For someone dealing with political analysis for decades it is no secret: this world is full of conspiracies! If you´re familiar with researches on Primates you know, it´s our evolutionary heritage at least since the common ancestor of us and the Chimpanzees! Furthermore the power over what is “true” and what not is an important element of power as such: “the Sun is circulating around the Earth, Galileo, mind this”! So the struggle for truth is a constitutional element of the struggle for Democracy, Social Justice and Liberty as such.
This struggle has developed, but those people in power have also developped many manipulative techniques. They have been able to distort the perception of Democracy, of women´s Liberation, of Human Rights as such in a way, that they´ve been able to make good people applaud when whole nations are bombed to ashes in the name of Democracy and Human Rights as show the examples of Libya and Syria. And they have developed the techniques to let an aggression appear as a defense.
“Too many” people still skeptic
The commercial media in the Western countries are almost entirely woven into the capitalist web and doing anything else but revealing the truth and help the people to understand this world. They are rather propaganda agencies of the powerful. Nevertheless there are “too many people” not ready to be blindfolded and ready to let their logics work. Those ones getting deeper into the analysis are a “big danger”, when they tend to infect other people with justified skepticism. “What to do?”, said the powerful ones and found another “brilliant” trick, founded on Psychology, a science truly designed to help power keep itself up, well, or to sell, which gets to the same end!
How do you condition dogs? You get them feel uncomfortable when they getting near something which you don´t want them to get near or to eat. If you can throw publications into the game, which contain the truth on one side and make people feel so uncomfortable (more than at times the truth does make them feel anyway) that they´ll avoid the truth in the future and dismiss it. If you choose the “right” method you can even make those ones “impossible” who seriously try to spread insight. Dump productions with truth contained with uncomfortable effects into the net. The targets are not those ones knowing or “smelling” it already, but those ones who need to be made to understand. Those people having come already to see the “real thing” will be so glad that they find their conclusions inside, that they don´t realize the poison. That will hit those ones to be convinced. They need to get a “vaccination” against the truth.
You have a former Secret Service member being maltreated and driven into a problematic situation of her psychic condition. Give her a “frame” to tell the truth that makes her appear totally weird and being a psychiatric case. Arrange her with an absurd background and let her be introduced by someone being perceived like a clown. Independent analysts will see: yes, she speaks the truth! Then they´ll pass that to people who should understand. By then the effect will turn out. What are you presenting to me? Such a clownish performance! I should take that serious? All these “Conspiracy Theorists” are crazy!
Susan Lindauer will probably not know what the effects are (hopefully), but those ones arranging for her know! Look at but don´t spread it willing to convince people, since you´d reach the opposite (without respective warnings):
Maybe a stronger dope is necessary. There´s a guy many times revealing very true facts or very plausible analysis, but the guy is producing a “horrible” vibration, aggressive and with a voice that could be used in Guantanamo for torture! He should know how to appear convincing, but his communication is driving at the opposite. The guy is Alex Jones of whom I don´t believe he would not to be conscious of his performance´s effect:
Another strange case is that of Paul Hellyer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Hellyer), former Canadian Minister of Defence, who delivers a very correct analysis of US politics framed by an UFO Story which can at least be named „highly controversial“. No matter how one judges the question of UFO sights, this appears as an attempt (possibly unwillingly) to smear the very necessary disclosure of US conspiracies against mankind with „fantastic SF stories“ and thus „contaminating“ them and rendering them „absurd“, giving the chance to manipulators when confronted with that truth to yell: „ah, you say the same as that weird UFO apologist“!
The Serious Ones
We´re living in the times of “YouTube” but many times printed analyses are more serious. But nevertheless you have very serious presentations on YouTube as well by scientists, among them a whole number from the “Truther Movement”. But a really great example of a serious presentation is the Swiss Historian Dr. Daniele Ganser (http://www.danieleganser.ch/Home.html?lang=en). Watch his presentation on “Nine Eleven”: