Mit ‘Gold’ getaggte Beiträge



Vor 20 Jahren kamen im Zuge der Eroberung Ruandas durch Kagame und seine RPF eine Million Menschen ums Leben. Dies war der Auftakt zur Zerstörung und Plünderung des Kongo, was acht bis zehn Millionen Kongolesen das Leben kostete. Im Hintergrund: die weltweite Destabilisierungs-Strategie der US-Machtelite!


Folge 1: (anklicken)

Folge 2: (anklicken)

Andreas Schlüter

Linksammlung zu Afrika und Nahost:

Meine Beiträge zu den USA:

Also a continuation of:

Crimes on Congo, Part 1, “From Destruction to Destroyed Independence”


On Monday 7th of April the commemorations on the „Genocide“ in Rwanda took place. Putting Genocide in quotation marks might give me the smell of a „denier“ of unspeakable human sufferings, but continuing to read this article with an open mind will drive that smell away.

Yes, twenty years ago something terrible happened in Rwanda and unspeakable crimes were perpetrated on hundred thousands of innocent people. But when people speak of the „Genocide“ in Rwanda they always mean genocide on the Tutsi! Yes, social divisions errupted into a monumental slaughter, not by itself but by an invasion and a terrorist shooting down of a plane! And additionally to 280,000 Tutsi victims there where about 750,000 Hutu victims to be mourned.



Like all continents Africa – the more as it is the cradle of Mankind – has its history of peoples migrations. Many regions saw a mixing but also superimpositions by very different ethnic entities and different economic systems, such is the case with the Central African Inter-Lake region, i. e. Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. The oldest identifiable ethnicity are the Twa, a group of short statured hunters and gatherers. Since more than 3,000 years Bantu speaking agriculturists immigrated into the region, by and large constituting the Hutu. During the 14th Century cattle nomads came, the Tutsi, establishing feudal empires (Nomads being used to competition over water and grazing grounds were always nearer to the art of war and thus dominated often when confronted with agriculturists). Like the Twa they adopted the language of the Hutu. In case of mixed marriages the children belonged to the fatherly group. Feudalism grew even more repressive under colonialism. The Germans supplemented the division between the tall and more sharp nosed Tutsi on one side and the Hutu on the other side by a racist concept ascribing „racial superiority“ to the Tutsi, a concept which was taken over by the Belgians. Though the division had become more and more a social one instead of a physical one the racist concept pleased the onliving claim for power of the Tutsi aristocracy.

Decolonization: End of the Monarchy, „One Man, One Vote“

Under German and Belgian colonial rule the two Tutsi kingdoms Rwanda and Burundi were administered together as Ruanda-Urundi. In 1956 Ruanda gained Autonomy. In 1961 rising tensions forced a referendum whether Monarchy should last. This resulted in Ruanda gaining independence as a Republic in 1962 which ended the dominance of the Tutsi (13%). The loss of power frustrated the Tutsi nobility and made many leave the country and moving to Uganda.

Similar tensions grew higher in Burundi resulting in a massacre in 1972 on the Hutu majority leaving about 250,000 of them dead. Coups and assassinations accompanied the further conflicts. 1993 a Hutu, Melchior Ndadaye, was elected President but murdered in October by Tutsi soldiers. He was followed by Cyprien Ntaryamira who was elected by the Parliament. Nobody has called the mass killing of Hutu in Burundi in 1972 a genocide!

In Rwanda the Minister of Defence, Juvénal Habyarimana, seized power from his cousin Grégoire Kayibanda in 1973. The country regained some stability.

The Invasion

But the Tutsi aristocracy was making plans to restore its rule in Rwanda. Many of them had joined the Ugandan armed forces. They formed the „Rwandese Patriotic Front“ (RPF) in 1987. Decicive in this development was Paul Kagame, member of the Tutsi aristocracy and head of the Ugandan Secret Service. His final „polishing“ he got in the USA in the Command and Staff College in Fort Leavenworth:

To be rightfully called a US agent ( he was part of a first attempt to invade and reestablish Tutsi reign in Rwanda by the RPF and Ugandan forces in 1990. Though leaving many people dead and spreading terror in the North of Rwanda and initiating streams of refugees they were thrown back by the Rwandan Forces (with French assistance, France wasn´t yet integrated in the US strategy and following its own interest). But a brutal guerilla warfare mostly against the rural Hutu people was continued by the RPF. The efforts to end the conflict resulted in the Arusha accords. There are tendencies to smear Habyarimana with having sabotaged it. The former German diplomat Helmut Strizek demonstrates in his book „Clinton am Kivu-See“ ( how baseless those accusations are.

The Beheading of two States

It was the RPF resorting to bloody violence again and starting another invasion. This step was accompanied by the shooting down of the plane with the Rwandan President Habyarimana and the Burundian President Ntaryamira on the 6th of April 1994. There is plenty of evidence that this was done by the RPF with support from the US and the Ugandan president Museweni as Strizek and others show. The war of aggression waged by the RPF did not only cost many Hutu lifes but provoked also violence against many Tutsi being suspected of collaborating with the invaders. No doubt that terrible crimes were also committed on innocent Tutsi. But there is evidence that agent provocateurs of the RPF were pushing those atrocities. One should imagine a fascist white organization trying to reestablish Apartheid in South Africa. Surely the masses would run wild from fear.

Who were the victims?

But the majority of the victims were not Tutsi. After all Strizek and others estimate the relation of Tutsi victims to Hutu victims of 280,000 to about 750,000 (Strizek 2011, p. 148). But the RPF had a „trick“: they counted who ever they could as Tutsi, where this wasn´t possible the victims were counted as „moderate Hutu“ slaughtered by „Hutu extremists“.


From Genocide to Genocide

With the victory of the RPF in Rwanda the slaughter didn´t end at all. Many more Hutu were butchered. Hundred thousands of them had fled to those day Zaïre (now Democratic Republic of the Congo ). Congo had a terrible history of colonial murders and plunder ( After having killed the visionary Lumumba they´d installed their puppet Mobutu Sese Seko who by the time run “out of order” and ruined the country so far that even the exploitation of its resources became difficult for the West. Portraying the refugees as a threat the RPF-Rwanda and Uganda invaded Zaire, the RPF installing Laurent-Désiré Kabila as the new head of Congo in 1997 in the socalled First Congo War. But Kabila remembered that he´s Congolese and demanded that foreign troups should leave the country and revised a number of agreements. Rwanda created a new rebel military movement called the Rassemblement Congolais pour la Democratie (RCD) to fight Kabila, Uganda formed a new rebel movement called the Movement for the Liberation of Congo (MLC), headed by the Congolese warlord Jean-Pierre Bemba thus starting the Second Congo War. Angolan, Zimbabwean and Namibian military supported the central government of Kabila. Hundreds of thousands Hutu refugees were butchered by Rwandese forces. But the bulk of the victims were Congolese. In 2001 Laurent Kabila was assassinated under strange circumstances ( His son Joseph Kabila followed him and brought in direct “international” involvement, the MONUC, now known as MONUSCO, African armies exept the Rwandan had left the country by June 2003. Direct Western presence was established. How far elections in 2006 and 2011 (wich left Kabila in office) can rightfully be called true elections is questionable. Questionable is also whether the conservatives estimations of the up to 5,400,000 victims are “sufficient”. According to the International Rescue Commitee only up to 2004 up to 3,900,000 people died in Congo ( It appears realistic to number the victims until today to the extend of those having died under King Leopold II of Belgium, 8 to 10 million! This is a true Genocide on the Congolese people organized by the Kagame regime and its US backers!

the-heart-of-africa 001 (2)

Colonialism in Congo is Back!

Much of the situation in Congo reminds of China before its revolution, since no one can talk of a souvereign country. There is no perspective and security for its inhabitants. Western countries and local neighbours (in this case mostly acting on behalf of the West) are plundering the rich resources (Coltan for computers, copper, Uranium, Diamonds and Gold). Rwanda´s Kagame regime is using “rebel organizations” like the March 23 Movement headed by warlords to organize slave labor for the extraction and channeling the riches through its own country, creating a pseudo boom at the price of the destruction of Africa´s heart, the Congo!

Another misuse of the Holocaust

Since long Western politicians are misusing the unbelievable German crimes as a legitimation for more crimes. Israel´s racist and colonialist occupation policy claims to prevent another Holocaust, with massive backing especially by the US. And that worked to a certain extend since even some leftist movements are befuddled by such claims. Those forces did a lot to split anti-racist, anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist movements. Western mainstream media run high in propaganda and “rewriting” History, reducing Orwell´s “1984” almost into a good night story.

Whenever anti-imperialist movements were talking about Fascism in Western actions those forces were denouncing them as relativating Nazism. But no problem for Western politicians to equate unloved personalities of opposing states to Hitler, covering their wars of aggression as some sort of repetition of the Second World War. In fact the Rwanda “Genocide” was the “Masterpiece” of the US Power Elite. They pushed the powerthirsty Tutsi aristocracy to a war of aggression, leading to about a million dead people, claimed it to be the attempted genocide on the Tutsi and declared Kagame and his military bandits of the RPF to be the saints saving the Tutsi within Rwanda (for whom in reality they didn´t care at all).

The next step was to declare the Tutsi the “Jews of Africa”, a comparison so far from historical reality that one would have to laugh if the case wouldn´t be that sad! Some French “Revisionists” even went so far as to dubb the Hutu forces trying to resist the RPF invasion to be part of a “Nazisme Tropical” (Jean-Pierre Chrètien in Libération on 26th April 1994). A ready made plan of the Habyarimana government to extinct the whole Tutsi population was constructed by Western ideologists. Germans might have felt strange relief, “we´re not the only ones”, Westerners in general were attracted by old colonial stereotypes: those African barbarians have to be saved from their savage emotions, the white man has to save Africa from itself! Also the onliving racist concepts of the “noble Tutsi” might have done their part, not to forget Hollywood productions like “Hotel Rwanda “. But many times the polititians found more tactful expressions, “the international community”, those clinging to “Western values” have to do the job (of savin Africa)! And the bourgeois concept about Fascism was revived, portraying Fascism not as a means of capitalist policy under pressure in order to disciplin the workers, but claiming it to be a tendency of the dump masses, envying the wealthy people and getting hysterical.

For those who wanted to see, it became soon clear, the Conglese resources were the aim. But having established the concept of the African Holocaust, the Tutsi turned into the Jews of Africa, thus turning Kagame´s RPF-Rwanda into Africa´s Israel, who would dare to contradict in the World´s diplomatic discussions?!

kagame-meets-genocidaire-no-oneEvery morning President Kagame meets the Genocidaire No One!

Mourning the Dead

Indeed mankind has to mourn about a million of dead people in Rwanda, many of them innocent Tutsi. But we shouldn´t allow political gangsters to misuse the innocent Tutsi victims to cover the majority of the the Hutu victims and also not allow them to be misused to cover 8 to 10 million dead Congolese! We should mourn the victims of the Congolese Genocide as well. And the evil doers are Clinton, Albright, Museveni and last not least Kagame and their RPF gangs!


Kagame and his entourage are the products of US Power Elite´s socalled “Soft Power Fraction” ( and their executive force, the Clinton administration of those days. He is clever enough to remeber Mobutu´s fate and to know that US agents are not safe forever. Having committed so many crimes which can not all be hidden forever from world public he´s preparing to build a “life boat” just building and strenghening ties also to the Neocons via AIPAC (

Andreas Schlüter


Charles Onana on the Shooting down of the plane:

Robin Philpot on Rwanda:

Rwanda, the untold story:

Interview Ann Garrison:

Burundi 1973:

Ruanda & Burundi, Dr. Helmut Strizek:

Burundi & Rwanda:,_2011

My Articles on Africa:

(deutsche Version demnächst)

Preface: from the cradle of mankind

Anthropologic contemplations on existing racism

Modern Homo Sapiens emerged in Africa about 200,000 years ago. More archaic men – surely no dumb idiots but so able as to reach the island Flores in today Indonesia already by naval techniques – had already spread to Asia and Europe long ago. Those long time emigrants also leaving tropical regions had a long time adaption to cold and less sunny climates by less pigmentation and other physical modifications. When modern Africans emigrated – we all are predominantly descending from them – already about 120,000 years ago on certain routes they got admixture by those groups. So little comes from that admixture anyway that all our mitochondrial heritage (Mitochondrial material with own genetic material only passed by the mother) and y-chromosomes (only passed from the father) all come from modern (African) Homo Sapiens. It seems that the groups as such (modern man and the archaic groups) didn´t mix but men always had the tendency to rape (most probably from both sides). But we can be sure that in connection to environmental conditions all people who have different looks from African people today look so partly due to that archaic admixture favored by colder climates in which they have lived for a longer times. Especially after the end of the last ice age those northern groups with archaic admixture could increase in number and pass by ways which were blocked before. The people passing from Africa via climatic zones comparable to their home continent maintained their physical appearance. Those people are still to be found from parts of India (mostly having admixture) to the Melanesian Islands in the South West Pacific (see links down).

North versus South

Contact and Conflict: The Northern Expansion

When climatic changes opened ways blocked before and also the betterment in northern regions favored population growth northern people expanded. Cultural contacts between groups having dealt with different problems lead to multiplications of concepts and intellectual growth. In the North African, Near and Middle East as well as East Asian contact zones this lead to the upcoming of so called high cultures with the development of writing. The original black groups had an important hand in it and it is not for nothing that obviously the first writing developed in Egypt which was those days basically an African society. But by the time the Northerners formed by cold and hard conditions became in their expansion more aggressive and especially in South East Asia many original black ethnicities retreated to typical rain wood regions, where today they make up tiny minorities. But a large number there as well as in West Asia and South East Europe were absorbed into the expanding Northerners, in which you can at times still see that admixture. Never the less from Eastern parts of Indonesia to Melanesia the original black population is clearly surfacing and makes up the majority.

“White Man´s Rule”, Slavery and Capitalism

When by virtue of history the Europeans got control over vast parts of the world and made people and resources instruments of their further economical development they built a racist hierarchy imposing their sick concept of “racial superiority” and by the side of North Europeans “racial purity” on the subjugated people. They also liked to rule by dividing and played one group of oppressed people against the other increasing racist tendencies also among the oppressed. They were successfully dividing the exploited people of the colonies among each other as well as the exploited workers of their own ethnicities. The worst type of degradation, the “mother of racism”, became the anti black racism which they were also partly imposing and partly strengthening among other colonized groups. So a terrible “color hierarchy” was established, hitting Africa, Latin America, Asia and Oceania.

From Colonialism to Neocolonialism

When the competition of the different imperialist powers had resulted in terrible wars (World Wars I & II) and a social alternative represented in the “Socialist block” (as deformed it may ever have been) grew stronger, and one capitalist power – the US – became the one Empire struggling for control over this world, the concept was changed from direct political control to neocolonialism using strangulated puppet regimes as their henchmen to carry on ruthless exploitation of men and nature. They (the ruling “1 %”) pretended also to divert from racism (since they had to mobilize the world against their fascist competitors on basis of Nazi racism) but indeed carried on with it also by exploiting their seeds in other parts of the world. And they developed a tricky way of proclaiming “human rights” and “democracy” to intervene and invade again in “gun boat” manner. They usurped even justified liberation movements and strangulated them like the South Sudanese Liberation movement to destroy it and get control over recourses, especially Oil. And a very practical way to work was the old colonial territorial organization which had lead to formations full of conflicts.

The Indonesian Regime, a Brutal Henchman of globalized Capitalism

When Indonesia (to that day “Dutch East India”) gained independence (declared August 1945, formally recognized December 1949 by the Dutch) under Ahmed Sukarno it tried to follow a path of independence in the group of the block free states. But the military was very strong and deeply linked to the West, especially the US. Sukarno who had tried to balance the military and the strong communist party failed in the end after a terrible conflict (500,000 people, many landless sympathizers of the KP, butchered). General Suharto was the man of the US and seized power over the archipelago with so many different ethnicities. He and his military clique turned the many islands into a plunder ground for the Westerners and Japanese interests using Javanese dominance for their purposes, especially to eastern regions, i. e. the western part of New Guinea.

New Africa or Old Africa: New Guinea

When the Spaniards and other Westerners came across the island, its dark skinned inhabitants with frizzy hair reminded them of Africa´s Guinea Coast (which was already made the hunting ground for slavers) which inspired them to name the island New Guinea. Going further east they met similar people up to the Fiji islands and in course of time named them Melanesians because of the dark pigmentation. East of Fiji they came across people who seem to be an old mixture of all three main fractions of mankind and soon started the racist splitting and installation of “race hierarchy”, actually degrading all groups. The Melanesians became object of rude anti black racism and many times subjected to slavery called forced labor. The Polynesians became an object of sexual racism and their women were looked at as white man´s sex objects without rights, paternalistic exoticism. In modern times after World War II the US did not hesitate to make one of those island groups (Bikini) their nuclear playing ground and even transported people back to the polluted island “testing” the results. Actually the Japanese “interplay” in the South West Pacific region during World War II did not provide any “non white” solidarity on the side of the Japanese also coming with racist arrogance.

Contrary to the hostile degradation of its inhabitants by white people and contrary to the relative isolation (being protected by its rain wood forests) New Guinea is a remarkable place concerning cultural history. Independently from the early development of agriculture in the “fertile half moon” (stretching from North East Africa over the South of Turkey to Mesopotamia) as well as independently from the agricultural development in South China the agricultural history with intensive gardening techniques in New Guinea dates back 7,000 to 10,000 years (, thus putting it´s inhabitants, the Papua, among the pioneers of mankind´s agricultural history.

On the other side has the natural surrounding with high mountains and deep valleys led to an enormous linguistic splitting and the number of languages outnumbers that of continents. Certain forms of conflict practices (though culturally limited in a refined way) as well as other cultural practices strengthened western prejudices. When the Dutch reigned over “Dutch East India” including the western part of New Guinea, they infected many of the other colonized, whereas the Muslims did not even “need” this infection. The eastern part of New Guinea was up to World War I divided between the Germans in the North East and the British in the South East. The German part was handed to the Australians as a “protectorate” afterwards. Both parts got independence as Papua New Guinea in 1975 including the “Bismarck Archipelago and the Northern Solomon Islands ( Rich resources (oil, copper, gold) as well as well as agricultural products (coffee, cocoa, oil palm and tea) inspire Western greed and expose the country to all well known evils of neocolonialism as the western part of the island does. All 7.5 to 8 million inhabitants of today will have to defend their place against this growing greed.


The Fake “Decision”, the “Act of Free Choice”

Indonesia gained independence soon after WW II but Western New Guinea remained under Dutch control to the distaste of the Indonesian ruling class. The issue of independence raised some complicated questions in general, which were even more felt in Africa. A basic contradiction was lying in decolonization with colonial borders which separated ethnicities and lumped others – having historical conflicts or having very different types of society – together. General line among the anti colonial movements was to avoid endless border issues. But on the other side in Africa the large entity of former French West Africa was also split into a number of countries. The aspirations of the Javanese dominated Indonesian political class (under pressure of overpopulation in the archipelago´s West) were confronted with a special situation. Firstly West New Guinea had been longer under Dutch control and was de facto already no more “part of Indonesia”, secondly, but more important, it was a very different world. It was not only inhabited by very different people but by people on whom especially the majority and decisive group, the Javanese looked upon in despise with that racist arrogance that was strengthened by North European anti black racism. And the social structure would have left them almost defenseless to economic and social exploitation.

Such considerations didn´t bother neither the Indonesian government nor the Dutch nor the white dominated UN and by no means the US government. Indonesia tried to solve their “problem” by military force and under the strong influence of the US the UN made Holland in the New York agreement complying to hand over administration to Indonesia (which they did in March 1963), for which the US had special plans, fittingly analyzed by Noam Chomsky in an interview (shown in a video on YouTube, link under this paragraph). But the treaty also included a procedure after a while in which the Papua should decide whether they wanted to stay with Indonesia. The “Act of Free Choice” was then in 1969 nothing but a typical colonial theatre. The Indonesia military had selected 1025 men to vote in an event in July to August 1969 about the future of their people, which was being performed by “hand rising” (surrounded by barbed wire and armed forces nearby), blocking any public discussion on the matter. It doesn´t need much fantasy to imagine which mixture of bribing and terrorizing a military organization has to apply reaching the wanted result ( & Nevertheless the UN manifested this fake procedure in the resolution 2504 (XXIV) without any qualification whether it fulfilled the demands described in United Nations General Assembly resolutions 1514 and 1541 (XV) respectively. To call this theatre play an act of „self determination“ requires a high grade of cynicism.

Chomsky on East Timor (part 1 & part 2):

 Ongoing Resistance and ongoing Massacres

By and large the resistance and armed struggle began as campaigns by tribal warriors, who just wanted to get rid of the strange occupants pushing them around. By the time it got more organized, gained more support from exile Papua and sympathizers in Papua New Guinea (the eastern half of the island) and other Melanesians. Important in this process is the plunder of the resources by international companies, by which Indonesia tries to pay their own debts to world finance (a general problem of “Third World countries). The destruction and pollution of the natural surrounding and the expelling of people, so that Westerners can get “their” oil, gold and other precious resources “which by incident got under the rain wood of those savages”, fuels the resistance of the people. The brutality of the Indonesian army accordingly to moderate assumptions has cost the lives of more than 100,000 Papua. More on the struggle is to be found down this article in links.

Brothers in suffering

How little the Indonesian policy had to do with the fact that West Papua was once “united” with Indonesia in “Dutch East India” showed the treatment of the Portuguese colony East Timor which got near independence in the downfall of Portugal´s Salazar regime (to which the struggle of the people in its African colonies contributed enormously). With the support of the US Indonesia annexed East Timor and massacred many thousands of the inhabitants. In all this resulted in more than 100,000 deaths as the consequence also of hunger and illness. In the end the enormous brutality raised international protest which contributed together with the fierce resistance (by Falintil, the armed force of the Fretelin) to East Timor´s independence in September 2002. This development is in a way a torch and hope for the suffering Papua.

Hopes, Dangers and perspectives

As said before the example of East Timor might be encouraging, but notwithstanding the fact that East Timor has besides its Sandal wood off shore oil resources about which a partial sea boundary solution with Australia is reached, West Papua is a much more tempting prey for imperialism. If West Papua would hopefully gain independence international corporations are more on the uncertain side because the resistance as such is a lot motivated by the extraction of the resources. In such a case the empire (US) might even prefer unification with Papua New Guinea since neocolonial ties there are already established. The present turmoil in the eastern half of the island is largely the result of that. As long as the US capitalists are relatively sure of Indonesia they´ll do a lot to enable Indonesia to uphold its grip. A changing geostrategic situation in East and South East Asia could change things, especially if the upcoming currency treaty between China and Japan might do its part, since Japan is joining in the exploitation of Indonesia at the US´s will. On the other side do the covered plans to expand NATO to Australia and New Zealand not provide much good for the region since it´s the clear symbol for the will to perpetuate “white man´s world rule”.

The people of Papua must know that even Europe being still in the status of a vassal to the US Empire would be a very shaky ally in their aspirations. Public pressure and a strong support by leftist parties as well as solidarity from “Third World Countries”, especially from African countries, would be a desired help, but are still lacking. Understanding in Melanesia is growing, Vanuatu gave a good signal. To be “freed” by the West à la Libya is surely not an option, the country doesn´t need more bombs to be dropped. It will be a hard and protracted long struggle only to be won with the patience the freedom hero Filep Karma shows, who was thrown into prison by Indonesians after having raised West Papua´s flag in 2004 (

Andreas Schlüter

Information about West Papua´s independence struggle organized by Papua:

Support from Vanuatu:

Other reports:,%20Stand%20Up%20printed.pdf

East Timor:

On the anthropological aspect touched in the preface:

Mainland India, where black presence by own migration and by Arab deportation from Africa might be difficult always to make a difference:,_at_Devaliya_Naka,_Sasan_Gir,_Gujarat.jpg


Andaman Islands (politically belonging to India):

Malaysia, Semang:

Aetas of the Philippines:


Melanesians from Fiji:

See also:

African Struggles in Perspective“: