Mit ‘Bush Clan’ getaggte Beiträge

If you want to see, how in the US „the deep state“ is at work, how the US Power Elite is working via their „Intelligence“ structures with impunity against all constitutional and legal frames, you´ve got to read „Family of Secrets“ by Russ Baker ( on the assassination of Kennedy and on the Bush Clan. I´ve mentioned that book in some articles ( & on this internet blog. The well researched book is a „must read“ if you want to look into the „power machine“ of the US. One might say, Kennedy´s assassination was half a century ago, so what? But believe it, the degeneration of morals in the really powerful inside the US has rather speeded up.

The Tragedy´s Second Part

In context with Kennedy´s assassination more murders took place, as for example the „patsy“ Oswald, but another one is also outstanding. Mary Pinchot Meyer, Kennedy´s most important extramarital „affair“, was murdered less than a year after her lover. Not only that she obviously had have a great influence on the President in turning him away from Cold War and its risks (which infuriated an important section of the US Power Elite), but she knew a lot about his adversaries and was infuriated about the gigantic „cover up“ represented by the „Warren Commission” and threatened to speak out in public. This was not to be! She was murdered on a walk, the deed was to be presented as a “deadly sexual assault” fixed to a helpless black “patsy”. By a brilliant African American lawyer, Dovey Johnson Roundtree, this attempt was smashed, the patsy acquitted without finding the true killer. But the case got also more delayed attention (beyond the fact that her affair had been written about a couple of years later).

Mary´s Mosaic” by Peter Janney


Someone also going deep into the case was Peter Janney. The best friend of one of her sons, who died age nine, and deeply impressed by his friend´s mother and her personality could not forget the case happening when he was a teenager. The later on clinical psychologist was indeed almost haunted by the terrible crime on his idol. With criminal cases and teams working on them usually people being involved with the victim or the evil doer are with good reasons excluded from the case. But (being dramaturgically at times exploited in criminal thrillers) a personal involvement can also deliver the obsession which is sometimes needed to take the pain and hardship to get on the bottom of overall complicated cases. Now he was not only a boyish admirer of his dead friend´s mother but also found out that his father – a high ranking CIA man as well as Mary´s ex husband likewise – were also strangely involved into the case. Mary Pinchot Meyer was a “society Lady”, being “one of them”, but “there are limits”. So obviously also to her former class mate James Angleton, high, high up in the CIA hierarchy thought. Janney invested an enormous energy and was surely also at risk with his researches to find most of the clues of the case.

No doubt, the personal affection with Janney has affected his style of writing at times in a way which could be seen as negative in as far as he tends to idealize Mary Pinchot Meyer and her lover as well. Also some details coming from his affection lengthen the book making it more difficult for the reader (with time shortage) to follow, but it must be admitted, unlike in Kennedy´s case, who fascinated so many people, perhaps it needed exactly Janney´s personal involvement to put that much energy into the case of the far less prominent Mary Pinchot Meyer!

Hear the man himself:’s_mosaic_-_interview

Anyway, Christmas ahead, buy the book ( for yourself and/or for politically interested relatives and friends! Read it, I guess you won´t regret!

Andreas Schlüter


The end of the Cold War has lead people to expect “peace dividend”, especially for the Southern Hemisphere. Whoever believed in that should be thoroughly cured from the illusion by now. Anyway, this cure could only be possible if looking at the world as a whole. Those people in the Western world who are not at the lower part of the social strata in large numbers are enjoying their mind killing pampering by “Entertainment” and “Infotainment”. And many times they join in to cheer a war waged for the “safety” of the West (their “world”) and for “Human Rights” and “Democracy”, the later many times bombed into (Non)-existence by depleted uranium covered ammunition. But the media pampered public is many times not aware that their rulers are waging war (in their name) against the world. The public by and large is having the feeling that it´s a “police action” for a “better world” to come. Only when driven too far into the absurd like now in the case of “punishing Syria” in the US a considerable part of the people regains a “Vietnam feeling”. This general situation in deed started to manifest after Nine Eleven.

The core of Western or better US Politics – Official and Unofficial

After all the situation after Nine Eleven was intellectually “well prepared” by Samuel P. Huntington´s “Clash of Civilizations”, predicting a fierce fight between Western “Democracies” and the Islamic world. And the aim was described by Francis Fukuyama´s “The End of History and the Last Man”. Thus the world was prepared for hustling Toward a New World Order. But a fitting atmosphere could also be helpful:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor„.[15]

From Section V of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, entitled „Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force“

The US Neocons didn´t have “to wait” too long for that. On the 11th September 2001 they had their “catalyzing” event, their “Pearl Harbor”, costing  2996 lives . The terrible  day was the prelude for the “War on Terror”, better to be called the War of Terror, taking hundreds thousands of lives. The justifications went from saving “the Nations security” to “fighting for human rights and democracy”, at times as the pretended  measure to reach the first goal. The real aim is – according to the above named paper the full geo-strategic  dominance over the world by controlling world´s resources as well as well as the political actions of other countries.

The US have expanded their worldwide net of military bases in a real warlike manner, just following the concept. Nine Eleven is the justification to US´s world wide spying activities  and countries rejecting the protection by “Big Brother” must be prepared to soon be “visited” by Terrorism, reminding one of the way sinister events turn up if the owner of a Pizzeria rejects the “protection” of the Mafia! US Drones operate almost worldwide and kill people – declared “Terrorists” as well as people not even accused of anything – in thousands.

The US and their Western vassals claim the “right” to “take down governments” wherever they want, irrespective of the chaos and heaps of dead bodies they leave behind.  It appears justified to say their  “War of Terror” is a “Third World War”, especially waged against the Southern Hemisphere, as we see on the example of Syria even knocking at the gate to an involvement of Russia and China.

Should we Believe their Story or was it an Inside Job?

As long as one doesn´t believe that a coincident led four planes the same day out of the way Nine Eleven has to be classed a conspiracy. The only question highly controversial is the question which of the respective theories concerning the conspirators is most fitting. The official theory proposed by the US Authorities (the basis of this Wikipedia article: appears as lousy as the “Oswald Single Shooter Theory” in connection with Kennedy´s assassination in 1963 ( In the US a high percentage of people doesn´t believe its own governments as well as the mainstream media, so do many people in many parts of the world. Nevertheless those Main Stream Media dub the doubters “Conspiracy Theorists” in a very negative way. Without doubt the bundle of explanations among those people rejecting the official version is very diverse and some theories display absurd patterns – most loved by the believers in the official one in order to discredit the doubters in general. In the US the Truth Org ( is most prominent among the skeptics. Architects and Engineers (, Scholars (, Pilots ( and Fireman, of whom 343 lost their lives ( have formed their respective sub organizations to find the truth behind the incidents.

Miracles and Mysteries

Either certain people active at the stock exchange must have had highly qualified truth tellers on their payroll or must have had foreknowledge of the attacks: The first case would be rather astonishing, the second one extraordinarily frightening!

It sounds really fantastic that the most powerful state in this world with detailed regulations for the so called Air Policing – which means the tight control of the air and all planes – would not be able to detect those four planes ( More fantastic is the fact that that very morning an exercise “confused” the control of the air having exactly the very same situation of hijacked airplanes as their topic (,_2001) – wonderful! But, didn´t Condoleezza Rice say never ever would anybody have expected airplanes to be used as a weapon?

There was hardly ever a collapse of steel constructions ( because of a long lasting fire except the World Trade Center complex. If one accepts that because of very odd circumstances the Twin Towers collapsed (neglecting the signs of blasts as seen on the films: and is willing to totally ignore the more than strange phenomenon of molten metal and ongoing fire after the collapse ( nevertheless the falling of the famous Building No 7 is almost more difficult to explain within the frame of the official conspiracy theory. The building was not hit by a plane but by parts of one of the Twin Towers. There was a fire not coming from aviation fuel only affecting two or three stores but it collapsed! And it collapsed in a way that any demolition engineer would be proud of for his lifetime. No one having his senses intact can believe that collapse looks so controlled by incident provided he´s not entitled to supply disinformation:

It appears mysterious how it was possible to plant highly effective means of demolition into that building housing a number of important administrative institutions. But there should be facts to explain this “collapse from the book”. Mysterious or better miraculous appears also the fact that the plane hitting the Pentagon hit that part which was recently structurally strengthened and not yet having its full function back. There are many more miracles like unburned passports ( of alleged terrorists coming from the crashed airplanes and so on.


Could they do it?

Is it possible that parts of the US administration would do such a thing to their own people? Could they be unscrupulous enough? Well, don´t forget the Operation Northwoods planed as a false flag operation to be blamed on Cuba. In fact the case is so hot that the very serious and cautious Swiss historian Daniele Ganser ( has taken it up and delivered a highly interesting lecture on it:

Sharpening an Old Division

As small as the number of People is to be counted to the US Power Elite, this inside Job wasn´t the Job of all of them, as united they are in their desire to control the whole world. The split between those Neocons being represented by the Bush clan and those who like to work more indirect and less spectacular, being represented by the Orwellian Name „Soft Power“ (Orwellian in as far as those are also not shy to strangulate whole national economies) has been sharpened again ( As much as the Soft Power fraction is afraid of revealing the deeds of their Neocon Counter parts because of fear for final loss of all US reputaion they fear the Neocons´ hazardious actions. This surfaces also in the recent struggle over the US policy in the Eastern Mediterranian ( 

Andreas Schlüter

More Links:

See also: „USA and Israel, the Helpless Giant and his Mad Dog: are there more dirty secrets?“

USA and Israel, the Helpless Giant and his Mad Dog: are there more dirty secrets?“

Some facts about Nine Eleven:


on the US Power Elite:


All what is seen now in Egypt pretty much looks like another proof of the fierce struggle between the two fractions of the US Power Elite ( The real US Power Elite can be estimated to include hardly more than 100 people, maybe 150. Behind the common aim of keeping or gaining total control over this world there´s a fierce struggle going on over the strategy. The fractions differing strategies are manifested in their two political “schools”, so called “Soft Power” (which is an Orwellian name, since they´re not shy to let their “Economic Hitmen” ( destroy whole national economies) and the notorious Neocons.

Neocons versus “Soft Power”

The big difference lies in the role the two “schools” have for the Islamic world in their struggle against their “long term targets”: Russia, India and China. The Soft Power fraction´s theoretical exponent is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski stands for integrating part of the Islamic World into the US´s struggle against their main “enemies” which doesn´t go together with a too one sided approach to the Near East conflict. They also fear military “overstretching” and were formerly dubbed the “Traders”. They like to do things indirectly and have strong ties into Finance Capitalism. The fraction of the Neocons is more for direct action done by the US military, thus formerly dubbed the “Warriors”. They want “the boot on the ground” and tend to crush the Islamic World totally before finally turning to the “main enemy”. They are closest to Israel´s Power Elite and their dream of “having the whole cake” which means the perspective of the Palestinians “Transfer” over the Jordan. They made American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) their political watch dog. Those super rich WASPs didn´t originally do so out of Philo-Semitism but counting on the “unsinkable aircraft carrier” Israel. Possibly this fraction steered itself into a total dependency on Israel´s Power Elite by the insight of Israel´s intelligence services into Nine Eleven (see also

There can only be one “Best Friend” of the US in Near East (except Saudi Arabia): Israel!

The “Soft Power fraction” whose man in office is Obama was counting on Erdogan in Turkey and Mursi in Egypt. Mursi on his side was also engaged in the destabilization of Syria ( The Muslim Brothers not only in Egypt but also in Syria have long lasting ties to the West ( They fit very well into the concept of the “Soft Power” fraction. But after all the Neocon fraction and their Zionist allies can´t live with an “Islamic” solution including Islamist tendencies because that would necessarily mean concessions to the Palestinians. For the “Soft Power” fraction the Muslim Brothers were a good means against a secular civil but also nationalist development in Egypt (for which the Muslim Brothers were initiated decades ago). They are the “ideal” candidates for Brzezinski´s concept. For Israel´s policy in Near East it looks different: only Arab militaries hanging at US strings are acceptable with the exception of the Saudi monarchy (being far enough away and of no to little attraction to the common people in the Arab world). And Israel´s hard core Zionists are sitting on the neck of the Neocons.

The Neocon-Saudi Connection

The victory of the “Soft Power” over the Neocons manifested in the kicking of Petraeus and other high ranking US militaries (see was obviously a short term affair. The neocon ties into the US military and the ties of those to the Egyptian military gave the clue. The democratically elected Mursi government was ousted by the Egyptian generals. But that military coup could have been countered by the Obama administration if not the Saudis would also support the Egyptian Junta. And they do so! The Saudi regime is good friend of the Bush Clan (, they consequently step in and compensate Western financial aid ( In deed that might not really pacify the situation, the danger is high, that Egypt might face a long ongoing civil war like Algeria passed through after a military coup preventing the Islamic party from taking office after elections won. After all the Neocons surely won´t care, one might think of “Seven Countries in Fife Years” (, the famous interview with ret. US General Wesley Clarke. After all the enormous recourses of gas and oil in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea are the general reason for fierce US influence in the region as well as Geo-Strategy, but also Israel´s desire to trigger an “all out war” in the region for the desired “Transfer”.

The Egyptians as well as the Syrians and others are the ones paying the price for that strategy and the conflict over particular strategies, but Egyptians are especially the victims of a Proxy war between the two important fractions of the US Power Elite, more will follow!

Andreas Schlüter

Further link:

No doubt, having read Marx´s “Capital” is a great help to understand Capitalism and its modern neoliberal variant (which is much of early untamed Capitalism). But as someone who wants to understand present day world politics a number of books is indispensable reading stuff. Some of them I would like to recommend here:

I) William Blum, “Killing Hope, US military and CIA Interventions since World War II”

The most powerful actor in World Politics is the United States of America. Not only during the Cold War they were and are practically in most parts of the World intervening. Not to “make the World a better place” for the majority of the people, but literally to kill the hopes of the masses. Even moderate efforts by politicians in office to let the “common man” or woman get a little bit more justice and a fairer part of what they work for are reason enough for the Empire (US) to remove them by media manipulation, bribery, instigating treason or civil war or simple murder. This book gives a voluminous account of most of the deeds coming from the land that calls itself “the Land of the Free”. 

II) Naomi Klein, “The Shock Doctrine”

What the US Empire is really after, is well explained by Naomi Klein: they want to push the common people into a state of shock, being unable to realize what is done to them, dictate to their representatives the conditions and let them pay for their own suppression. The blueprint to this is coming from US techniques of individual manipulation of people by “stone age” psychiatric methods like electro shocks. The economic aims were formulated by Milton Friedman and his “Chicago Boys”. 

III) C. Wright Mills, “The Power Elite”

Behind the pseudo democratic curtain there are the real decision makers, the Power Elite. Together with the economic power, now coming from a highly concentrated industry, the heads of the political and military sphere make up the Power Elite, in which the economic power has the greatest saying.

 IV) Russ Baker, “Family of Secrets”

An insight into one of the “ruling” families and their activities allows this voluminous book, thoroughly researched. You might possibly be astonished to read that grandfather Bush (Prescott) was involved in getting the Nazis into power and to learn how “close” father Bush (“Poppy”) was to Kennedy´s assassination. Not only that he was around during the time of the Dallas shooting but his close friend de Mohrenschild had taken care of Lee Harvey Oswald (the “Patsy”) as a fatherly friend. The involvement of Poppy Bush into the events around Kennedy´s assassination is so scandalous that it´s hard to believe. You´ll also read how that son George W. who doesn´t hesitate to send his country´s sons and daughters into battle in order to kill thousands of other people and possibly die themselves was sneaking away when it came to his own military service!

 V) Noam Chomsky, “Media Control”

If you want to know how all such frightening things could be hidden to the public, how crimes against Humanity, against human right and international law could be turned into the opposite in public eyes, then this book of the “Grand Seigneur” of political Analysis is very helpful.

It appears almost impossible to leave these books aside when trying to understand present day politics.

Andreas Schlüter

Fraglos gibt es Menschen mit einer Sucht nach Spekulationen den Tod von Menschen betreffend, die medial zu Mythen verklärt worden sind („Elvis lebt“). Die Gründe des Todes von Tutanchamun oder „Lady Di“ sind aber ohne bis von wenig Bedeutung für die heutige Welt. Ganz anders steht mit den Ursachen für Kennedys Tod. Warum?

Das einzig verbliebene wahre Imperium

Nach dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs waren die USA das einzig verbliebene kapitalistische – selbst, wenn man die Sowjetunion als (nicht-kapitalistisches) Imperium bezeichnen würde – Imperium, ungeachtet der Tatsache, dass es andere entstehende Mächte gibt. Wenn die USA etwas anderes wären als was sie vorgeben zu sein, nämlich eine wirkliche Demokratie, dann wäre das eine alarmierende Situation; und, man sollte sich wirklich sorgen, sie sind schon lange keine Demokratie mehr! Und die wirklichen Mächte im Staat sind nicht die bekannten Kräfte, die normalerweise schlichter Reichtum und Wissensvorsprung mit sich bringen, auch nicht schlichte und offene Gewalt, wie das üblicherweise in der Geschichte gewesen ist. Die Kräfte, die die Demokratie zersetzten und die Macht übernommen haben, sind schon von Kennedy und seinem Vorgänger Dwight D. Eisenhower beschrieben worden. Man höre (bzw. lese in den Untertiteln) ihre Worte:

Blau wird zu Orange gemacht

Wieder und wieder werden wir mit den offiziellen Theorien zur Ermordung Kennedys zugeschüttet, dem einzelnen Schützen, offiziell als Lee Harvey Oswald identifiziert, der vom Schulbuchlager aus von hinten auf Kennedy schoss und offensichtlich Kennedy von vorne traf! Sogar diese schlichte Tatsache kann auf dem legendären „Zapruder-Film“ erkannt werden, der eindeutig zeigt, wie der von vorn kommende Schuss den Kopf des Präsidenten nach hinten wirft:

Und sogar viele Berichte, die die offizielle Theorie in Frage stellen, ignorieren die Lösung, von wo der Schuss wirklich kam und flüchten sich statt dessen zu obskuren dunklen Flecken auf Fotos vom Grashügel, zu dem sich sogar Menschen nach den Schüssen flüchteten. Tatsächlich kam der Schuss von unten aus der Kanalisation, wie hervorragend nachgewiesen wurde:

Wenn also offensichtliche Tatsachen verdreht werden und blau zu orange gemacht wird, zu welchem Zweck geschieht dies? Und warum werden Leute, die klare Erkenntnisse über den Schuss von vorn herausarbeiten, systematisch ignoriert? Gab oder gibt es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA, um die Wahrheit zu verschleiern, oder gab es auch eine Verschwörung innerhalb der USA, um den Präsidenten zu töten? Hätte es nur eine Verschwörung in den USA gegeben, um eine ausländische Verschwörung zu verschleiern, vielleicht, um zu verhindern, dass dieser Vorfall zu einem Krieg führen könnte, wären alle Gründe zur Aufrechterhaltung der Vertuschung hinfällig. Der einzige Grund der Aufrechterhaltung dieser Vertuschung kann nur darin bestehen, dass das Attentat ein „Inside Job“ war, also eine Verschwörung von Kräften innerhalb der USA. Die Kreise, die diese Verschwörung zu verantworten haben, müssen genau die Mächte sein, die sowohl Eisenhower als auch Kennedy so bildhaft beschrieben haben! Und zu denen wurden auch bereist hervorragende Recherchen von Russ Baker angestellt (wie auf diesem Blog schon dargestellt: & Verwickelt ist offensichtlich auch der Bush-Clan, speziell „Poppy“ Bush, George H. Bush, früherer CIA-Direktor und späterer Präsident ( Sein Sohn, George W. Bush, fuhr mit Verschwörungen fort, manipulierend und lügend. Diese zwei Präsidentschaften waren die beiden Fälle, wo die verborgenen „Kräfte der Finsternis“ direkt „ihren Mann“ im Amt hatten, die Fälle, wo auch keine verborgenen Zügel nötig waren, an denen sie geführt wurden. Aber schließlich sahen zu viele Menschen allzu deutlich die Brutalität und imperiale Gier im Sohn, George W. Bush, personifiziert. Ein anderes Gesicht, eine andere Art von Persönlichkeit war als Repräsentanz des Imperiums und seiner Pseudodemokratie nötig.

Was also ist mit „Change“?

Seit der Ermordung Kennedys ist die wahre Macht in den USA für die offenkundig, die sehen wollen. Und seither wissen das die US Präsidenten auch. Die Tatsache, dass da verborgene Kräfte sind, die über das Schicksal des US-Präsidenten entscheiden alarmierte sogar „Tricky Dick“, Richard Nixon. Seine Forderungen, die geheimen Akten zu Kennedys Ermordung zur Einsicht zu erhalten, wurden schlicht ignoriert (siehe „Family of Secrets“, S. 244 ff). Spätestens nach der Amtseinführung werden sich US Präsidenten dieser bedrohlichen Tatsache bewusst. Aber insgesamt sind beide etablierten US Parteien tief in das Netz der Superreichen und ihres militärisch-industriell-geheimdienstlichen Komplexes verwoben. Obama mag wirklich einen Wandel im Sinn gehabt haben, während er dafür kämpfte, der „erste schwarze Präsident“ der USA zu werden. Aber sogar, als er noch eine klare mehrheit hatte, versäumte er es, seine Versprechen umzusetzen. Es ist deutlich, dass ein wirklicher Wandel zum Besseren nur in einer breiten linken, also sozialen Bewegung, die sich zu kraftvollen politischen Partei entwickelt, liegen kann, so, wie es damals, leider vergeblich, Jesse Jackson ( mit seiner „Regenbogen-Koalition“ versuchte.

Kein Wandel ohne umfangreichen Kampf – und die Souveränitätsfrage

Vor dem Hintergrund dieser Ausführungen ist klar, dass das ominöse Netzwerk hinter den vorhängen nicht aufgeben wird, und schon die Behandlung der „Occupy“-Bewegung mit umfangreicher Polizei-Brutalität, die Manipulationen des Wahlrechts sowie die neuen Überwachungs- und Internierungsgesetze ( zeigen die wütende Entschlossenheit dieser Kreise. Das bedeutet nicht, dass es dort nicht unterschiedliche Sichtweisen und Konzepte geben könne, es ist kein wirklich monolithischer Block, aber es gibt von diesem Komplex aus gesehen rote Linien, für deren Überschreitung ein US Präsident einen hohen Preis zu zahlen hätte.

Die Nazis hatten eine zynische Sicht auf die Souveränität, feststellend: „Souverän ist, wer den Ausnahmezustand erklären kann“. Die der US-Realität angemessene Deutung wäre: „Souverän ist, wer über den Tod des US Präsidenten (und anderer Präsidenten) entscheidet“. Und: Souverän ist, der entscheidet, wer aus dem amerikanischen Volk im schlimmsten Falle überlebt; aber das ist eine weitere Geschichte.

Andreas Schlüter

Without doubt there are people with obsessions concerning the death or otherwise fate of people converted into a hero media wise. The reasons for Tutankhamun or even of “Lady Di” deaths are of no up to little relevance for present day´s world. Very different is the case of Kennedy´s assassination. Why?

The sole Empire in the true sense left

After the end of WW II the USA was the only capitalist Empire left and – even if one would class the Soviet Union an (non capitalist) Empire – after the end of the Cold War it was and is definitely the only left Empire, irrespective of the fact that there are other powers emerging. If the US are not what it pretends to be, a true democracy, then that would be an alarming situation; and really worry, it is not or no more since long! And those forces which rule are not just the well known forces of simple wealth and more extended knowledge or even of simple and open brutality as common in history. The forces which have eroded the democracy and taken over power were already named by Kennedy and the president preceding him, Eisenhower. But listen to their words:

Blue into orange!

Again and again we were dumped with the official theories on JFK´s assassination, the single shooter, officially being identified as Lee Harvey Oswald, shooting from the school book depository behind and obviously hitting JFK from the front! Even this simple fact of the shot coming from the front can be seen on the “Zapruder film” showing clearly the force coming from the front and pushing the president´s head back:

And even many reports questioning the official theory are ignoring the clear evidence where from the shot really has come in favor of obscure dark spots on photos on the grassy hill where to even people tried to escape after the shooting. The shot came from the sewage system as it is excellently proven:

So, if obvious facts are distorted and blue turned into orange, for what purpose? And why are people working out the evidence of the shot from the front being ignored? Was or is there only a conspiracy to cover up the truth inside the US or was there a conspiracy to kill the president on the side of forces inside the US? If there was a conspiracy to cover the fact that a foreign conspiracy has led to the murder of the president, a conspiracy to prevent the incident to turn into a war, all reasons to keep it up are gone. The only reason to carry on with this masquerade can lie in the fact that the assassination was an “inside job”! The distortion of facts is the result of a conspiracy in order to cover up a US based conspiracy against the president. The people conspiring must necessary be located in high ranking levels, exactly in that strata warned of by JFK as well as Eisenhower. Also about those dark circles excellent research work has been done by Russ Baker (also reported here previously: Involved is obviously the Bush clan, precisely “Poppy” Bush, George H. Bush, former CIA director and later President ( His son, George W. Bush, carried on with conspiracies, manipulating and lying. Those two presidencies were the two cases where the hidden forces had “their men” directly in office, with no hidden indirect strings necessary! But at last too many people saw the brutality of imperial greed openly personified in the son, George W. Bush. Another face, another type of personality was needed as the “face to represent” the pseudo democratic US Empire.

So which “Change”?

Since the murder of Kennedy the true power in the US is obvious to those who want to see. And since that US presidents know. It alarmed even “tricky Dick”, Richard Nixon, that there was a force deciding over the fate of a US President. His demands to get insight into the secret files on JFK´s assassination were simply ignored (see “Family of Secrets”, page 244 following). At least when got into office US presidents get aware of that sad truth pretty soon. But generally spoken the two established parties are deeply woven into the spider net of the true power of the super rich and their military industrial secret service complex. Obama might really have had some changes in mind when he struggled to become the “first black President” of the US. But even when he still had a clear majority he was hesitating to bring proclamations into existence. It is pretty clear that a real change could only be based on an alternative leftist movement forming into a political party potent enough, as those days Jesse Jackson ( tried with his “rainbow coalition” unfortunately in vain.

No change without extended struggle and “sovereignty”

Before the background of the said it is clear that the ominous network behind the scene will not give up and already the treatment of the “occupy movement” with extended police brutality, the manipulations of the right to vote and the new legislation ( show the fierce determination of the named forces. That does not mean that there couldn´t be different views and concept inside that network, it is surely not totally monolithic, but there are “red lines” concerning its power for which transgressions a US President will have to pay a high price. And there is reasonable fear that they might even unlash some sort of US fascism to defend their rule. The Nazis had a cynic view on “sovereignty”, stating “sovereign is who declares the state of emergency”, the new formulation would be “sovereign is who decides over the US President´s (and other President´s) death”! And sovereign is who decides who´s going to survive of the nation in “case of the worst”, but that´s another story.

Andreas Schlüter