whereas Germany´s capital interests (still mostly based on production and the US turning more and more to finance capitalism) differed so much from the US that some reservation towards the US are to be detected France being obviously sceptical of Germany´s growing economic power turned more towards the US. France turned back to the integrated NATO Command.

When Libya was attacked by the US and NATO, Germany didn´t support the „No Fly Zone“ in the UN whereas France together with GB were in total support. After Hollande came to office the integration into the US imperial designs continued which is very obvious in case of Syria and Mali. Possibly Germany has been scared into a more supportive position by obvious „False Flag“ manifested in the Bag with the not exploding bomb found at Bonn Main Station (2012). This was the reminder to the German government by the US: „Boys and Girl, think of how nicely German Governments were behaving when they were still sitting in Bonn!“ (https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/usa-unser-groser-bruder-und-willst-du-nicht-mein-bruder-sein/).

It is obvious: the French German relationship can only be understood to the full extend in context of the triangle France-US-Germany and from the question whether French and German national interests contrasting to US interests had to manifest themselves. This played an important role also in the Ukrainian crisis coming from the aggressive expansion of NATO to the East.

The determination of France and Germany to join with Russia in the efforts to calm down the Ukraine conflict, resulted in the Minsk II agreement. The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine had met from 11th to 12th February 2015 – without the US being invited! After that was finalized the British Prime Minister Cameron was to be seen in front of a camera almost foaming from anger and indicating the Anglo-American fury about those efforts. In deed France and Germany had come to the conclusion that the Ukraine conflict wasn´t in Europe´s best interest (after having helped the US to start the mess). How important the Ukraine „game“ is, see the Neocon Think Tank man George Friedman on the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ablI1v9PXpI

Don´t mind the German subtitles!

So seeing the reactions of Cameron I made the prediction: „nasty things will come to France and Germany!“

Andreas Schlüter

Wanted

Veröffentlicht: Juni 14, 2013 in Politik
Schlagwörter:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

wanted-for-genocidal-wars-2

These people are responsible for millions of deads in Congo & Rwanda and/or for the continuation of the nightmare!

Either by perpetrating themselves or by supporting the perpetrators!

Diese Leute sind verantwortlich für Millionen Tote im Kongo und Ruanda und die Fortsetzung des Albtraums!

Entweder durch eigene Taten oder durch Unterstützung der Täter!

Still working on continuation of: